[General] Maxwell's

[Chip Akins]

Hi Hodge

 

Regarding the model of space I have proposed.  It is not really “Chip’s model” because it came from work done by Lorentz, Poincare, John Stewart Bell, Chandra, and many others.  I have just found a way (with the help of a suggestion from David Mathes) to put these ideas and pieces together in a way which presents causal solutions. 

 

The model describes charge and magnetic fields, the strong force and gravity, “pilot waves” and double slit experiments, momentum and mass, spin of bosons and fermions, Maxwell’s equations, the appearance of relativity, quantization of charge, quantization of particles, inertia, the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass, and more.  All from the properties of space as a two component tension medium.

 

Regarding particles originating from magnetic fields; I think we need to describe the cause for, and microscopic nature of magnetism before we can try to build particles from magnetism.  However the model I have proposed suggests that magnetic fields are due to the same displacements of space which cause electric fields.  Magnetic fields are due to the gradient between displaced and non-displaced regions of these spinning displacements, and electric fields are due to the mean displacement. So the forces of these fields are naturally perpendicular. Charge is caused by longitudinal displacement, magnetic fields are caused by transverse motion of longitudinal displacement regions. But at the particle level, the fields are inseparable, because they are caused by the same thing.  When we move electrons in a wire, we are inducing a magnetic field simply because we are causing a component of “uniform” transverse motion to be added to the spinning displacements which cause charge.

 

So this model suggests that there is a correlation between the displacements which cause particles and the magnetic fields of particles, but that magnetism is a result of those conditions, and not in any way a sole cause of those conditions. Which brings me to feel that particles are not formed by tiny magnets, but rather that particles (when formed by energy longitudinally displacing space toward the particle core, and these displacements spin due to the properties of space) cause tiny magnetic fields (as well as electric fields).

 

Chip

 

 

From: General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] On Behalf Of Hodge John
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2017 3:39 AM
To: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Subject: [General] Maxwell's

 

Andre

I was intrigued by your reference to kinetic energy.

Maxwell's equations are held virtually unimpeachable in today's environment. They were derived from several experiments. The assumption of these interpretations was that a charge is the primal source of the phenomena. This leads to Chip's model. But the Stern-Gerlack experiment and the infinite speed of the coulomb experiment present problems. 

So the question of kinetic energy transforms into the interpretation of Maxwell's equation experiments. Suppose the acting element/photon/electron were a magnet. That is, a photon is a magnet when moving produces the electric field that travels laterally at infinite speed.

 

The issue then becomes to re-derive Maxwell's equations from the experiments. 

 

Hodge

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20171105/ffd57443/attachment.html>