[General] FQXi Essay on "Fundamental"

[Wolfgang Baer]

Dear Chandra:

The FQXI essay you sent metitle “The concept of “fundamental” must keep evolving “**is very interesting I believe a very
  good topic for our discussion group as well as complimenting my own submission title “Adding the Observer to the
Foundations of Physics by Wolfgang Baer”

  https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043

I only have my URL but recommend anyone interested can navigate to your 
paper which is listed alphabetically by last name.

Now to my comments: Your introduction states the general principles most 
of us in our discussion group agree on, and I like it. But doubt whether 
the references to MDM-E and IPM-E, which I am familiar with,will make 
sense to a general audience.

  The basic assumption is stated in section IIc. “There exists only one 
physically stationary /inertial /frame of reference in this universe, 
which is the stationary CTF. The Complex Tension Filed (CTF)” and a bit 
earlier you state “This is where we introduce a new physical postulate. 
The basic elementary particles (electrons. protons, neutrons, etc.) are 
some form of localized complex EM waves, executing harmonic 
oscillations, but in the shape of a doughnut or similar vortex-like 
stable structure. The stability of these /field-particles /comes from 
their /resonant or in-phase /self-looped oscillations.”

  I think this is a great idea and one that many of our group is 
essentially following as you provided a reference #4 to our discussion 
group. This leads me to a question I’ve had for a long time, Is there a 
reference preferably a paper you can send that will show how stable 
/field-particles/can be created from CTF properties. I agree donut like 
vortecies are a good candidate but is there physics involved or is the 
existence of such stable self generating oscillations an additional 
postulate?

  Lets assume field particles exist. On page 5 we get to some thing very 
interesting “Within a given material medium, closely spaced assembly of 
/field-particles/, the effective value of /εμ /increases, thereby 
reducing the velocity of EM waves to /c//med. //= (1/εμ)//1/2 /within 
this assembly.” This to me sounds like an aether definition as an 
underlying assembly of space cells (you call /field-particles/) similar 
to Bohm’s underlying space cell as infinitesimal clocks.

  Here we transition to My paper and concept that we physical beings 
/are/ an aggregation of fundamental space particles which makes us a 
material based space and in that sense each of us is a Universe of our 
own experiences we believe is the real one. I’ve been trying to get this 
across to Albrecht for a long time. We are a closely spaced assembly of 
/field-particles/in your terminology. and this assembly of elementary 
oscillations is a field of self-explanatory measurement activities in 
which the speed of light is always a constant characteristic of ourselves.

  I know it sounds a bit odd if you are used to thinking there is an 
independent external world that we observe through the windows of our 
senses- but it is very likely that we are a self-explanatory measurement 
cycle which contains within itself the appearances we experience as 
every day objects and these appearances my be aggregations of 
filed-particle states and you have identified the physics. So I’m excited.

  Lastly I have a question about the experiment. Is the earth not a 
satellite moving through space at high velocity in a direction 
determined by the cosmic background radiation red /blue shift? And if so 
would your experiment not simply be a Michelson Morely type where the 
satellite velocity relative to the direction of the pulsed laser and 
detector array is changed by rotating the beam on which these end points 
are mounted. So should we not see a relative phase shift when the slate 
slab on mercury is rotated. Or are you assuming pulses are different 
from phase and in today’s world we can actually measure pulse deviations?

Great Paper

Thanks

Wolf

Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com

On 2/4/2018 4:48 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra wrote:
>
> Wolf:
>
> I have just accessed the abstract of your essay and read it.
>
> It is excellent and well written.
>
> I will grade it after read the full article.
>
> In the meantime, here is my article to look at, if you are interested.
>
> Fundamentally, I see that we are essentially in agreement.
>
> However, our approaches to create a better path is just slightly 
> different.
>
> But, that is very healthy since we are all “Blinds trying to make 
> model of the Cosmic Elephant”.
>
> Chandra.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180207/e97aa285/attachment.html>