[General] gravity

[Wolfgang Baer]

John

I think you have a great idea and if it were developed to the point 
where people could visualize such an experiment it would be a paper that 
could and should pass a peer review and get published

If you are serious and want to get published in a worth while journal 
the paper must include enough of the development work to make it worth 
while.

As I mentioned before I suggest you read Kopeikin , S. M. (2004) The 
speed of gravity in general relativity and theoretical interpretation of 
the Jovian deflection experiment, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Vol.21 
#13 10 june 2004

I think you will find it by searching the net along with comments. and 
rebuttals - its a research project.

Kopeikin wanted to measure the speed of gravity and tried to show it was 
equal to the speed of light. His success is controversial. You have a 
different goal in mind, however I believe the details of his experiment 
is a detailed description of the experiment you are proposing and 
rephrasing it in your words would give you half the paper. THe other 
half would be how you intend  interpret the result of this experiment to 
prove your idea.

Hope this helps

wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 5/30/2017 7:12 PM, Hodge John wrote:
>
> Intellectual Archive. Online/offline repository for works in science 
> and art <http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1847>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>     Intellectual Archive. Online/offline repository for works in
>     science and art
>
> Protect your intellectual property, publish and distribute to 
> libraries your works in science and arts.
> 	
>
> <http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1847>
>
>
> Gravity experiment proposal to unite quantum mechanics and general 
> relativity
>
> \begin{abstract}
> Unifying the concepts of quantum mechanics (QM) and General Relativity 
> (GR) remains an unsolved modeling problem. The prevailing model of GR 
> is that gravitational potential is propagated as only the inverse 
> distance from matter and without inertia. The Bohm Interpretation of 
> QM has the proposition of an inertial pilot wave in a medium directing 
> particles with diffraction (inertial) characteristics. Testing the 
> similarity between the gravitational potential and the pilot wave 
> requires showing that gravity does indeed propagate as an inertial 
> wave rather than as only a change in potential without oscillation. 
> The suggested experiment may measure diffraction of inertial gravity 
> waves.
>
> Wolf: I doubt a peer reviewed journal would publish such a deviation 
> from status quo.
>
> Hodge
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20170530/9db3ea6b/attachment.htm>