[General] STOE model of the electron spin 1/2 observation

[John]

 http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1735  
click om mse50.pdf

\begin{abstract}
The Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model posits the bizarre features of the quantum mechanics model of the small scale should have analogies in the classical scale. One such feature of the quantum model is the model of ``spin 1/2'' observation of the Stern-Gerlach experiment. The STOE model of the structure of electron using disc magnets as an analogy of hods suggests multiple North--South poles produce the ``spin'' observation. The electron analogy is placed in an inhomogeneous magnetic field and the change of orientation is photographed. Noting that the re-orientating always occurs implies no electron will travel straight through the magnetic field. Thus, the STOE models another quantum feature, the spin 1/2 effect. 
\end{abstract}

The STOE is a self-consistant model that has been applied to the large scale and is now being applied to the small scale.

The STOE proposal is that the hod has a magnetic field rather than a rotating electric field. Other quantum mechanics bizarre features explained by the STOE are the wave-particle duality, Young's Experiment (diffraction, interference), Hodge's Experiment (rejects all other models of light diffraction),  entanglement, photon (particle) polarization, inertia, derivation of the Equivalence Principle, and photons and neutrino have the greatest speed of particles (speed of light). 

The STOE also explained many cosmological mysteries. 

The next step in the progression of examining bizarre quantum assumptions is to model charge using the STOE proposals that the universe consists of only two constituents and the Fractal Principle. What is the characteristic of the plenum, hod, or their interaction that produces the observation of charge? Perhaps, how a particle has a positive or negative charge may be found through the electron and positron structural differences. 

This is very conceptual. For a century, physics of the small has been math first, interpretation second. Math first has resulted in the bizarre QM features. Perhaps physics should turn to conceptualizing first as the Reality Principle and its corollary, the Fractal Principle, suggests. 

Hodge

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20160624/9c5e1ab2/attachment.htm>