[General] On photon momentum
Dr Grahame Blackwell
grahame at starweave.com
Mon Jan 30 07:49:36 PST 2017
Andrew,
A "detailed explanation" is NOT a definition - this is virtually axiomatic.
If a clear definition exists, then I'd be happy to see that, I don't need a detailed explanation.
As I said in my last email, a definition is unlikely to require more than three lines. If it takes more than three lines then it's most unlikely to be a definition but rather a rationalisation in terms of other things - which is not what I'm asking for.
If the concept is valid then there should be a plausible definition of it - simple as that.
Grahame
----- Original Message -----
From: "ANDREW WORSLEY" <member at aworsley.fsnet.co.uk>
To: "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [General] On photon momentum
> Hi Grahame,
>
> I did a detailed explanation
>
> the final answer was for photons p = hf/c or p= hn/c if you read my email.
>
> Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170130/8e652426/attachment.htm>
More information about the General
mailing list