[General] CLASSICAL,QUANTUM MECHANICS

[Andrew Meulenberg]

Dear Andre,

Thank you for providing the link to your paper. I'm only 1/10 the way thru
it and have already found 1/2 dozen points (with references) that are
important bases to my views of physics. It is nice to know that some of
them have historical precedent. I have 2 papers, which I need to publish,
that can use yours as a reference.

Andrew M.
_ _ _

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 PM, André Michaud <srp2 at srpinc.org> wrote:

> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> To your first question,
>
> From equation (5-22) and afferent text, page 132 in reference "Quantum
> Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles - Second
> edition", by R. Eisberg and R.Resnick, Schrödinger's equation had an
> imaginary part from the get go.
>
> Initially, Schrödinger meant the wave function to represent a resonance
> volume within which the localized electron remained captive when in bound
> state:
>
> http://file.scirp.org/Html/17-7503469_84158.htm
>
> Best Regards
>
> André
> ---
> André Michaud
> GSJournal admin
> http://www.gsjournal.net/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
> http://www.srpinc.org/
>
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 19:25:17 -0700, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Nina Sotina's paper in The Vigier 10 proceedings points out something
> that has puzzled me for a long time. Schroedinger's 1926 paper introducing
> the Wave function was a real classic function not an imaginary. In october
> 1926 Von Madelung derived a classic hydrodynamic formulation of quantum
> theory but did so from the Schroedinger equation with an imaginary wave
> function. Both Schroedinger's and Madelung's derivation suggests they
> thought QM waves were real, an interpretation, which I tend to favor.
>
> Were and who introduced the imaginary?
>
> 2) Along those lines I just ran into
>
> THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF CLASSICAL QUANTUM MECHANICS by Dr. Randell
> Mills
>
> The guy knows a lot of physics and claims he can explain the results of
> quantum theory from purely classical physics.
>
> His claim that the electron is a charge shell rather than a probability is
> similar to my CAT theory, only my rational is to
> analyze quantum theory as a mental projection of the observer i.e. as the
> physics of the observer.
>
> Is this guy a bullshitter? Anyone heard of him?
>
> http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory-overview/
>
> Theory Overview:
>
> The claim that classic physics “ only the simple laws of Newton’s
> Mechanics, Maxwell’s equations of electricity, magnetism, and
> electrodynamics, and the fundamental constants of nature” are adequate to
> explain “All observables from quarks to cosmos … in closed-form analytical
> expressions containing fundamental constants only.”
>
> “According to Mills GUT-CP, nature is classical. Electrons, when bound in
> an atom, are considered to be discrete two-dimensional spherical membranes
> of charge and current that completely surround the nucleus as a bubble.”
>
> “Mills GUT-CP is a *confirmable* theory, … Data sets include the electron
> spin, g-factor, ionization energies of 1-20 electron atoms and ions (400
> states); the state lifetimes and line intensities of hydrogen; the excited
> states of helium; the excited states of H2, the relationships between the
> masses of fundamental particles; the bond distances, energies, angles, and
> dipole moments of over 800 molecules; and the parameters of a variety of
> extended solids. From the molecular theory, Brilliant Light Power has
> launched a molecular modeling subsidiary, Millsian Inc
> <http://www.millsian.com/>.
>
> “ The essence of GUTCP is that every solution is for the true or real
> source of the observable wherein any solution of an observable as the
> inherent information for all observables that can be related to that
> observable.”
>
>
>
> *Here is a a site to down load his book*
>
>
>
> *http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf
> <http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/theory/GUT-CP-2016-Ed-Book-Web-121517.pdf>*
>
> --
> Wolfgang Baer
> Nascent Systems Inc.
> 380W. Carmel Valley Rd.
> Carmel Valley, CA 93924 USAWolf at NascentInc.com <Support at NascentInc.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org
>
> Click here to unsubscribe
> <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/srp2%40srpinc.org?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light
> and Particles General Discussion List at mules333 at gmail.com
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-
> natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1
> ">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20180506/1e5c99d3/attachment.html>