[General] Weyl Fermions

[David Mathes]

John
I'm a bit tired...so bear with me. 

Thank you for reducing the "it" count to 9 per page, at least on the front page. I was not able to view the other pages if any. Send more.
Paragraph
P1.  Speculations are guesses. Theories are more in the hypothesis categories. One could argue educated guesses but they are really based on assumptions quite often whether the assumptions are known or not.
Mathematical physics is an invaluable tool. Yes, Nature has the ultimate vote on any theory and punishes the inadequate and incomplete with anecdotal exceptions that just do not fit. That is, a theory is not a law. The theory may work but not quite in all cases. Theories fall short. 
So do experiments. Experiments are contextually based often in a context of implicit assumptions. Explaining the assumptions would in many cases require another paper or book even.
P2. Vetting permits constraining as well as sorting. A vetting process must be careful to consider more than one theory. And the foundation is only as strong as one can explicitly explain assumptions. 
P3. Allowable narcissi as a precursor to P4
P4. Space, time and energy density leads one to use 5D theories. In particular, Kaluza-Klein, Wyel and Williams (phat photon)
Word order should be - Maxwell, Dirac, and Schrodinger 
You give three choices, so remove the word "either"
P5 An interesting exercise to challenge assumptions is a Monte Carlo (combinatorial) analysis of space, time and energy. Can one have space and energy without time? Can one have time and energy but no space? Can one explain CP and PT violations?
That's all I can read...send more.
Best
David
 
      From: John Williamson <John.Williamson at glasgow.ac.uk>
 To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; David Mathes <davidmathes8 at yahoo.com> 
Cc: Kyran Williamson <kyran_williamson at hotmail.com>; Janet Williamson <janetconstructions at bigpond.com>; Nick Bailey <nick at bailey-family.org.uk>; Anthony Booth <abooth at ieee.org>; Manohar . <manohar_berlin at hotmail.com>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray at wanadoo.fr> 
 Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:17 AM
 Subject: Re: [General] Weyl Fermions
   
 #yiv5223831914 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Dear all,

Please find attached the "position" document I sent to SPIE this morning.

Regards, John W.

_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at davidmathes8 at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150719/f230d933/attachment.htm>