<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1886330431;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:794483476 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1895778123;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-1463789926 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Hi Chandra<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>First, I want to say that I really respect the work and analysis you have done regarding the phenomenon of light, the “CTF” and the makeup of particles. You and I have come to amazingly similar conclusions regarding space, time, relativity, and the quantum nature we observe.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>One item I am trying to fully comprehend, and solve, is the exact nature of our measurement, and the full definition of the causes for the experimentally observed “properties” of light which cause us to have the concept of a “photon”.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>When I envision the CTF it consists of “nodes” and lines of force between the nodes. This allows me to more completely envision the properties of space. How do you envision this field?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Another consideration I have been dealing with is the perceived spin of photons. While it is understandable that an object, with no spin angular momentum, when it encounters and object which is spinning, will show an angular momentum component in the reaction. And superimposed sinusoidal plane waves can also cause a form of rotation due to phase shift. But what I have been trying to fully understand is the clear definition of the nature of spin quantization in the reaction of light with matter.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>There are several additional considerations, and clues, which I want to more completely explore. The binding forces of particles (Poincare) for example, may be interpreted as being resonances of the CTF, or they may be interpreted as being properties of the reaction of energy with space (properties of fields). In practically all senses, these two interpretations are actually just a different way of expressing the same thing. But in either view, the presence of these forces means that the properties of space, or the properties of the fields which propagate to make light, obey certain rules, which go beyond Maxwell’s treatment of the phenomena.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>What this means (to me) is that a full and concise definition of how energy reacts with space, and therefore a full definition of the related properties of the CTF, which will produce the results we see in experiment, will have to deal with how and why spin and <i>confinement</i> occurs for fermions, and will also disclose exactly what is going on in the propagation of light.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>This may eventually lead us back to the same conclusions you have drawn regarding the nature of light, but it is possible that it could also add a bit more to the understanding of the nature of light and the properties of space. As an aside, in my view, the “stuff” of Martin’s paper is the reaction of energy with space.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Your work is quite inspiring and enlightening.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:33 AM<br><b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Chip: You ask good and relevant questions!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>To further throw a “curve ball” into the discussions and expose my personally biased views about the space as a Complex Tension Field (CTF), I want to iterate two points from my previous publications:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>1.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Energy of the universe:</span></i></b><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'> 100% of the energy is held by the CTF. No dark energy or dark matter are needed. There are no “matter” anyway! Only 4 to 5% of the tension field energy is manifest as radiation and particles. Rest is the background supporting energy (tension). Everything manifest is some kind of harmonic oscillation. The linear excitation generates EM wave that propagates perpetually away from the site of excitation due to the intrinsic property of any tension field. It derives from the fact that a tension field cannot assimilate the external perturbation energy; so it pushes it away perpetually to achieve its local state of equilibrium (the root origin of the conservation of energy). Self-looped oscillations (resonant for stability) are generated by non-linear excitations. Perpetual self-looped “propagation” “fools” the CTF, as if it is pushing away the external perturbation energy perpetually, just like the linear excitation (EM wave). <b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph><b><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></i></b></p><p class=MsoListParagraph><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>EM waves do not have spin or angular momentum. Interaction of multiple polarized E-vectors with (axially symmetric) <b><i>dipolar</i></b> detectors, generate various spin and angular momentum like responses in our detectors. Just like the field quantization, we are imposing spin and angular momentum on “photon” wave packets by detecting them with particles that have all sorts of quantized properties, including spin and angular momentum. Yes, we do “see” the world; unfortunately, only indirectly through detectors that are always “wearing quantum goggles”! And we are believing 100% on these “biased reporters” </span><span style='font-family:Wingdings'>J</span><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>!! That is why truly free imagination to visualize the ontological reality is so vital. The path is process visualization. Invisible natural interaction processes are ontological. Evidences (of “evidence based science”) are always “colored” by the sensors’ intrinsic biases; which can never be overcome; except through logically self-consistent iterative mapping of every possible interaction details (Interaction Process Mapping Epistemology, IPM-E). <b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2'><![if !supportLists]><b><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>2.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span></i></b><![endif]><b><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>CTF as the inertial (stationary) reference frame: </span></i></b><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>The “stuff’ of the universe is the <b><i>stationary tension field</i></b>. That is how nature accommodates the same laws of physics in every galaxies. Spectrometry proves it. All Doppler frequency shifts, - (a) <b><i>permanent</i></b> due to source velocity, and (b)<b><i> perceived</i></b> due to detector velocity, are distinctly different phenomena,; because CTF is stationary. CTF is only three dimensional! But it has a variety of built-in tensions whose “appropriate perturbations” is making the observable universe “tick”! The CTF is imperceptible to us directly because we , ourselves are emergent complex assembly of various localized self-looped oscillations. This is why the structure of the universe appear so elusive; but it certainly is neither an illusion, nor a Holographic Projection of a hologram in the hand of some Creator </span><span style='font-family:Wingdings'>J</span><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>! <b><i><o:p></o:p></i></b></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>My publications are available from:</span></a><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>1.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><a href="http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/"><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/</span></a><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>2.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><a href="http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=23817#.VafJHPnivHA"><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=23817#.VafJHPnivHA</span></a><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoListParagraph style='text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l1 level1 lfo4'><![if !supportLists]><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><span style='mso-list:Ignore'>3.<span style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> </span></span></span><![endif]><a href="http://bookzz.org/book/2344956/9dd03a"><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>http://bookzz.org/book/2344956/9dd03a</span></a><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.25in'><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Chip Akins<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, July 16, 2015 8:52 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Hi John M<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Thank you for the paper.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I have a few questions:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>You propose that the photon has quantized angular momentum, (as QM suggests), so you feel the photon is inherently quantized, and has a center of action which is located at its center of angular momentum?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>You are using acoustic equations, which implies to me, that you feel that light is a compression (longitudinal) wave instead of the Maxwellian transverse wave. Is this an accurate reflection of your view?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>By the way, I agree that Compton Scattering does not prove the photon is a particle. If we treat the electron in its entirety as a set of circulating fields, and use a photon model which seems realistic based on experiment.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>When I try to conceive your illustrated electron model as a set of standing waves, it kind of looks like an onion in a 3D view. With waves moving inward and waves moving outward. But you also say that it is a vortex, with angular momentum, which, in my mind, conjures up a notion of circulating fields instead of the standing wave model. Circulating fields, when viewed from any point external to the model, contain an advancing and a retreating wave component as well. But it seems the two models are not compatible. Thoughts?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Also, have you considered using a full set of wave equations, which go beyond the longitudinal acoustic formulation and accommodates both transverse and longitudinal waves?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Is there some compelling reason in your mind not to follow this avenue?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> General [<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Macken<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, July 16, 2015 2:21 AM<br><b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles<br><b>Subject:</b> [General] The New Aether<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Hello All,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Attached is a copy of the paper that I submitted for the SPIE conference except that it is in a 2 column format which I prefer for informal circulation. In particular, I would like to call your attention to section 2 of this paper starting on page 2 and finishing on page 4. Many parts of this paper were inspired by this group, but particularly this section 2. The message has come through loud and clear that no one else believes that spacetime can have the energy density that I propose. This section addresses that point. I also like the quote contained in the first paragraph. I think that it sets the stage for the rest of the paper. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>I will be traveling for a few days, so I might not be able to answer comments immediately.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>John M.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>