<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Dear David and Martin,<br><br></div>This exchange has just challenged me to re-examine some of my thinking.<br><br></div>Based on the paper that I will write for the conference (and another one* that I just submitted to arXiv and will submit to a journal), I will be proposing that mass and charge are expressions of the same thing (not just both having energy). However, in a photon, the net charge is zero, but it has alternating fields (concentrated locally over an extended photon length). If the 'charge' reflected in the waves is alternating, does not the mass also alternate? But, if it alternates + and - (to give a net-zero mass), how can the photon have inertia and momentum? How can it be measured when captured in Martin's box? I now have to assume that the mass must be related to the square (or absolute value) of the charge. Is this not close to what John M. has proposed? Actually, the energy is proportional to the square of the fields, so this would be a natural conclusion that might be independent of John M.s model. But it does address, at least partially, the nature of mass of a photon.<br><br></div><div>Since I have shown in the papers that relativistic mass is EM field energy, there are other implications as well.<br></div><div><br></div>Andrew<br><br></div>* I think that I posted an earlier draft of this. But, here is the latest version.<br><div>___________________________________________<br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Mark, Martin van der <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:martin.van.der.mark@philips.com" target="_blank">martin.van.der.mark@philips.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Dear David,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Light has mass, it is always the same: m=E/c^2 = hbar*omega or m=p/c=hbar*k. If it hits you, you will notice its momentum, hence its mass. Only if you put it
in a box you will really be able to experience the mass as gravitational, see “light is heavy” for a proper explanation of the relativistic facts and confusions. The reason is that with the box around it cannot fly away so that you will not be able to interact
with it to actually notice the mass.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">The experiments you mention do just that: making a box.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Regards, Martin<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy" lang="DE">Dr. Martin B. van der Mark</span><span style="color:navy" lang="DE"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">Principal Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">Philips Research Europe - Eindhoven</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">High Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">Prof. Holstlaan 4</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">5656 AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:navy"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:navy">Tel: +31 40 2747548</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> General [mailto:<a href="mailto:general-bounces%2Bmartin.van.der.mark" target="_blank">general-bounces+martin.van.der.mark</a>=<a href="mailto:philips.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">philips.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>David Mathes<br>
<font size="2"><b>Sent:</b> dinsdag 26 mei 2015 6:29<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Force Equations</font></span></p><font size="1">
</font></div><font size="1">
</font></div><font size="1">
</font><p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2"> </font></p><font size="2">
</font><div><font size="2">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">John M., Andrew et al</span></font></p>
</div><font size="2">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="2">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">If the gravitational component stops oscillating, then the non-oscillating component might provide insight into a stopped or frozen photon.</span></font></p>
</div><font size="2">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="2">
</font><div><font size="2">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="2"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Does the Poynting vector disappear if there is no oscillation? That is, is the Poynting vector frequency dependent? </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">To examine this point, perhaps we need to move up to four-vector or full tensor at least for the theory</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">So far, photon-defined electron theories assume zero for the rest mass for the photon. If the photon has mass, one would expect charge. If there is
mass with no charge, we have some explaining to do. And better measurement of mass is required. So, if we could stop the photon and measure the mass - no matter how small but greater than zero - should we expect charge?</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">The current batch of electron theories suggest that photons are confined, contained, and charged to form an electron. So a linear path photon undergoes
a transformation to a curved path charged photon that behaves like the electron. However, the photon is massless and the electron has a clearly defined mass. Perhaps we cannot measure the photon mass because it's so small. After all, if there is any mass to
the photon, then it might be possible to lower the mass even further and create the massless particle. </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">If we could stop a photon and then restart the photon, one would expect the photon to continue on it's original vector. </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> There are at least two papers where photons have been stopped or frozen. In the following experiment, light was stopped for about one minute. This
store-and-forward photon may be the basis of future quantum computing and communications systems. Then a few years later, a photon was "frozen" with an opaque crystal. To me, this trapping sounds like a squeezed state or a Glauber state.</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><h3 style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%;margin-top:0.2rem;margin-bottom:1rem">
<font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:rgb(51,51,51);font-weight:normal">Stopped Light and Image Storage by Electromagnetically Induced Transparency up to the Regime of One Minute</span></font></h3><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><a href="http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.033601" target="_blank">http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.033601</a></span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/engineering/news/archive/?id=13459" target="_blank">http://www.princeton.edu/engineering/news/archive/?id=13459</a></span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><h3 style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%;margin-top:0.2rem;margin-bottom:1rem">
<font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:rgb(51,51,51);font-weight:normal">Sept 8, 2014 Observation of a Dissipation-Induced Classical to Quantum Transition</span></font></h3><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><a href="http://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031043" target="_blank">http://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.031043</a></span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><a href="http://www.princeton.edu/engineering/news/archive/?id=13459" target="_blank">http://www.princeton.edu/engineering/news/archive/?id=13459</a></span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">The mechanisms for stopping or freezing light aren't fully understood which may include CPT violation or other anomalies. One possibility is the photon
is in a squeezed state or a Glauber coherence state. If chirality suffers, the we have a parity violation resulting in CP or PT violations since CPT violations come in pairs. If charge is created by this stopped photon, is mass created? Then we have CP and
CT as options. </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Photons are normally considered to be non-stop particles. However, in these two cases they appear more as direct flight particles with zero mass that
when released continue on.</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Does a trapped photon have any rest mass? </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">How would a photon with a rest mass affect the photon-electron relationship?</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Best</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">David</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
<br>
</span></font></p><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%" align="center">
<font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">
<hr align="center" size="1" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">From:</span></b><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> Andrew Meulenberg <<a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com" target="_blank">mules333@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 25, 2015 8:07 PM<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Force Equations</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><div><div><div class="h5"><font size="1">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span></font></p><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Dear John M.,<br>
<br>
You may be saving me a lot of work. I was planning on working on super-gravity this year and was basing it on energy-density-induced non-linearities. You may have solved the problem, or at least laid the ground work, before I ever get to it. Your statement
"... gravitational waves require spacetime to have the specified <u>energy density</u>... ," is definitely pushing in the right direction. General Relativity is concerned about mass. At the basic level, it is mass/energy density that controls the interactions.
This goes to the nuclear levels, i.e., below the region of validity for QM as we know it.<br>
<br>
Your study of the various ratios, and the identification of relationships leads to a whole field of information that is to easy to overlook without your signposts.<br>
<br>
Good luck,<br>
<br>
Andrew</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div><font size="1">
</font><div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">_________________________________________________________
</span></font></p>
</div><font size="1">
</font><blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"><font size="1">
</font><div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">However, I have also had two other major successes which I will briefly mention here. In the future I will dedicate a separate email
to each of these other subjects. First, my son Jim, has generated computer simulations which show various characteristics of my particle model. Since my model quantifies frequency, amplitude and impedance, my models actually represent calculated effects.
I might be able to send some computer simulations tomorrow. </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Another success is that I can now show that my model of fundamental particles gives new insights into the electric field and the gravitational
field generated by an electron or other fundamental particle. I previously concluded that an electron’s electric field contains both a non-oscillating strain of spacetime that produces most of the effects we associate with the electric field. However, there
is also an oscillating distortion of spacetime at the electron’s Compton frequency. We know the energy density of an electron’s electric field, the frequency and the impedance of spacetime, so we can calculate the amplitude of the wave required to produce
the known energy density of the electron’s electric field. This amplitude exactly corresponds to the expected magnitude and distribution expected from my particle model.
</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">The new gravitational insight is: I can now prove that gravity also has both a non-oscillating component that produces curved spacetime
and an oscillating component that implies that a gravitational field also has energy density. When you compare the energy density of a gravitational field to the “interactive energy density of spacetime”, it is possible to see how the combination produces
the curved spacetime.</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">The document attached above is a few pages out of the revised version of my book. These pages contain some recently added information
and some older information which was partly covered in a previous attachment. However, I decided to include some of that older information also since it sets the stage for the new information. I had to start somewhere, so the attachment starts in the middle
of the book. Even though there is a vast amount of missing information, I think that you will be able to get the key points from the attachment. </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">My approach based on spacetime allows much more detailed analysis than the rest of the group because I start with specific properties
of spacetime which can be quantified. I have dipole waves in spacetime which have specific frequencies, produce specific displacements of space and time and have dimensionless strain amplitudes which can be quantified. Combining this with the impedance of
spacetime and some equations that I have developed, it is possible to calculate particle size, energy, energy density, forces, etc. Most important, the approach predicts that the particles (called “rotars) can generate three forces which correspond to the
strong force, the electromagnetic force and gravity. In a previous post I gave some equations which showed previously unknown relationship between the gravitational force and the electrostatic force that were derived from my model. Now I have generated more
equations which specify the relationship between the electrostatic force and the gravitational force produced by fundamental particles such as an electron.
</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">The attached document is 5 pages. The last 2 pages are totally new, but even the first 3 pages can be seen in a new light. You will
see that the relationship between the electrostatic force from charge<i> e</i> (designated
<i>F</i><sub>e</sub>) and the gravitational force (designated <i>F</i><sub>g</sub>) is independent of the model which made these predictions. However, the equations on the last two pages fit so well with my model, that they become a proof for the model.</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"> </span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">John M.</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div><font size="1">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><font size="1"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"></span></font><br>
</p></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><hr><br></div>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>