[General] Short summaries of ideas?

[André Michaud]

Hi DataPacRat,

Not sure what your equation aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ relates to, but it sure looks like the momentum energy that converts to the magnetic mass increment of a moving electron. Ref. equation (8) in this recent paper:

https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.95067

By the same token, you might be interested in trying to sink your teeth in this other possible solution that also defines massive elementary particles as self-confined EM fields by having both fields mutually inducing each other, in complete harmony with Maxwell, but within a space geometry that few seem able to fathom.

No need for any calculus to deal with this one. Only a scientific pocket calculator is required.

Best Regards

André

---
André Michaud
"GSJournal admin" <ntham at gsjournal.net>
http://www.gsjournal.net/
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5684
http://www.srpinc.org/






On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:26:00 -0400, DataPacRat wrote:

Hello to the members of this list,

If you don't mind my asking, would it be possible for any of you to
share some short summaries of your approaches and the implications?
I'm afraid that I don't have the mathematical chops to truly
understand most of what I've been able to skim from the list's
archives, but I do write the odd amateur science-fiction story, and I
like being able to add physics details most other SF authours don't.

For example, I might describe one small part of Chip Akins' ideas as
"photons are spiralling ribbons of EM fields, kept together by the
strong nuclear force; neutrinos are the same thing, only with a
different angle of twisting, and electrons the same but circling
around and around". (Which is about as much as I've managed to
assemble so far from the PDFs he's released.) I could do something of
the same with my superficial understanding of quantized inertia (or,
for fun, try to combine QI with Akins' ideas), but I've seen mentions
of other approaches in the archives that I haven't been able to track
down, let alone start reading.

How much can you explain to someone who's forgotten just about all the
techniques of calculus?


Thank you for your time,
--
DataPacRat
"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at srp2 at srpinc.org

Click here to unsubscribe