[General] [NEW] SRT twin Paradox

[Wolfgang Baer]

Dear John W,  Grahame nd Albrecht:

I cannot let this request for help go unanswered:

I do not believe we have a any fundamental disagreement with the twin 
paradox. It never was anything more than a semantic problem. If two 
twins with identical and locally synchronized clocks are set on equal 
circular orbits in opposite directions and meet again and compare 
clocks, I believe it is an experimental fact that the clocks will run at 
the same rate (neglecting solar gravity if experiments are conducted 
near earth)


	
	
	

	


	
	

Fig 1


The appearance of a twin paradox in my opinion is completely due to 
Einstein’s sloppy writing. In his 1905 paper, which I looked up, he 
explicitly stated that a clock making a round trip at velocity “v” will 
slow down compared with a stationary observer. The argument that both 
observers applying Einstein’s theory would NOT come to this paradoxical 
conclusion is based on an interpretation by a host of well meaning 
physicists of Einstein’s original paper that suggests that each 
observer, knowing relativity would use this knowledge analyze the 
situation as shown in figure 1 above and therefore not expect the other 
clock to slow down. As Kracklauer correctly pointed out that there is an 
original SRT that had the twin paradox people justly criticized Einstein 
for it and a slightly revised SRT that explains it away is usually not 
mentioned. I think we all understand this and I have no argument with 
Albrecht on this point.

Now however I insist that the speed of light is NOT constant because it 
depends upon the situation the material (observer material) finds itself 
in a gravitational field. As long as the field in that material is 
fairly homogeneous the speed of light in that observers material is 
representative of the speed of EM interactions and is constant. And 
recognizing this dependency is critical to making progress in physics by 
eliminating the crazy adjustments to classical physics the wrog 
interpretation of bith SRT and GRT has hoisted upon us.

Now Albrecht correctly states that synchrotron experiments show that the 
speed of light is constant and the mass is varying.




	

Fig 2


Now we have the situation of a charged particle traveling around a 
circular orbit. Like the Bohr model of the Hydrogen atom, except much 
faster. Now my CAT theory assumes that charge and mass are held together 
by a Force that I have introduced for example in the Vigier 9 paper. 
This means the internal structure of the orbiting electron would be 
expanded and the extra energy is stored not in a mass increase but in 
the stretch of the spring metaphorically holding the two together.

Interestingly enough both particles woul exhibit an internal rotation I 
believe is spin. I think I could duplicate Sommerfelds fine structure 
correction but have not had the time to do so and *would welcome help*.


But I thing I have a new and better interpretation od both SRT and GRT - 
I've been trying to get this across to Albrecht and I believe we now 
have tangible analysis problem before us to resolve our disagreement


So let me steer the conversation to this new challenge


Best wishes

Wolf



Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 8/25/2017 7:48 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:

Dear John W and Grahame,


I think that I should explain a bit about this discussion between Wolf 
and myself. Why this discussion is as it is.


I find the topic of Wolf about conciousness very interesting and very 
important. So I have continued with this discussion. But, unfortunately 
in my view, Wolf is basing his thoughts on a wrong understanding of 
relativity. The finds that this "incorrect" theory 'SRT' is an 
indication of our human failure to understand physics and so of our 
misleading consciousness. - But not SRT is incorrect (as some of you 
have already and repeatedly written) but Wolf's understanding is wrong. 
- I am trying to give Wolf a correct understanding as a precondition for 
a successful development of the issue of consciousness. I see that this 
may be boring for those who have understood relativity. But what else 
can we do to get ahead?

Any ideas?

Albrecht

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170825/fab5c3a7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clip_image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1459 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170825/fab5c3a7/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clip_image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2407 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170825/fab5c3a7/attachment-0001.gif>