[General] Velocity of Gravitation

[Albrecht Giese]

Hello all,

thank you, Richard, for the link. I have looked into the video of 
Michael Tellinger, and I have found surprising thoughts. Examples:

1) Electrons are toroidal shapes of fields; and fields are in his 
understanding primary things, not caused by kind of charges
2) The most important fields are magnetic fields; they are caused by 
sounds; such sounds seem to fill the whole universe
3) The torus shape of these fields originates the shapes of many objects 
in nature; for instance are the shapes of flowers caused by these 
sound-created shapes of magnetic toroidal fields
4) Also cone-shaped  objects are frequent in nature; for instance our 
brain has a lot of cone-shaped components; and all cones in the world 
seem to be connected in a way and have a kind of communication with each 
other
5) He shows a toroidal stone in his presentation; which looks like a 
simple stone but is able to do funny things like making computers in the 
vicinity to crash.

Is this a new physical world?

Albrecht (quite surprised about this)


Am 19.02.2019 um 06:44 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
> Hello all,
>      Here’s an interesting website including a you-tube presentation proposing an alternative view of gravity as a magneto-electric phenomenon, which would have revolutionary implications if its practical anti-gravity demonstrations can be confirmed. It’s at https://michaeltellinger.com/michaels-articles/particle-wave-duality/ . He  proposes torus models of electrons and atoms based on magneto-electric resonance effects.
>         Richard
>
>> On Feb 16, 2019, at 3:28 PM, Wolfgang Baer <wolf at nascentinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> List and Ludwik:
>>
>> questions regarding the  speed of gravity is closely associated to ones model of an "ether"
>>
>> Ludwik Kostro has written an excellent history of Einsteins thinking regarding the nature of space
>>
>> And with this E-mail I am hoping he will share his "Einstein and the ether" book with us.
>>
>> I do not believe any questions of gravity speed can be addressed without taking a stand on the ether question.
>>
>> As some of you may know My own hypothesis is that we must include the observer directly in physics and I think a good case can be made that we conscious systems are fundamentally a space of activity i.e. a self containing ether. That questions of  the speed of light or gravity are directly related to the speed of our individual speed of Now. Having read Ludwik's book I believe Einstein came to the same conclusion but simply could not let go of the independent of ourselves  space concept.
>>
>> wolf
>>
>> Dr. Wolfgang Baer
>> Research Director
>> Nascent Systems Inc.
>> tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
>> E-mail wolf at NascentInc.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com
>> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
>> Click here to unsubscribe
>> </a>
> _______________________________________________
> If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de
> <a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
> Click here to unsubscribe
> </a>

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus