[General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission

Wolfgang Baer wolf at nascentinc.com
Mon Aug 22 11:24:51 PDT 2016 

Hubert;

This is extremely interesting.

I do not know if I understand the monopole argument unless we also 
assume some kind of wormhole geometry that allows the flux lines to be 
captured in a gravity black hole to emerge as its opposite pole 
somewhere else. But this is a bit speculative?


At this point I am gathering reports of potential gravito-electric 
effects. I tend to think early speculation of theory is often misleading.

However I very much like your translation of eastern philosophy terms 
int western science. We need such a dictionary.


Do you have any more papers on the /wheat seedlings/ phenomena/.?/

What experimental design would test for /tidal cycles/ visible within 
UPE of minerals?

we may be able to organize experiments at Labs in the SF area.


*Your Question:*

Cynthia Whitney "Algebraic Chemistry" has an interesting theory that 
clusters of electrons shared by atomic configurations are actully 
responsible for absorption and emission rather than individual atoms. 
Her book is expensive


Keep up the good work


Wolf


Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 8/22/2016 3:01 AM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I have elaborated a second explanation. It still has to do with 
> /magnetic monopoles./
>
> But first I have to explain, why I came up to the idea to look 
> for/tidal-effects/ within UPE of minerals.
>
>
>     A couple of years ago, I observed that a person born /23th July 
> 1971 /had its relapses in exactl lunar-nodal cyclic patterns, namely:
>
> /    29th January 1994/, /04th //April 2003/ and /28th August 2012. 
> /(exact explanation, see attached document).
>
>
> //   I found out that /Lunar nodes/ are created by the /gravitational 
> influence/ of the moon on the earth axis. So they have to do with gravity.
>
>     Due to my ayurveda- training and QiGong-excercises, I knew a bit 
> of hindu and taoistic philosophy.
>     In hindu philosophy the nodes are known as /Asuras/ and /Devas 
> /which "/churn the ocean of milk" /in order to /"//create //the world" 
> /out of a world montain/(magn. Monpole) /and a tortoise/(dark matter).
> /    The toritoise (Kurma) has the /Lou //Shou square/ on its back, 
> which in my opinion shows the /"laws of matter creation" /(/Vastu /or 
> /Fengh Shui/).
>
>
> */_Regarding __"Creation of the world":_/*
>
>     So I started to compare hindu philosophy with the most popular 
> hypothesis of astrophysics and came to the conclusion that there should be
>
> /tidal cycles/ visible within UPE of minerals. So far it was not 
> possible for me to organize a measurment with perl-minerals but at 
> least I found
>
>     some hints that such a phenomenon were already observed within 
> /wheat seedlings/.
>
>
> /*_Regarding different explanation:_*/
>
> In my thoughts /magnetic monopoles/ represent *TaiJi *- "the great 
> pole". The /*Yang-side*/ creates *gravity*, whereas the /*Yin-side 
> */creates /*consciousness */(in astrophysics known as /*dark energy*)./
>
> If I see /minerals /equivalent to /galaxies/, the hyp. e/lectroweak 
> monopole/ could have an equivalent effect on molecules, namely that he 
> increases the distances between
> molecule-clusters within minerals. This slight increasing of distances 
> between molecules make their electron-orbitals behave a bit different, 
> so that tidal-patterns
>
> occure in their UPE.
>
>
> _*My question:*_
>
> Do minerals build something like /molecule clusters/, similary to 
> galaxies which build galaxy clusters ?
>
> Because /"dark energy"/ (also named: /Kundalini /or /consciousness/) 
> would show its influence on space in between "/clusters/" and not 
> directly within molecules or atoms.
>
>
> I hope I could explain, what I mean. Sorry for my poor english.
>
>
> best regards,
>
> Hubert
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Von:* General 
> <general-bounces+defiantncc001=hotmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> 
> im Auftrag von Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 21. August 2016 22:27
> *An:* general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission
>
> very interesting thank you
>
> I'm not familiar enough with the QED explanations of the differences 
> cited. But the masses used in calculating the angular momentum are 
> typically inertial masses. If we drop the assumption that the mass and 
> charge are co-located point particles there might be an additional 
> factor explaining the differences?
>
> Still not clear to me how this might lead to increased photon 
> emission. Unless we consider a version of Sommerfelds loading theory. 
> This in effect suggests that electrons are held in stable orbits which 
> on the average have radii and energy values measured,There is an 
> action threshold required to cause a jump between states but inside 
> these orbits there is variation without an actual state transition. 
> Then small external perturbation may cause some of the electrons that 
> are still held in their orbits, but not quite over the threshold to 
> make a jump and eject light energy. Perhaps this makes sense to someone?
>
> best, wolf
>
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mailwolf at NascentInc.com
> On 8/20/2016 10:20 PM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:
>>
>> Can such a /hyp. gravitationally coupled electroweak monopole/ be 
>> responsible for the higher uncertainty of the /g-factor/ within 
>> nucleons ?
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_(physics)#Measured_g-factor_values 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_%28physics%29#Measured_g-factor_values>
>>
>> Gesendet von Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> 
>> für Windows 10
>>
>> *Von: *Defiant NCC001 <mailto:defiantncc001 at hotmail.com>
>> *Gesendet: *Samstag, 20. August 2016 10:58
>> *An: *general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org 
>> <mailto:general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
>> *Betreff: *AW: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission
>>
>> To whom it may concern,
>>
>> Yesterday I talked to a physicist about this topic and from his 
>> perspective: It can be excluded that gravity directly causes 
>> tidal-effects within UPE of wheat-seedlings.
>>
>> I am not an expert on QCD or QEDand therefore I want to ask a question.
>>
>> Its about /gravitationally/ /coupled/ /electroweak magnetic monopoles./
>>
>> See this document:
>>
>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.08129v1.pdf
>>
>> *page 1 after the first paragraph:* *_Citation:_*
>>
>> Indeed the /Dirac monopole/ in /electrodynamics/ should transform to 
>> the /electroweak monopole/ after the unification of the 
>> /electromagnetic/ and /weak interactions/, and /Wu-Yang monopole/ in 
>> /QCD/ is supposed to make the /monopole/ condensation to *confine the 
>> color*.
>>
>> *_I am thinking about the _**_following hyp. possibility:_*
>>
>> Depending on the /gravity-pull/ of the moon, the hyp. /monopole/ 
>> changes its size a bit. And by doing this, certain /gluon-*colors* 
>> /are also change. I hypothesize that the /gluon-process/ in the atom 
>> are like a gyroskop and this /gravitational coupling/ creates a 
>> slight */color-precession/* within the atom. I hypothesize that under 
>> normal circumbstances this "/precession-effect/" doesn´t disturb the 
>> known laws of /'QCD/ and /QED/. Which means that an isolated atom is 
>> behaving like expected.
>>
>> But if I now put atoms into a compound of atoms (like within a 
>> /crystal-lattice/), the /gravity-pull/ of the moon could syncronize 
>> this hyp. "/precession//-effect/" of each atom within the 
>> /crystall-lattice/.
>>
>> Resulting in the effect that, depeding on the /gravit//y-pull/ of the 
>> moon, the electron shells of the crystals sometimes react more or 
>> less sensitive to UPE.
>>
>> Could such an effect (at least) somehow exist ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Hubert
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wolfgang Baer
>> Sent: Aug 14, 2016 4:49 PM
>> To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org, Beverly Rubik
>> Subject: Re: [General] Gravity and ultraweak-photonemission
>>
>> Hubert
>>
>> I've come into contact with a number of claims that connect 
>> gravitation with local Electromagnetic phenomena.
>>
>> Obviously is the detection of gravity waves recently announced.
>>
>> Regibald Cahill also claims random number generators based on the 
>> Zener diode are actually not random but effected by gravity. I've not 
>> been able to reproduce his experiment but am working on it.
>>
>> REcently an Italian group has connected proton emission from stressed 
>> iron being linked to the Cosmic background radiation cold spot.
>>
>> I feel here is a connection but it is difficult to trust results, 
>> good low level photon experiments are difficult to perform and can 
>> easily be misread let alone interpreted. In this case could other 
>> rhythms offer alternative explanations or correlations?
>>
>> I've cc this to Ms Rubik who is familiar with these emission effects. 
>> It would be good to gather a shit load of empirical data on these 
>> phenomena so if you know any other experiments along these lines 
>> please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> wolf
>>
>> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>> Research Director
>> Nascent Systems Inc.
>> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>>
>> On 8/13/2016 11:50 PM, Defiant NCC001 wrote:
>>
>>     To whom it may concern,
>>
>>     A couple of months ago, I found the following article:
>>
>>     Spontaneous ultra-weak light emissions from wheat seedlings are
>>     rhythmic and synchronized with the time profile of the local
>>     gravimetric tide
>>
>>     http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-012-0921-5
>>
>>     This article demonstrates an interaction between tides
>>     (gravitational influence of the moon) and emission of /ultraweak
>>     photons/
>>
>>     How can such a phenomenon be explained ?
>>
>>     Best regards,
>>
>>     Hubert
>>
>>     Gesendet von Mail
>>     <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>für Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>
>>     If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of
>>     Light and Particles General Discussion List at
>>     Wolf at nascentinc.com <mailto:Wolf at nascentinc.com>
>>
>>     <a
>>     href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
>>     <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
>>
>>     Click here to unsubscribe
>>
>>     </a>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List atWolf at nascentinc.com
>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160822/f6ee650c/attachment.htm>

More information about the General mailing list