[General] On photon momentum

[Dr Grahame Blackwell]

Andrew,

A "detailed explanation" is NOT a definition - this is virtually axiomatic.

If a clear definition exists, then I'd be happy to see that, I don't need a detailed explanation.
As I said in my last email, a definition is unlikely to require more than three lines.  If it takes more than three lines then it's most unlikely to be a definition but rather a rationalisation in terms of other things - which is not what I'm asking for.

If the concept is valid then there should be a plausible definition of it  - simple as that.

Grahame



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ANDREW WORSLEY" <member at aworsley.fsnet.co.uk>
To: "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [General] On photon momentum


> Hi Grahame,
> 
> I did a detailed explanation
> 
> the final answer was for photons p = hf/c or p= hn/c if you read my email.
> 
> Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170130/8e652426/attachment.htm>