<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span>John</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30420">Well, that pretty much sums it up for now. 2015 is here and deadlines loom</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span>One more thing.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30470">A photon traversing free space would encounter all sorts of little charges from real particles (leptons and ions) to undetected quarks. These encounters would effect both the path, s ,and transversely as well. </span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30665">It seems to me that within the electron, there are no other charges permitted. No superposition of charge particles that is. However, charged fields *might* be permitted to traverse the electron.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30666">This suggests that in most, if not all of the photon as an electron models would have internally a lowered permittivity and permeability by the absence of charged matter. Therefore, the charged photon would be permitted to operate at c within electron volume, but in reality the actual number for c internally exceeds the actual c we know and love a bit too much.</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span>Inside the electron is a slightly negative vacuum! (?)</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span>Best</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419" dir="ltr"><span>David</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30419"><br></div><br> <blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30474"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30473"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30472"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30471"> <hr size="1" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30480"> <font size="2" face="Arial" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30475"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> John Williamson <John.Williamson@glasgow.ac.uk><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> David Mathes <davidmathes8@yahoo.com>; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> Nick Bailey <nick@bailey-family.org.uk>; Anthony Booth <abooth@ieee.org>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr>; Manohar . <manohar_berlin@hotmail.com> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:06 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> RE: [General] Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30765"><br><div id="yiv6326763937">
<style type="text/css"></style>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30767">
<div style="direction:ltr;font-family:Tahoma;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30766">My turn for green ...<br>
<div style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#000000;font-size:16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30768">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div style="direction:ltr;" id="yiv6326763937divRpF817349"><font face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30769"><b>From:</b> David Mathes [davidmathes8@yahoo.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 17, 2015 4:52 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> John Williamson; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Nick Bailey; Anthony Booth; Ariane Mandray; Manohar .<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30771">
<div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1434559030593_30770">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr">John W.</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr">Good to hear from you again so soon...<span style="font-size:13px;">I'm in the red....</span></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107"><span><br>
</span></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr"><span><br>
</span></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107" dir="ltr"><span>David</span></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13107"><span><br>
</span></div>
<br>
<blockquote id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13069" style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16,16,255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13068">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13067">
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13066" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<hr id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13106" size="1">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13065" face="Arial" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> John Williamson <John.Williamson@glasgow.ac.uk><br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> David Mathes <davidmathes8@yahoo.com>; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</span></b> Nick Bailey <nick@bailey-family.org.uk>; Anthony Booth <abooth@ieee.org>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr>; Manohar . <manohar_berlin@hotmail.com>
<br>
<b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13264"><span id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13263" style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, June 16, 2015 6:08 PM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> RE: [General] Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
</font></div>
<div class="yiv6326763937y_msg_container" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13155"><br>
<div id="yiv6326763937"><style type="text/css">
<!--
#yiv6326763937 p
{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}
-->
#yiv6326763937 BODY {direction:ltr;font-family:Tahoma;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;}#yiv6326763937 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv6326763937 BODY {}#yiv6326763937 BODY {}#yiv6326763937 BODY {}#yiv6326763937 BODY {}#yiv6326763937 BODY {}</style>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13154">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13153" style="direction:ltr;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">Hello David,</font><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2">I know you sent this to Viv, but I'll have a go ...</font><br clear="none">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13152">
<hr tabindex="-1" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<div id="yiv6326763937divRpF928156" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);direction:ltr;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13151" face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><b>From:</b> General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of David Mathes [davidmathes8@yahoo.com]<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 17, 2015 1:39 AM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
</font><br clear="none">
</div>
<div style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);"></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13157">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13156" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">
<div id="yiv6326763937">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_2745">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_2744" style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91722" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span>Vivian</span></div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92101" size="2">Many of the electron models involve two photon loops. The rotating photon model you propose is certainly sobering, well reasoned and thought out relying mostly on nature and experiment. </font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92326" size="2">I use to think that physicists understood only 5% of the universe. After reading your website, I am encouraged to see that can be reduced to approaching zero. This view certainly provide lots
of room for improvement on many parts.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font color="003366">Too true!</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92341" size="2">What is a photon is the conference question. "What is a photon" didn't strike me as good english or even american-speak. Like many others, I have been wondering what is inside the electron and
conjecturing it's some sort of photon with a strong bias towards nature and experiment as the final referee.
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font color="003366">Only referee.</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_2995" size="2">Like a little child, civilization has graduated from understanding the four elements to the Periodic Table to the 61 or so Elementary Particles. For me, I graduated from taking apart clocks to
seeing what made them tick, and cakes to understand not just the end result but the framework of layers and toppings, the transformation from field to fork according to a recipe, and molecules. </font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3667" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;" size="2">What I really wanted to know was what's inside the </font><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3239" size="2">molecules,
then the modern atoms, where Feynman noted, there is room at the bottom. Nanotechnology is where the herds are discovering all sorts of wonderful materials and properties.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Y<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13266" color="003366">ep. me nano-sheep. trying to grow down and become pico-sheep or even femto-sheep.</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><font color="003366"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13301" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13300" color="#9d1811"><b>With the photon we are even lower that femto...but not at the bottom.<br>
<font color="008000"><br>
True, and with the Z, for example - but physics will stop you before you get there. I think we should write a book about atto the sheep though!</font><br>
</b></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3417" size="2">And here is this group focused on what is inside elementary particles, in particular, the electron. The electron is a key enigma and considered the unit of basic charge, that is until quarks came
along or rather were invented to balance the equations since nature for some reason (TBD) does not permit us to view quarks with our current technology. In our quest to decode nature's puzzles and enigmas, We think topology and geometry play a role.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13265" color="003366">Quarks are not complete electromagnetic loops. They simply do not exist except as a mathematical symmetry. I am fairly sure about this as I used to hit them very hard, experimentally, and they never
came out. Martin will talk about their lack of physical existence in August.<br clear="none">
</font></font></div>
<font color="#000000" size="2"></font>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13478" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13489" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13495">Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Try, try again. And this time either get a bigger hammer
(LHC, ILC, Plasma Wakefield accelerator, etc.). <br>
<font color="008000"><br>
<font color="008000">True statement, but n</font>o in principle - we know the total mass-energy of the stable particles - and that they are somehow bound. Binding energy is negative energy. Also we know (roughly) bounds on the parton masses - and the percentage
of the 4-momentum they carry<font color="008000">, </font>from deep inelastic lepton scattering for example, b<font color="008000">e</font>cause you can hit them. They cannot be supermassive. This leaves no room at the bottom for the poor little things to
exist independently at all. Try pressing a particle physicist with this and y<font color="008000">o<font color="008000">u</font></font> will find they go all a splutter.</font><br>
</b></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"><font color="#9d1811"><b><br>
</b></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13595" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13594" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13593">For those so inclined, topological modeling of the quarks and gluons may provide some insight on whether
another tool or another method such as conditioning the energetic particles beyond U(1) to SU(2) and SU(3) levels may result in lower energy requirements and higher results.<br>
<br>
<font color="008000">SU(3), for example, is related to rotations. <font color="008000">
Extended r</font>otations are a better paradigm - in my view - than simply postulating little hard bits with that symettry. Why? when proper double-covering rotations will do a better job? Geometry rules for me over little colored balls in a bag.</font><br>
</b></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"><font color="#9d1811"><b><br>
</b></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"><font color="#9d1811"><b>Then there are the charged boson, +- W and the neutral Z particle. </b></font></font><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14022" style="font-size:13px;color:rgb(157,24,17);">That should be enough for the standard model folks.
Extending to SUSY (E8 et al) should follow. </b><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14023" style="font-size:13px;color:rgb(157,24,17);">For extra credit, try extending any parametric model to all the electron and photon models presented here.<br>
<br>
<font color="008000">E8 is a spastic hamburger solution. It is octonions crossed with octonions ( octonions are the biggest division algebra). It is pushed by mathematicians who think it is clever to be as general as possible - while keeping cherished concepts
from real numbers alive. All this would be fine if it were not for the fact that it predicts SOOO much that is NOT observed. Experimental non-observation of predicted phenomena b<font color="008000">y</font> the old-fashioned experimental method should mean
: bin it!</font><br>
</b></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3666" size="2">So that brings me to two questions.</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3592" size="2">1. What is the process of symmetrization for the electron?
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13305" color="003366">Energy minimisation. Strongest force satisfied first. Maximal internal mass and field cancellation. Result: spherical symmetry.</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><font color="003366"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13891" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13890" color="#9d1811">Apparent spherical symmetry externally while internally, there is a circulating toroidal massless photon or quanta.
<br>
<font color="008000"><br>
Exactly. In momentum space.</font><br>
</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"><font color="#9d1811"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13894" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13893" color="#9d1811"><font size="2">For a </font>parallel<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13892" size="2"> to
spin frame of reference "at particle rest", the torus is an approximation of a sphere. If the torus is rotating and or precessing, any experiment will produce apparent spherical results with some anomalies which are usually attributed to other factors beyond
topology.<br>
<br>
<font color="008000">Yes</font><br>
</font></font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
This leads to understand photons...</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
2. <span class="yiv6326763937" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_3597" style="font-size:small;">What is inside the photon?<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Stuff. Stuff that can transform through proper spatial and temporal translations to other stuff. You may like to call it energy, but energy is just the scalar part, so we need another word for the bits that are current, field and angular momentum. Anyone think
of a better word than stuff?<br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4334" size="2">I realizing everyone likes a photon cause it's mainstream, and the conference is about photons et al. However, the real struggle is the internals of the photon, no matter how improbable the models
may seem, they suggest that the photon we know may actually be a quanta, spacetime or something else. One way out is to use multiple dimensions. Another way out is to renormalize. Another is to simply declare the photon is the bottom.
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13973" color="003366">Too simple. Not so. Williamson1997 argued this. Williamson2015 thinks Williamson1997 was a bit simple.</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><font color="003366"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13975" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13974" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13983">I'm on the road to 2015.
</b></font></font><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13975" size="2"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13974" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_13983"><br>
<font color="008000">2015 cannot came soon enough for me!</font><br>
</b></font></font>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4336" size="2">I would hope the photon can be taken apart and like the clock, found to have some fascinating set of gears and mechanisms, and perhaps an occasionally chime or nasty ringing noise. Perhaps addressing
the other massless boson might provide clues to the nature of what is inside the photon. To wit, what is inside the gluon(s)?<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
N<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14044" color="003366">o gluons. We know this because QCD is non-abelian and hence one should observe "glueballs". There are papers with my name on ot called things like "search for glueballs in ..." Experimentally, theyu
are just not there. This should kill QCD if one applies the scientific method, which is why the scientific methos has fallen so very out of fashion in HEP. This has to stop!<br clear="none">
</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14080" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14086">I like to keep my options open. Perhaps this path needs to be paved with mathematical physics first. Then the experimentalists can try again.<br>
<font color="008000"><br>
I can see my typ<font color="008000">o</font> rate went through the roo<font color="008000">f</font> .. and I forgot to "blue" some of my stuff! Math<font color="008000">ematical physics is a fine thing - but it has to be subject to experiment and t<font color="008000">he
</font>current fashion is to let things stand<font color="008000"> -e<font color="008000">ven if in conflict with experiment. In fact, for some, it seems almost a badge of honour these days.
</font></font></font></font></b></font></div>
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14080" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14086"><font color="008000"><font color="008000"><font color="008000"><font color="008000"><br>
</font></font></font></font></b></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4803" size="2">So this leads me to the next question</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4371" size="2">3. What makes the photon tick?<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14043" color="003366"><br clear="none">
Space and time. Just look at the equations. What do you see? d space and d time.</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14174" color="#9d1811"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14180">Inadequate.
<br>
<br>
<font color="008000">Hihi. Do not agree. d time is a tick (frequency) d space a transformation. John D is right: things only wave in space, in time they tick (and vibrate - with an inverse transformation).
<br>
<br>
I know what you mean though. My answer above was a bit facetious. There must exist something - call it stuff. That stuff may exist (at least) in scalar form (mass) vector form (current) bi-vector form (EM field), tri-vector form (angular momentum density) and
a confinining form (quadri<font color="008000">-</font>vector). It is an interesting discussion as to whether this is enough or one needs more. I'm looking forwards to it!</font><br>
</b></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<font size="2"><br>
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span class="yiv6326763937" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4523" style="font-size:small;">As we stretch and strain photons looping them a few times to obtain an oscillating and resonant model, we simple do not know what is inside the photon.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font color="003366">Speak for yourself!</font><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<span class="yiv6326763937" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14202" style="font-size:small;"><b id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14225"><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14232" color="#9d1811">LOL. I am.</font></b></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br>
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span class="yiv6326763937" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434499518072_4733" style="font-size:small;"> 4. Is there more "room at the bottom" below elementary particles?
</span><font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14206" size="2"><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14205" color="003366">Yes!</font><br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
Ah, the quanta level of massless particles comprised of fields and more closely interacting with vacuum and spacetime.</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
Where is the bottom?<br clear="none">
<font color="003366"><br clear="none">
Look below you!</font><br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
Best</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
David<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434508064050_14234" color="003366">Cheers, John W.</font>
<div class="yiv6326763937qtdSeparateBR"><br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd87316"><br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd02106" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724"><span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724"><span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724"><span class="yiv6326763937" style="font-size:small;"><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"> </font></div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91724" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<font size="2"><span class="yiv6326763937"><br clear="none">
</span></font></div>
<br clear="none">
<blockquote id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91728" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-left-width:2px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(16,16,255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91727" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91726" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div class="yiv6326763937qtdSeparateBR"><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt5059226143" id="yiv6326763937yqt80677">
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91725">
<hr id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91884" size="1">
<font id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91729" face="Arial" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Vivian Robinson <viv@etpsemra.com.au><br clear="none">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<br clear="none">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:35 PM<br clear="none">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> [General] Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div class="yiv6326763937y_msg_container" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91861">
<br clear="none">
<div id="yiv6326763937">
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91860">Dear All,
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91883"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_91859">It has been a while since my last communication, primarily because of other activities. One of those is quite relevant to this discussion topic. Over the past two + decades I have been trying to understand
the photon and its role in shaping the universe, from its smallest sub atomic particles to its observed large scale structure. To this end I have finally compiled a 400+ A5 pages summary of this study. You can see some information and extracts from it at my
website <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://www.universephysics.com/">
www.universephysics.com</a>. Its relevance to this discussion is that it strongly suggests that all particles, from the lightest neutrinos through the electron, proton and neutron to the heaviest cosmic rays and accelerator generated particles are all composed
of what I call rotating photons, i.e. photons of the appropriate energy making two revolutions within their wavelength. There is no other form of matter. For example, quarks with fractional charge and gluons have never been separately isolated and identified.
Of course the theoreticians overcome that by developing a theory that gluons bind quarks together in such a way that the greater the quark separation the stronger the binding force. In the real world, the best reason for experimentalists not finding something
is because it doesn't exist. This study is in three space dimensions and time. This study is a Big Bang, dark energy, dark matter, black hole, cosmological constant, quark, gluon, string and brane free zone. </div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92066"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92020">In the course of this work I have simplified the mathematics and used them to show how the rotating photon model matches dozens of measured properties of matter. Equally important I have made dozens of
experimentally testable predictions of properties of sub atomic particles, yielding properties that are unknown or known but not recognised as such. Included among these is the reduction in the diameter of the electron (and other particles) with increasing
velocity. I regard experiment as the only arbiter of the correctness or otherwise of a theory and have given plenty of opportunity for it to be tested experimentally.</div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92032">The same applies for dark energy and dark matter. Under this model, the universe is infinite and static. The so-called anomalous type 1a supernova (SNe1a) intensities are predictable in a steady state
universe. There is no need for dark energy to explain it. The "rapid" rotation of galaxies, thought to be due to dark matter, does not need gravity to explain it. Both of those features are supported by the necessary mathematics and experimental observations.
The so-called "pillars" of the Big Bang theory:-</div>
<div>The redshift of photons from distant galaxies</div>
<div>Olber's paradox and the dark night sky</div>
<div>An infinite static universe will collapse under its own gravitational attraction</div>
<div>The greater prevalence of quasars at higher redshift</div>
<div>The hydrogen to helium ratio</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92047">all have very good explanations under this infinite steady state model. </div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92048"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92049">Even before I completed this work, it was apparent to some people that the difference between cosmologists theory for the observed universe and the observed universe was 24 times the mass/energy of the
observed universe plus 10^60 other universes in the multiverse, plus several additional undetected space dimensions. Setting aside the 10^60 other universes, which are matched by this infinite static universe model, that still leaves a difference between theory
and observation of 24 times the mass/energy of the observed universe. Until such time as dark energy and dark matter are confirmed, that is an error between theory and observation. As I indicate in my summary, that must be the largest error between theory
and observation in the recorded history of human endeavour (mathematical division by zero excluded). If anyone knows of a larger error, I would be happy to read about it. Many members of the general public, and some dissenting physicists and other scientists
are not happy with such a significant difference being portrayed as the best answer developed by those who call themselves the best scientific minds. Recently the New York Times published an article titled <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434076349702_19972" target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/opinion/a-crisis-at-the-edge-of-physics.html?_r=1" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:12px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">A
Crisis at the Edge of Physics</a>, in which it quoted an article published in Nature in which the authors were critical of some scientists claiming elegant theories did not need to be tested experimentally. Such an article in NY Times is an indication there
is public interest in these topics. Many members of the general public are not happy that the difference between theory and experiment is 24 times the mass energy of the observed universe. I use this as an example that there is considerable dissent in the
scientific community and among the general public against those standard model ideas and there is a need for suitable alternative explanations.</div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div>If you go to that website an look at the back cover of this paperback, the last sentence reads: "Using little more than good high school mathematics, some readers will be able to understand topics that baffled Einstein and calculate properties properties
of nuclei that baffle nuclear physicists." IMHO this is no idle boast. Using Einstein's principle of mass distorting space-time causing gravity, it shows why an infinite static universe will not collapse under the gravitational attraction without needing a
cosmological constant. As for nuclear physics I give rules for determining the structure of any isotope of any nucleus, giving its arrangement of protons and neutrons, its spin, approximate magnetic moment, the skin effect, and with a little more work, its
dimensions from its binding energy (or its binding energy from its dimensions, as well as the probability of it being a stable or long life isotope versus a short life radioactive nucleus, as well as some other properties. </div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92016">The reason for this email is to suggest that the topic under discussion at the upcoming SPIE conference has somewhat greater implications than you may be aware. It is my suggestion that understanding the
photon and the way it makes two revolutions per wavelength to form particles aren't just important. They are everything in physics, calculating Newton's universal gravitational constant G excluded (which I haven't done). I am currently travelling and not able
to give more information. I will be meeting with John W in Glasgow in a couple of weeks and will pass further information across to him then. If I am unable to make it to the SPIE conference, which looks increasingly likely, John W may be able to convey more
information to you after our meeting. In the meantime I make no apology for agreeing with most of the aspects about the photon forwarded by John W and Martin vdM and remain skeptical about contrary ideas forwarded by others. I am now moving out of telecommunications
range for a few days.</div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div>Vivian Robinson. </div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92006"> </div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
<div><br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br clear="none">
_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" id="yiv6326763937yui_3_16_0_1_1434474634589_92005" ymailto="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com">
davidmathes8@yahoo.com</a><br clear="none">
<a href="<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br clear="none">
Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none">
</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd87250" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd48636" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd05394" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd05293" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd92803" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd64333" style="font-family:Tahoma;font-size:10pt;color:rgb(0,0,0);">
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv6326763937yqt6571687878" id="yiv6326763937yqtfd78622" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div></body></html>