[General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission

Wolfgang Baer wolf at nascentinc.com
Sun Aug 21 13:27:38 PDT 2016


very interesting thank you

I'm not familiar enough with the QED explanations of the differences 
cited. But the masses used in calculating the angular momentum are 
typically inertial masses. If we drop the assumption that the mass and 
charge are co-located point particles there might be an additional 
factor explaining the differences?

Still not clear to me how this might lead to increased photon emission. 
Unless we consider a version of Sommerfelds loading theory. This in 
effect suggests that electrons are held in stable orbits which on the 
average have radii and energy values measured,There is an action 
threshold required to cause a jump between states but inside these 
orbits there is variation without an actual state transition. Then small 
external perturbation may cause some of the electrons that are still 
held in their orbits, but not quite over the threshold to make a jump 
and eject light energy. Perhaps this makes sense to someone?

best, wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 8/20/2016 10:20 PM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:
>
> Can such a /hyp. gravitationally coupled electroweak monopole/ be 
> responsible for the higher uncertainty of the /g-factor/ within nucleons ?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_(physics)#Measured_g-factor_values 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_%28physics%29#Measured_g-factor_values>
>
> Gesendet von Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> für 
> Windows 10
>
> *Von: *Defiant NCC001 <mailto:defiantncc001 at hotmail.com>
> *Gesendet: *Samstag, 20. August 2016 10:58
> *An: *general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org 
> <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> *Betreff: *AW: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission
>
> To whom it may concern,
>
> Yesterday I talked to a physicist about this topic and from his 
> perspective: It can be excluded that gravity directly causes 
> tidal-effects within UPE of wheat-seedlings.
>
> I am not an expert on QCD or QEDand therefore I want to ask a question.
>
> Its about /gravitationally/ /coupled/ /electroweak magnetic monopoles./
>
> See this document:
>
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.08129v1.pdf
>
> *page 1 after the first paragraph:* *_Citation:_*
>
> Indeed the /Dirac monopole/ in /electrodynamics/ should transform to 
> the /electroweak monopole/ after the unification of the 
> /electromagnetic/ and /weak interactions/, and /Wu-Yang monopole/ in 
> /QCD/ is supposed to make the /monopole/ condensation to *confine the 
> color*.
>
> *_I am thinking about the _**_following hyp. possibility:_*
>
> Depending on the /gravity-pull/ of the moon, the hyp. /monopole/ 
> changes its size a bit. And by doing this, certain /gluon-*colors* 
> /are also change. I hypothesize that the /gluon-process/ in the atom 
> are like a gyroskop and this /gravitational coupling/ creates a slight 
> */color-precession/* within the atom. I hypothesize that under normal 
> circumbstances this "/precession-effect/" doesn´t disturb the known 
> laws of /'QCD/ and /QED/. Which means that an isolated atom is 
> behaving like expected.
>
> But if I now put atoms into a compound of atoms (like within a 
> /crystal-lattice/), the /gravity-pull/ of the moon could syncronize 
> this hyp. "/precession//-effect/" of each atom within the 
> /crystall-lattice/.
>
> Resulting in the effect that, depeding on the /gravit//y-pull/ of the 
> moon, the electron shells of the crystals sometimes react more or less 
> sensitive to UPE.
>
> Could such an effect (at least) somehow exist ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hubert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Baer
> Sent: Aug 14, 2016 4:49 PM
> To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org, Beverly Rubik
> Subject: Re: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission
>
> Hubert
>
> I've come into contact with a number of claims that connect 
> gravitation with local Electromagnetic phenomena.
>
> Obviously is the detection of gravity waves recently announced.
>
> Regibald Cahill also claims random number generators based on the 
> Zener diode are actually not random but effected by gravity. I've not 
> been able to reproduce his experiment but am working on it.
>
> REcently an Italian group has connected proton emission from stressed 
> iron being linked to the Cosmic background radiation cold spot.
>
> I feel here is a connection but it is difficult to trust results, good 
> low level photon experiments are difficult to perform and can easily 
> be misread let alone interpreted. In this case could other rhythms 
> offer alternative explanations or correlations?
>
> I've cc this to Ms Rubik who is familiar with these emission effects. 
> It would be good to gather a shit load of empirical data on these 
> phenomena so if you know any other experiments along these lines 
> please let me know.
>
> Thanks
>
> wolf
>
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>
> On 8/13/2016 11:50 PM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:
>
>     To whom it may concern,
>
>     A couple of months ago, I found the following article:
>
>     Spontaneous ultra-weak light emissions from wheat seedlings are
>     rhythmic and synchronized with the time profile of the local
>     gravimetric tide
>
>     http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-012-0921-5
>
>     This article demonstrates an interaction between tides
>     (gravitational influence of the moon) and emission of /ultraweak
>     photons/
>
>     How can such a phenomenon be explained ?
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Hubert
>
>     Gesendet von Mail
>     <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>für Windows 10
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>     Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
>     <mailto:Wolf at nascentinc.com>
>
>     <a
>     href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
>     <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
>
>     Click here to unsubscribe
>
>     </a>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160821/a268bb55/attachment.htm>


More information about the General mailing list