[General] The CTF and NIW

Hodge John jchodge at frontier.com
Sun Nov 5 01:36:04 PST 2017


Chandra:Did you do the Rb-beam experiment?I suggest the key purpose of physics (science) is to understand (predict outcomes of events) and to have the wisdom (ability to cause events) to use the understanding. QM without a causal or visualize-able model can serve this purpose. But causal is better and more likely to yield wisdom.
Your 2017 conference paperNote that the STOE model also does not have zeros in the interference part of the double-slit pattern. However, in the experiment of Fig. 6 of vixra 1509.0107 "Light diffraction experiments that confirm the STOE model (a force of interaction model) and reject all other models" that with $a_1 >>a_2$ (even if one of the cos coefficients =0 ) the interference fringes are still visible.
I have thought that your CTF is similar to my "plenum". My current attention is to identify spectrograph and polarizing (later reflection and refraction) behavior. So:RE: your paper "Next Frontier in Physics -- Space as a Complex tension field", 4.1 1)Spectrometry The equations used are solutions of the wave equation. They are wave equations. But this implies there must be some action to keep the wave oscillation through the zero point. In media such as strings and water this is the property of inertia. Without the property of inertia, the CTF fails to present a "wave" (solution to the wave equation). This seems to imply the Fourier monochromatic wave through the kinetic energy and as a solution of the wave equation DOES obey the principle of conservation of energy. So, the Dirac's statement that photons interfere only with itself is partly correct. This can be modified to photons interfere with itself and with others that have an equal energy (frequency). Experimentally, single photon diffraction has been observed. Entanglement is a frequency resonance effect if the CTF wave can travel very much faster than light. I note your view of gravitation and the inertia in the CTF could derive the Equivalence Principle, which would require monochromatic wave to conserve energy. 
The $\Psi$ of QM is a "physical dipolar undulation amplitude" - a real wave. If $\Psi$ is propagating forward in space and time, what is $Psi^*$? Hodge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20171105/dbab3c0a/attachment.html>


More information about the General mailing list