[General] SU(2) equation set

[Stephen Leary]

Gentlemen,

Sorry for no response so far. I'm travelling at the moment. I should be back in Glasgow on Monday. 

Kind regards
Stephen 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Nov 2015, at 09:57, david williamson <david.williamson at ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 13 Nov 2015, at 14:40, af.kracklauer at web.de wrote:
>> 
>> Hi:
>>  
>> If I may, I'd like to stick a word here in.  For the record (as is said): I'm not up to speed, although I've given it a once-over.  
>>  
>> In the past, goofy, incomplete, mystical Physics theories have resulted from faulty or contradictory or inapproporate (and usually also covert-implicit) input.  Then the theory get developed, embelished, expanded, partially verified and what not until its "too big to fail”!  
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Well yes, that is evident. It is up to you lot, to make sure you do something about this establishment, and the luminaries therein wearing those “emperor's new clothes” or standing on those wobbly pedestals. It is equally and fundamentally important to expose this as it is to seek the nature of matter ...
> 
> 
> 
>> […] An antidote for this syndrom is FIRST to produce a proposal or schimatic "for dummies."  One that "your mother could understand.”
> 
> … but I happen to think that the former is one which one could easily be understood by one’s mother. Let’s see some proper effort (and why not some publications too) focussed there.   
> 
> DavidW.
> 
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
> Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20151113/98770f4c/attachment.htm>