[General] Electron Size in a Collision

[Vivian Robinson]

Chip, John M and all,

Sorry about that. It looked fine on my screen but didn't transmit well. 

Appended is the whole document in word form, with the equations in their right place. For completeness, my earlier attachment is also appended.

Cheers,

Vivian Robinson







On 12/04/2015, at 4:27 AM, Chip Akins <chipakins at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Vivian
>  
> I think I may have only received a portion of your last email.
>  
> You make good points and I don’t want to miss any of them.
>  
> If it is not too much trouble can you resend that info?
>  
> If others received the full email you could send it to chipakins at gmail.com.
>  
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>  
> Chip
>  
> From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Vivian Robinson
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 1:50 AM
> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion
> Subject: Re: [General] Electron Size in a Collision
>  
> Dear All, 
>  
> Regarding the size of an electron and its properties under my interpretation of the double looped rotating photon model, I submit the following summary of some of those properties:-
>  
> Under this model, an electron at rest has a radius 
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at viv at etpsemra.com.au
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40etpsemra.com.au?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

Vivian,
 
I am sending this only to you.  Your last post is very hard to understand with many attachments which are not obvious how they fit together.  I attempted to organize them into a single Word document, but the attached Word document is what I obtained.  I went vertically starting with the left hand column, but this does not make any sense.  I now see that perhaps they fit together better if I go horizontally, but even that is not correct. Also I suspect that most readers will not be able to open TIFF documents. 
 
I really do want to read your thoughts.  Therefore, please restate them in an easy to read format.  For example, you can rearrange the various parts of the attached Word document and add text as necessary.  It is possible to write equations in Word if you click the “insert” tab then click either “equations” or “symbols”. Once the Word document is complete, it can be pasted into an email or merely be an attachment.  
 
Sincerely,
 
John M.
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150412/3ccd73b4/attachment-0003.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: General Discussion.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 67072 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150412/3ccd73b4/attachment-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150412/3ccd73b4/attachment-0004.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: f_PPI-4-Robinson_7102_3567-14.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 153368 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150412/3ccd73b4/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150412/3ccd73b4/attachment-0005.htm>