[General] About light anyone?

[Eric Reiter]

I agree with Chandra's recent post.  To you photon fans, please be advised: There are good ways to see the photoelectric, Compton, and other QM effects with pure wave-light and with thresholds in matter.  Besides, the wave function of QM by any photon model, would need to go everywhere and then magically collapse... And for any QM particle.  What was missing (until now) were two things:  (1) experimental refutation of QM for light AND matter, and (2) a consistent model for what is going on.   We agree matter is made of energy, but the way matter holds itself together differs from light.  I prefer to call the matter-wave psi... Schrodinger's. 
 How about some feedback on my 2016 paper, addressing (1) & (2). Eric___________________________ 
 
 On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra<chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu> wrote:  _______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at unquant at yahoo.com
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/unquant%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170503/2bed20cd/attachment.htm>