[General] Light with "self-torque"

Defiant NCC001 defiantncc001 at hotmail.com
Sun Sep 15 23:23:58 PDT 2019 

supplementing ......
It should be a "string-coupled", fast-spinning, deformed magnetic monopole.
The string-coupling should be responsible for the creation of gravity.

________________________________
Von: Defiant NCC001 <defiantncc001 at hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2019 08:11
An: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Betreff: AW: [General] Light with "self-torque"

The term "cosmic egg", "world egg" could refer to a magnetic monopole --> Taijitu, the "supreme pole" or "Kether".
The element out of which the supposed monopole was formed should be "cosmic consciousness" also known as "WuJi", "Shakti", "Ein Sof".

That´s what I think about this issue.
A special type of monopole should be the missing link between consciousness, gravity and qm. (like fast-spinning, deformed magnetic monopole)

kind regards,
Hubert

________________________________
Von: General <general-bounces+defiantncc001=hotmail.com at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> im Auftrag von Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com>
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. August 2019 03:12
An: Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general at lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
Cc: Oreste Caroppo <orestecaroppo at yahoo.it>
Betreff: Re: [General] Light with "self-torque"

Hello all,
     From my academia.edu<http://academia.edu> Cosmic Quantum article discussion session. (The link is below. I encourage you all to join it if you have not already.):

     "Yes, I do think that consciousness and mind play an important role in the cosmic quantum and in quantum mechanics in general. So I think a deeper interpretation of quantum mechanics is still needed. I appreciate Wheeler's "it from bit" approach to the creation of matter ("it") from binary information choices ("bit"). But I suggest rather the "them from ylem" approach, where fundamental particles are formed from a hypothetical primordial substance called ylem, which could be superluminal energy quanta. George Gamow (who helped develop the big bang theory) said "ylem" is an old Hebrew word meaning "material from which elements were formed". He said it also means something like "space between heaven and earth". See https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/4325 . Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ylem . In many ancient cultures ylem was called the "cosmic egg" or the "world egg". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_egg . Concerning your question about how the SEQ/TEQ model is related to quantum probabilities, please see my articles "Electrons Are Spin-½ Charged Half-Photons Generating the de Broglie Wavelength" (section 11) and "The Charged-Photon Model of the Electron Fits the Schrödinger Equation" on my academia webpage at https://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research . In these articles I show how the de Broglie wavelength and the Schrödinger equation can be related to the spin-1/2 charged half-photon model of the electron.”

Discussion session link: https://www.academia.edu/s/9d7d43ff35/a-superluminal-energy-quantum-model-of-the-cosmic-quantum?source=link


On Jul 18, 2019, at 4:32 PM, Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com<mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello all,

 I found a very interesting article "Can faster-than-light particles explain dark matter, dark energy and the Big Bang?" at https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/can-faster-than-light-tachyons-explain-dark-matter-dark-energy-and-the-big-bang. The physics article being discussed in this general article is "The birth and death of a universe" by H. M. Fried and Y. Gabellini in The European Physical Journal C at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140%2Fepjc%2Fs10052-016-4577-8 . They propose the existence of "electrically charged, fermionic pairs of tachyons (T) and anti-tachyons (𝑇¯)" . These sound a lot like (with significant differences) the charged superluminal energy quanta composing my double-helix photon model and quantum-vortex electron/positron models at richardgauthier.academia.edu/research<http://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research> .

with best wishes,
      Richard

On Jul 4, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com<mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello Albrecht (and all),

   Thank you for reminding me of the pleasant and productive conference we participated in at Liege last August.

    I remember your comment but was not clear on how it could be implemented in my double-helix photon model.  The double-helix photon model is not a zitterbewegung model. The zitterbewegung term refers to the internal frequency F=2mc^2/h of the Dirac electron, and related spatial models of the electron (or other particles). My relativistic quantum-vortex zitterbewegung model of the electron (see Part 2: Crossing lightspeed at richardgauthier.academia.edu/research<http://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research>)  is shown below first for a resting electron model (on the left) and then for a very highly relativistic electron model on the right). (The electron/positron model shrinks in size as 1/gamma with increasingly gamma of the electron/positron, as can be seen from the parametric equations below). In both resting and highly relativistic cases the superluminal energy quantum (SEQ) moves along a mathematical surface — a horn torus for the resting electron or positron model. As gamma increases, this mathematical surface transforms into a sphere for a highly relativistic (large gamma) electron or positron model. Interestingly, in both cases the minimum speed of the SEQ  composing the resting model and the highly relativistic model is calculated to be c, while the SEQ's maximum speed is calculated in both cases to be c sqrt(5) = 2.236 c. Coincidence? In between these extremes, the SEC is fully superluminal for two states (electric charge and spin combinations) and goes subliminal and back to superluminal during each SEQ cycle for the other two electric charge and spin combinations. I wonder if you could reduce both of these internally superluminal (and sometimes subluminal) quantum-vortex electron/positron models to having an internal movement purely at speed c.

   with best wishes,

       Richard


The parametric equations for the superluminal energy quantum composing the relativistic quantum-vortex positron/electron model are given by
<Screen Shot 2019-07-04 at 2.34.32 PM.png>
Below: the resting electron model (left) and the highly relativist electron model (right). The green surfaces are mathematical surfaces along which the superluminal energy quantum (small ball with its trajectory) moves.
T<Screen Shot 2019-07-04 at 1.53.08 PM.png><Screen Shot 2019-07-04 at 1.55.15 PM.png>

On Jul 4, 2019, at 4:03 AM, Albrecht Giese <phys at a-giese.de<mailto:phys at a-giese.de>> wrote:


Hi Richard,

you have again presented here your photon model, which has internally a superluminal motion (zitterbewegung). Why superluminal? That makes it difficult for physicists to accept your model. And as I have tried to explain to you in Liége: it is not necessary. You can have speed of light for the whole photon and also inside the photon. By taking into account special relativity, this works.

Best wishes
Albrecht


Am 02.07.2019 um 08:10 schrieb Richard Gauthier:
Hi Dan, John W, Martin and all,

   I just published my updated article  "Quantum-entangled superluminal double-helix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantum-vortex zitterbewegung electron and positron, Part 2: Crossing Lightspeed”, dated 2 July. It’s at

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Gauthier2/publications

and

http://richardgauthier.academia.edu/research .

The just-published first part of the article  "Quantum-entangled superluminal double-helix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantum-vortex zitterbewegung electron and positron” presented in Liege at the Vigier conference last August is there also.

with best wishes,
     Richard

On Jun 29, 2019, at 7:00 AM, Richard Gauthier <richgauthier at gmail.com<mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Dan,
   Thanks for your note about this discovery of a new property of light, “self-torque"
<Screen Shot 2019-06-29 at 6.47.22 AM.png>


which is reminiscent of the superluminal double-helix model of the photon, though with clearly significant differences.

<PastedGraphic-24.png>

all the best,
       Richard

On Jun 29, 2019, at 2:56 AM, DataPacRat <datapacrat at gmail.com<mailto:datapacrat at gmail.com>> wrote:

An article I believe is of interest to the members of this list:

https://phys.org/news/2019-06-property.html

New property of light discovered
by Bob Yirka, Science X Network, Phys.org<http://phys.org/>

A team of researchers affiliated with several institutions in Spain and the U.S. has
announced that they have discovered a new property of light—self-torque. In their paper
published in the journal Science, the group describes how they happened to spot the new
property and possible uses for it.

Scientists have long known about such properties of light as wavelength. More recently,
researchers have found that light can also be twisted, a property called angular
momentum. Beams with highly structured angular momentum are said to have orbital
angular momentum (OAM), and are called vortex beams. They appear as a helix
surrounding a common center, and when they strike a flat surface, they appear as
doughnut-shaped. In this new effort, the researchers were working with OAM beams
when they found the light behaving in a way that had never been seen before.

The experiments involved firing two lasers at a cloud of argon gas—doing so forced the
beams to overlap, and they joined and were emitted as a single beam from the other side
of the argon cloud. The result was a type of vortex beam. The researchers then
wondered what would happen if the lasers had different orbital angular momentum and if
they were slightly out of sync. This resulted in a beam that looked like a corkscrew with a
gradually changing twist. And when the beam struck a flat surface, it looked like a
crescent moon. The researchers noted that looked at another way, a single photon at the
front of the beam was orbiting around its center more slowly than a photon at the back of
the beam. The researchers promptly dubbed the new property self-torque—and not only
is it a newly discovered property of light, it is also one that has never even been
predicted.

The researchers suggest that it should be possible to use their technique to modulate the
orbital angular momentum of light in ways very similar to modulating frequencies in
communications equipment. This could lead to the development of novel devices that
make use of manipulating extremely tiny materials.

The actual published article is at
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1901/1901.10942.pdf . Discovered
via the blog article at
https://science.slashdot.org/story/19/06/29/0039231/new-property-of-light-discovered
, where one comment links to
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056086
, which includes the conclusion "In conclusion, twisted waves cannot
carry information that is independent from the information contained
in plane wave modes at the same frequency."


Thank you for your time,
--
Dan Boese, aka DataPacRat
"Does aₘᵢₙ=2c²/Θ ? I don't know, but wouldn't it be fascinating if it were?"
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com<mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"<http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>





_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at phys at a-giese.de<mailto:phys at a-giese.de>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"<http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>


[https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>      Virenfrei. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at richgauthier at gmail.com<mailto:richgauthier at gmail.com>
<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/pipermail/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/attachments/20190916/4f49e4b5/attachment.html>

More information about the General mailing list