[General] Vot is der matter?

[Andrew Meulenberg]

Dear Richard,

Without realizing it, I think that I did pick up what John W was saying.
TE-vot ^2 is total energy, the scalar. TE-vot is a vector, with properties
TBD.

Andrew

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Andrew,
>    It would seem that TE-vot = KE-vot + PE-vot.  Energy is a scalar not a
> vector with vector components.
>           Richard
>
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 4:59 AM, John Williamson <
> John.Williamson at glasgow.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Yes. Root-energy density is just square-root-energy density.  As in square
> it and integrate it over a volume density. No-one likes new stuff.  Ke-vot
> and PE-vot are then valid quantities. Have a go at the papers! If they are
> hard to understand I want to know about it!
>
> Regards, John.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* General [
> general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
> on behalf of Andrew Meulenberg [mules333 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 17, 2015 12:43 PM
> *To:* Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion; Andrew
> Meulenberg; Mary Fletcher; robert hudgins
> *Subject:* [General] Vot is der matter?
>
> Dear John W,
>
> Sometimes I think that I might actually understand what you are saying.
>
> I hated your introduction of the word 'vot'. I did not understand it or
> why you though it was needed or useful. It had 'nothing' to give it a frame
> of reference (such as abbreviations do).
>
> However, yesterday I found myself proposing to Bob that we might think of
> energy in a new manner. Just as intensities are scalars that come from
> amplitudes squared, can kinetic and potential energies (KE and PE) be
> squares of orthogonal components (aka KE-vot and PE-vot) of a total-energy
> vector TE-vot? Thus:
>
> TE-vot = sqrt[(KE-vot)^2 + PE-vot)^2 + ...].
>
> Is there something useful here? Can it determine what parts of a spinning
> gyroscope are KE and which are PE? Is matter PE or KE? Is there a mass-vot,
> etc. of a multi-dimensional vector? If so, what kind of algebra pertains?
>
> I still don't know what your concept is. (I hope to have time to finally
> read your papers.) Did your definition of "root energy density" finally hit
> me that you may be simply referring to *square* root, not just to a
> 'deeper' aspect of the word energy? Did I pick up something at a
> subconscious level or did a 'mystery' (to me) simply trigger a search
> response in a different direction?
>
> Then I see pi-vot and, connecting 'pi' with rotary motion and vortices, I
> connect it all with an internal wave motion. Then I remember that, while
> bullshit is good fertilizer, It is only useful if good seeds are planted.
> Is my mind being expanded - or simply 'bent'.
>
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
> <a href="
> http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150817/3344919b/attachment.htm>