[General] FW: Medieval weapon

[John Williamson]

Posting this to general .. and to others .. to widen the scope for comment
________________________________
From: John Williamson
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 6:16 AM
To: David Mathes
Subject: RE: Medieval weapon

Good points David (as usual),

Answers ...

Yes, less busy is probably better .. I think I will try using the "birds" and replace this in the quantisation of light  paper too.

Good point on momentum .. should explain in text that loops are initially created on top of one another, that their centres are (amost infinitely) slow-moving with respect to the incoming photons and that they separate on a time frame long compared to the phase coherence time of the incoming photons - as viewed from any frame.

Not using other peoples models - it is John D (amongst others) who has been showing old pictures of mine.

Povray can be animated but I could spend time on an infinite number of things and this is not a current priority for me (as I cannot animate the paper). If anyone wants the Povray code to have a go at it though I'm open to suggestions (with the condition that I retain copyright both of the initial code and share in this for subsequent developments) ...

The confinement is not due, in any way, in my theory to GRT but to the creation of the scalar Pivot field. Of course one needs to look beyond GRT. It is quite irrelevant in developing photon-electron models. Gravity is way way too weak (as I have been saying all along). It is Pivot (in the new theory), together with the electric field, that  provides a force strong enough to confine the photon. I probably need to emphasise this more as it is not getting across.

There is no net jerk or jolt at any point in the EM field or the created pivot. The condition, encapsulated in the force equations for field, is that the motion is everywhere force-free. What could any jerk or jolt be with respect to?  It turns out that the Maxwell equations are (and always were) a sufficient condition that the forces on the field elements are everywhere, locally zero. Likewise the new equations incorporate Newtons laws (in a severe limit, in each and every Lorentz frame- locally). At threshold, the electron and positron pools are created at rest. I realise now that I certainly need to say this (I thought it was just obvious and everyone knew it!). I am really a complete innocent idiot am I not?

Any jerk or jolt occurs may be ascribed to the initial photons considered as a whole (therefore not really existing as such he?) (stopped -dead -therefore function simply of energy momentum density - which could be any amount depending on photon wave train length) and then to the electron and positron pools which then separate at sub-lightspeed depending on the 4-momentum transfer in the photon collision. Not a problem for positronium annihilation as the two  particles are intially stationary. In order to calculate this stuff you would have to separate the photons from the electrons. The whole point of the theory, though, is precisely that they are one and the same thing.

Regards, John.
________________________________
From: David Mathes [davidmathes8 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 6:53 AM
To: John Williamson
Subject: Re: Medieval weapon

John

If you have to ask, yes. And the busyness does not provide clear information. You might as well use compass points (8 points per revolution). However, I'm not sure that there is a constant velocity. Nor is there any indication that foundational issues such as momentum and energy are conserved. Phase and polarization are also at issue.

You might consider building up over a period of 2, 3 or 4 slide views. Side by side comparisons might help. Identify key points on the slide. Use animation to show the slide, points and comparisons. Take a slide and split it.

Also, if you start using other people's models, clearly identify who the source was and when they made it.

In Richard's topological models, he places a graph below the model showing a full cycle with velocity and acceleration, and in the past, he graphed - at my request - jerk/jolt.

My opinion is that one has to look a little beyond relativity - GRT - and begin the process of incorporating higher levels.

When I pressed Woodward to do this, he found that while acceleration dominated in GRT, the expansion resulted in two terms: a^2 and the units equivalent, j*v. As it turns out, any first year robotics student understands jolt very clearly.

David


________________________________
From: John Williamson <John.Williamson at glasgow.ac.uk>
To: David Mathes <davidmathes8 at yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: Medieval weapon

Good for you. I appreciate the feedback. I can wind up the light levels or lighten the colours of course -- but are they also just too busy?

Regards, John.


________________________________
From: David Mathes [davidmathes8 at yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:40 AM
To: John Williamson
Subject: Re: Medieval weapon

The rest of the plots are very informative.

The ones on this email are simply too dark.

David

________________________________
From: John Williamson <John.Williamson at glasgow.ac.uk>
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; David Mathes <davidmathes8 at yahoo.com>
Cc: Nick Bailey <nick at bailey-family.org.uk>; Anthony Booth <abooth at ieee.org>; Manohar . <manohar_berlin at hotmail.com>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray at wanadoo.fr>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 9:35 PM
Subject: Medieval weapon

Here are some plots like that in POS.

One of these is the cover - as produced by Peter Steeneken, for the cover of a book for the Fanatenlustrum talks of 2010. Comments at the conference was that it looked like the business end of a medieval weapon. The others are just different views from different angles.

The idea with all of these is to say which ones you think work best.

All are copyright (of course) but you are all free to use them if you want.

All comments appreciated!

Regards, John W.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150625/22005fa3/attachment.htm>