[General] Foundational questions Tension field stable particles
Wolfgang Baer
wolf at nascentinc.com
Tue Feb 20 20:35:49 PST 2018
Chandra:
I think the first question I would want to ask is whether the idea of
making charge and mass elementary makes sense
I ask this because so many of our participants are attempting to derive
these quantities from the more fundamental principles.
Then I would ask is there any traction in recognizing an internal side
of matter in addition to the past and future side?
As far as 4-D space time , I think putting time on a spatial dimension
and calling it the 4'th dimension is confusing the actuality of change
with the way we display phenomena, Time is simply the state of a system
we use as a clock, which traditionally is the whole gravity driven
universe of stars, time intervals such as a second is a measure of the
amount of change required to go from one state to another - the 4th
dimension concept has always been a confusion between the map and the
territory.
The flow of charge around a circle produces a self contained doughnut of
magnetic field - this makes me think cold mass have a similar
characteristic and are we moving along with our mass aong a cycle in time
Best
wolf
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
On 2/20/2018 3:00 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra wrote:
>
> /“We nee//d a geometry in which both space and time are curved back on
> themselves to provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi, Fcm,Fmc
> are self contained eigen states at each action quanta. /
>
> /Does any of this suggest a tension field you might be thinking about??”/
>
> Yes, Wolf, we need to model mathematically the “twists and turns” of
> different intrinsic potential gradients embedded in CTF (Complex
> Tension Field) to create stationary self-looped oscillations
> (*/field-particles/*). Maxwell achieved that for the propagating
> linear excitations using his brilliant observations of using the
> double differentiation – giving us the EM wave equation. We need to
> find non-propagating (stationary – Newton’s first law) self-looped
> oscillations – the in-phase ones will be stable, others will “break
> apart” with different life-times depending upon how far they are from
> the in-phase closed-loop conditions. The successes of the mathematical
> oscillatory dynamic model could be judged by the number of predicted
> properties the theory can find for the */field-particles,/* which we
> have measured so far. The physical CTF must remain stationary holding
> 100% of the cosmic energy.
>
> However, I would not attempt to keep the primacy of Relativity by
> trying to keep the Space-Time 4-D concept intact. If we want to
> capture the ontological reality; we must imagine and visualize the
> potential */foundational/* physical process and represent that with a
> set of algebraic symbols and call them the primary parameters of
> “different grades”. During constructing mathematical theories, it is
> of prime importance to introduce consciously this concept of
> “primary”, vs. “secondary”, vs. “tertiary”, etc., physical parameters
> related to any observable physical phenomenon. The physical parameter
> that dictates the core existence of an entity in nature should be
> considered as primary. However, it is not going to be easy because of
> the complexities in the different interaction processes – different
> parameters take key role in transferring the energy in different
> interactions. Besides, our ignorance is still significantly broad
> compared to the “validated” knowledge we have gathered about our
> universe. Here is a glaring example. νλ = c = (1/ϵµ). If I am doing
> atomic physics, ν is of primary importance because of the quantum
> resonance with ν and the QM energy exchange rule is “hν”. “λ”
> changes from medium to medium. If I am doing Astrophysics, ϵ and µ for
> free space, are of primary significance; even though people tend to
> use “c”, while missing out the fundamental roles of ϵ and µ as some of
> the core building blocks of the universe. Funny thing is that the ϵ
> and µ of free space were recognized well before Maxwell synthesized
> Electromagnetism.
>
> With this background, I want underscore that the “running time,
> “t” is of critical importance in our formulation of the dynamic
> universe. And, yet “t’ is not a directly measurable physical parameter
> of any object in this universe. What we measure is really the
> frequency, or its inverse, the oscillation periods of different
> physical oscillators in this universe. So, frequency can be dilated or
> contracted by controlling the ambient physical parameter of the
> environment that surrounds and INFLUENCES the oscillator. The running
> time cannot be dilated or contracted; even though Minkowsky introduced
> this “dilation” concept. This is the reason why I have been pushing
> for the introduction in physics thinking the Interaction Process
> Mapping Epistemology (IPM-E).
>
> Chandra.
>
> *From:*General
> [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]*On
> Behalf Of *Wolfgang Baer
> *Sent:* Monday, February 19, 2018 10:56 PM
> *To:* general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
> *Subject:* Re: [General] Foundational questions Tension field stable
> particles
>
> Candra:
>
> Let’s consider your tension filed is a medium underlying the
> experience of space composed of charge and mass density spread out in
> the cross-section of a time loop.. Coordinate frame cells of /small
> enough/ sizes can be described by constant enough mass and charge
> densities in each cell. For small enough cells the mass and charge
> values concentrated at their centers may be used in stead of the
> densities. The resulting field of center values can take any pattern
> that satisfies the extended dAlambert principle. Besides the classic
> electro-magnetic Fem and gravito-inertial force Fgi I postulate forces
> tat hold charge and mass together Fcm, Fmc. This condition assures
> mass charge centers in each cell appear at locations of balanced
> forces. Each pattern which satisfies this condition represents a
> static state of the loop in which the patterns are fixed for the
> lifetime of the loop.
>
> **
>
> *The Charge-Mass Separation Vector and Equilibrium States*
>
> The physical size of the space is its volume. The volume (Vol) of
> space is the sum of the infinitesimal volumes dVol of each of the
> cells composing that space “Vol = ∫_all space dVol”. These
> infinitesimal volumes are calculated from the mass-charge density
> extensions in each cell when viewed externally as shown in figure
> 4.3-3a . The physical volume depends upon the mass charge separation
> pattern of the equilibrium state the system being modeled exists in.
>
> In CAT the extension of a cell can be calculated as
> follows. In each cell the distance between the center of charge and
> mass is a vector d*ζ.* The projection of this vector onto the degrees
> of freedom directions available for the charge and mass to move in the
> generalized coordinate space allows us to expansion this vector as,
>
> Eq. 4.3-1 *dζ =* dζ_t *∙u_t * + dζ_x *∙u_x *+ dζ_y *∙u_y *+ dζ_z *∙u_z
> +…* dζ_f *∙u_f +…,*
>
> **where the *u_f *’s are the unit vectors. A space limited to
> Cartesian 3-space is characterized by three x,y,z directions, but CAT
> models a generalized space that encompasses all sensor modalities not
> only the optical ones.
>
> The volume of a cell calculated from the diagonal
> expansion vector “*dζ”* by multiplying all non zero coefficients,
>
> Eq. 4.3-2 dVol = dζ_t *∙*dζ_x *∙*dζ_y *∙*dζ_z
> *∙…∙*dζ_f *∙… .*
>
> The shape of this volume is determined by the direction of
> the expansion vector which in turn is determined by the direction and
> strength of forces pulling the charge and mass apart. The direction of
> pull depends upon the number of dimensions available in the
> generalized coordinates of the media. The forces must be in
> equilibrium but exact equilibrium pattern depends upon which global
> loop equilibrium state “Ζ” the event being modeled is in.
>
> In the simplest equilibrium state the masses and charges
> are collocated. This implies the internal forward propagating in time
> forces F_cm ,F_mc , and backward propagating in time force F_mc *,F_cm
> * are zero, and if there are no internal force pulling the charges and
> masses together then sum of the remaining exterior gravito-electric
> forces pulling the charge and mass apart must separately be zero
> precisely at the collocation point. A trivial condition that satisfies
> these equations is when all forces are zero. In this case there is no
> action in the media and no action for expanding the coordinate frame
> defining a volume of space. We are back to a formless blob of zero
> volume, where all charges and masses are at the same point. This is
> the absolute ground state of material, one level of something above
> nothing. The big bang before the energy of action flow is added.
>
> To exemplify the methods we consider an equilibrium state of a single
> isolated cell whose only degree of freedom is the time direction. This
> means the volume in all space directions are infinitesimally small and
> the volume can be considered a single line of extension “ΔVol = ΔT_w =
> ∫dζ_t “ along the time direction as shown in the god’s eye perspective
> of figure 4.3-6. In this situation we can consider charges and masses
> to be point particles. Forces as well as action can only propagate
> along the material length of the line time line represented in space
> as “Qw”. We now list the sequence of changes that can propagate
> through around the equilibrium positions indicated by numbers in
> parenthesis.
>
> (1)The upper charge is pushed from its equilibrium position (filled
> icon) forward along the time line
>
> (2)It exerts a force “Fem” on the left charge pushing it forward while
> feeling a reaction force “Fem*” that retards it back to its
> equilibrium position
>
> (3)While the left charge is moved from equilibrium it exerts an
> internal “Fcm” force on the bottom mass while feeling a reaction force
> “Fcm*” which returns it to equilibrium.
>
> (4)While the bottom mass is moved from equilibrium it exerts a force
> “Fgi” on the right mass while feeling a reaction force “Fgi*” which
> returns it to equilibrium.
>
> (5)While the right mass is moved from equilibrium it exerts a force
> “Fmc” on the upper charge while feeling a reaction force “Fmc*” which
> returns it to equilibrium. We are now back to (1).
>
> If the system is isolated there is no dissipation into other degrees
> of freedom and the oscillation continues to move as a compression wave
> around the “Qw” time line circumference forever. The graph however is
> static and shows a fixed amount of action indicated by the shaded
> arrows around the time line. Motion in “block” models is produced by
> the velocity of the observer or model operator as he moves around the
> time line. From our god’s eye perspective an action density is
> permanently painted on the clock dial and thereby describes an total
> event. The last degree of freedom events are rather trivial
>
> We need a geometry in which both space and time are curved
> back on themselves to provide a donut in which the forces Fem, Fgi,
> Fcm,Fmc are self contained eigen states at each action quanta.
>
> Does any of this suggest a tension field you might be thinking about??
>
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
> Research Director
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
> E-mailwolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>
> On 1/24/2018 7:20 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra wrote:
>
> 1. Yes, I have submitted an essay. FQXi has not sent the approval
> link yet.
>
> 2. Replacement of our SPIE conf. Without a supporting
> infrastructure to replace SPIE-like support, it is very difficult
> to manage. I will try NSF during the last week of May. Do you want
> to start negotiating with some out-of-box European groups?
>
> 3. Re-starting afresh from the bottom up is the only way to start
> re-building a unified field theory. It is futile to force-fit
> whole bunch of different theories that were structured differently
> at different states of human cultural epoch.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com
> <mailto:wolf at nascentinc.com>> wrote:
>
> Chandra:
>
> Just rereading your 2015 paper "Urgency of evolution..."
>
> I love the sentiment " This is a good time to start
> iteratively re-evaluating and restructuring all the
> foundational postulates behind all the working theories"
>
> Did you write a paper for FQXi?
>
> I sent one in https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3043
>
> Is there any chance to get a replacement for the SPIE
> conference, one that would expand the questions
>
> beyond the nature of light?
>
> Wolf
>
> --
>
> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>
> Research Director
>
> Nascent Systems Inc.
>
> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>
> E-mailwolf at NascentInc.com <mailto:wolf at NascentInc.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature
> of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
> chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu
> <mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri at uconn.edu>
> <a
> href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/chandra.roychoudhuri%40uconn.edu?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List atWolf at nascentinc.com <mailto:Wolf at nascentinc.com>
>
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
>
> Click here to unsubscribe
>
> </a>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at Wolf at nascentinc.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180220/bfa28e73/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3622 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180220/bfa28e73/attachment.gif>
More information about the General
mailing list