[General] research papers

[Wolfgang Baer]

chandra

I read the URL 
http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=59224&utm_campaign=papersubmission&utm_source=e_cp&utm_medium=nl_physics_20150911_huangytb

I think he idea that gravity and inertial mass might be different and 
perhaps velocity, which effects kinetic energy  might be related to
inertial fields due to distant matter (Mach's Principle) has not been 
properly taken into account in Special Relativity

However the authors simple equations varying G rather than "m" seems a 
bit simplistic and certainly could not be called a derivation
A lot more development needs to be done to connect this to physics

Wolf


Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 9/25/2015 9:49 AM, af.kracklauer at web.de wrote:
> Gentlemen:  > > Regarding "time dilation," many consider the situation altogether 
 > unclear---not without reason. > > The argument about mesons seen at 
sea level seems not to take account > of the cosmic rays reaching the 
lower atomosphere before initiang the > chain pi->mu->e.  At CERN, the 
10 or so detectors had to be put > inside the ring (so I'm told) for 
lack of space and the results > recalibrated theoretically to 
compensate!  Thus, there was enough > wiggle room here to protect 
reputation and !! funding. > > Clocks-around-the-workd has been 
criticized for two reasons: 1) the > data was post-selected (i.e., some 
thrown out becasue it "obviously" > didn't fit) and 2) the stability of 
atomic clocks then (probably now > too) was at least two order of 
magnitude too low for the experiment. > Also note, this experiment was 
funded by the Navy resulting in the > fact that the raw data was 
classified!  This may still be the case > although I think I remember 
hearing that at least a portion was > sprung by the Irishman who was 
then first to discover and point out > the data manipulation. > > At the 
end of the day, perhaps the best account of the two SR effects > can be 
called: "Minkowski perspective."  Which means that no objects > are LF 
contracted, nor are clocks (time intervals) dilated; rather > just their 
reports to observers in different inertial frames get the > info so as 
to form an aborrated "virtual image,"  which is modified, > just like 
objects seen from a distance appear smaller in Newtonian > physics. > > 
Even Einstein always said:  "As SEEN from the observer's (stationary) > 
frame" regarding all supposed LFcontrated displacements and dilated > 
intervals. > > ciao,  Al > > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. September 2015 um 
11:07 Uhr *Von:* "Dr. > Albrecht Giese" <genmail at a-giese.de> *An:* 
"Roychoudhuri, Chandra" > <chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu>, "Nature of 
Light and Particles - > General Discussion" 
<general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>, > "phys at a-giese.de" 
<phys at a-giese.de> *Betreff:* Re: [General] research > papers > > 
Regarding Special Relativity: You mean that the time dilation is an > 
"at hoc" assumption? The dilation is -  easily visible; one can move > a 
clock forth and back and compare it later to another clock which > was 
at rest all the time. The clock in motion is then retarded. This > fact 
is used (and so also proven) at the operation of GPS > satellites. -  
there are a lot of indications that in elementary > particles there is a 
permanent motion at c (speed of light), > "zitterbewegung". This is a 
simple physical reason for dilation. It > does not even need a 
relativity principle. > > > > > 
_______________________________________________ If you no longer wish > 
to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles > 
General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com <a > 
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"> 
 > >
Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20150925/9db99f53/attachment.htm>