[General] Matter comprised of light-speed energy

Vivian Robinson viv at universephysics.com
Wed Jun 1 17:01:08 PDT 2016


On 02/06/2016, at 12:09 AM, Chip Akins <chipakins at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear John Williamson and Martin van der Mark
>  
> Your 1997 paper on the electron may have had a much greater influence than you thought.
>  
> The aspect of this which I would like to address is the simple premise that matter is made from confined light-speed energy.
>  
> If this is true then there is only one form of “relativity” which can be supported.
> The consequences of matter being comprised of confined light-speed energy lead to inescapable conclusions regarding “relativity”.
>  
> Are there comments from the group?
>  
> Chip
>  
> From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir Tamari
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 9:30 PM
> To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
> Subject: Re: [General] inertia
>  
>  
> Richard, 
>  
> without going into the details of your model, you mentioned:
>  
> "It may be that vector momentum is just not conserved within fundamental particles even though it is conserved between two or more particles in their mutual interactions"
>  
> In cellular-automata schemes, such as my Beautiful Universe,  a particle is made up of a pattern of spinning nodes in a matrix. The same type of spinning nodes also form the surrounding magnetic, gravitational or electrostatic field etc.  Any changes in the angular momentum or the axis of spin of the constituent nodes of a particle (or photon wave) is transmitted as a domino effect adjusting the angular momentum of surrounding nodes both internally and externally. The domino effect is diffused unto infinity in inverse-square fashion. Nothing is hidden or lost or subject to uncertainty, and energy is always conserved. 
>  
> In your case by taking the photon and electron in isolation conservation issues seem to be arising? Hope this helps.
> Best wishes
> Vladimir
>  
>  
> From: richgauthier at gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 17:31:33 -0700
> To: general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> CC: jsarfatti at aol.com
> Subject: Re: [General] inertia
> 
> Hello all,
>   I’ve been thinking about the unexplained 0.424 Newtons force acting on a circulating double-looped charged photon to keep it in its trajectory. Any double-looping-photon electron model should have this force acting on the circling photon, such John and Martin’s model and Chip’s model.  The force doesn’t have an obvious source. It continuously changes the direction of the circling momentum without changing the resting energy of the photon. It may be that vector momentum is just not conserved within fundamental particles even though it is conserved between two or more particles in their mutual interactions. I believe that the Dirac equation solution for a free electron hints at this internal non-conservation of momentum  also during zitterbewegung motion of the free electron whose average velocity is v but whose eigenvalue for speed is c. The position-momentum relations for the double-looped photon model of the electron, as I recall, are below or just at the  the exact uncertainty expression of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: delta x  times delta p > 1/2   hbar , for position and momentum of an object in a particular coordinate direction. So it might not be possible to experimentally determine if linear momentum is conserved or not within a particle. The indirect evidence that there is such circulating momentum in a particle is the inertial mass m=Eo/c^2 of the particle as it is derived from the photon’s circulating momentum p=Eo/c . If there is circling momentum for a single particle, then momentum conservation within the particle IS being violated. An analogy: just as an electron has spin but it not experimentally known what inside it is “spinning", an electron has inertial mass but it is not known what inside the particle is “massing”. But but the spin and the inertial mass are known experimentally. A double-looping photon model explains both what is “spinning" and what is “massing" in an electron.
>      Richard
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160602/de23811d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Proposed electron structure.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 763385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160602/de23811d/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160602/de23811d/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the General mailing list