<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ks_c_5601-1987">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Gulim;
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@Gulim";
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:KO;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Thank you, John Macken, for underscoring this vital point!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Let me elaborate the issue even further:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">The purpose of physics is to make models to understand the REAL PHYSICAL processes that are being used by nature to perpetuate the cosmic evolution.</span></i></b><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">
Meaning, if we perceive something as a wave; then something PHYSICAL (real material or real field) must waving. Similarly, if we model a particle as locally looped oscillation (of some kind); then something physical must be looping.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">If, what is waving or looping, is a physical field (rather than some ¡°substance¡± of old notion); then there are two possibilities. The physical field itself is moving spatially and temporally,
as the case may be. Or, the local value of the modeling parameters (under consideration) held by (or, constituent of) the parent field are changing (oscillating); but the physical field itself is stationary, serving as the universal Inertial Reference Frame.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>John Macken<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:04 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] Challenge<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Hello All,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Various graphic representations of electrons have been presented by members of the group. They have looked like knots, spirals, loops and even medieval torture devices.
However, not once has there been any description of the medium or the distortion that is being pictured. This is the equivalent of drawing a three dimensional graph except failing to designate what exactly is being graphed.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">When I show pictures of my electron model, I can tell you exactly what is being graphed. I have a spacetime field with impedance and a wave structure. My electron model
produces quantifiable distortions of this spacetime field. They have specific wave properties with known strain amplitude, known frequency and known size. While I cannot predict the energy of an electron from first principles, I can calculate the energy of
the model being pictured and show that it corresponds to the electron¡¯s energy. I do not hide behind the equation E =
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math","serif"">©€¥ø</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""> and say that no further calculation is required. I can derive E =
</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math","serif"">©€¥ø</span><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""> from my proposed structure of the spacetime field.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">Therefore, my challenge to the group is to identify what is being shown in the pictures. Are these waves? If so, give the details of the medium carrying the waves. String
theory has served as a bad example because they draw pictures of vibrating strings while claiming that the strings are a basic building block that is not made of anything more fundamental. If a photon or an electric field is your basic building block, are
you claiming that it is also unknowable? <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">For those that doubt the existence of the energetic spacetime field, I challenge you to identify the components being pictured in your electron models.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"">John M.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>