<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yiv2974005636"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_24025"><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_24024"><div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12969"><span>John</span></div><div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11685"><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11684">FWIW I'm looking at displacement current in a number of ways. Point, line, surface, volume, dimensional, squeezed states, BEC. </span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11953">The difficulty I have is that displacement currents could be nested, and in the case of particles, QM currents could also be present. </span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12177">If one used the nested model of a quanta within a photon within an electron within a hydrogen atom, and looks at the displacement currents, there seems to be levels of currents that may be coupling and decoupling. Add to switched coupling the velocity-dependant wake interference with a back reaction, and what began as energy density and changes in energy density as displacement currents now encounters emerging issues of harmonics and even frame dragging. </span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12446">And this is all for fixed c in an isotropic medium. If c can even remotely be made variable say a negative vacuum, thinks get a bit more complicated.</span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div class="yiv2974005636" dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span class="yiv2974005636" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12491">As a refresher, I could use a good peek at the 4th year course notes on displacement current. </span></div><div class="yiv2974005636" dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12498"><span class="yiv2974005636" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12500"><br clear="none" class="yiv2974005636" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_12502"></span></div><div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11683"><span>David</span></div><br clear="none"> <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yiv2974005636yqt6950767330" id="yiv2974005636yqt54076"><blockquote id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11690" style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;"> <div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11689" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"> <div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11688" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"> <div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11687"> <hr id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11863" size="1"> <font id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11691" size="2" face="Arial"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> John Williamson <John.Williamson@glasgow.ac.uk><br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> David Mathes <davidmathes8@yahoo.com>; Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; John Duffield <johnduffield@btconnect.com> <br clear="none"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</span></b> Joakim Pettersson <joakimbits@gmail.com>; Nick Bailey <nick@bailey-family.org.uk>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr>; Manohar . <manohar_berlin@hotmail.com> <br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, July 29, 2015 11:47 PM<br clear="none"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> RE: [General] The New Aether<br clear="none"> </font> </div> <div class="yiv2974005636y_msg_container" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11861"><br clear="none"><div id="yiv2974005636"><style type="text/css"></style><div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11955">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11954" style="direction:ltr;font-family:Tahoma;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;">Hello John D,<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I'm intrigued. Just which bit of the "displacement current" do you think I do not get?<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I have taught this, and the distinction between particle current and quantum mechanical current in 4th year courses so it would be good if I could take it to a deeper level.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
In particular, are there any terms missing from my first equation in the position statement attached? If so what?<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Regards, John W.<br clear="none">
<style>
#yiv2974005636 --
filtered {}
#yiv2974005636 filtered {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
#yiv2974005636 filtered {font-family:Cambria;panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
#yiv2974005636
p.yiv2974005636MsoNormal, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636MsoNormal, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;}
#yiv2974005636 .yiv2974005636MsoChpDefault
{font-family:Cambria;}
#yiv2974005636 filtered {margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636WordSection1
{}
#yiv2974005636 </style>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;"><br clear="none">
</span><span lang="EN-US"></span></div>
<br clear="none">
<div class="yiv2974005636qtdSeparateBR"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div><div class="yiv2974005636yqt6436413288" id="yiv2974005636yqt51968"><div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11959" style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#000000;font-size:16px;">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<div id="yiv2974005636divRpF633892" style="direction:ltr;"><font id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11958" face="Tahoma" color="#000000" size="2"><b>From:</b> General [general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] on behalf of David Mathes [davidmathes8@yahoo.com]<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 28, 2015 7:25 PM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> John Duffield; 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether<br clear="none">
</font><br clear="none">
</div>
<div></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11962">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438232077426_11961" style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6092"><span>John</span></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6060"><span><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6093"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6247">The photon fields rotate. </span>Why?</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6096"><span><br clear="none">
</span></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6097">A photon in the electron has a second rotation involving precession. The c is closed or at least nearly closed (knotted, Hopf structure)</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6201"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6200">No vacuum, spacetime, additional dimension required. </div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6200"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6200">The displacement current may be a symptom, not a source.</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6200"><br clear="none">
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6200">D</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6202"><br clear="none">
</div>
<blockquote id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6137" style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16,16,255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6136" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6135" style="font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px;">
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6134">
<hr id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6138" size="1">
<font id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6203" face="Arial" size="2"><b id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6335"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6334" style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> John Duffield <johnduffield@btconnect.com><br clear="none">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> 'David Mathes' <davidmathes8@yahoo.com>; 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<br clear="none">
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:41 AM<br clear="none">
<b id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6408"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6407" style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> RE: [General] The New Aether<br clear="none">
</font></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636y_msg_container" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6204"><br clear="none">
<div id="yiv2974005636"><style>
#yiv2974005636 --
filtered
{font-family:Helvetica;}
#yiv2974005636 filtered
{}
#yiv2974005636 filtered
{font-family:Calibri;}
#yiv2974005636 p.yiv2974005636MsoNormal, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636MsoNormal, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 a:link, #yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv2974005636 a:visited, #yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv2974005636 p.yiv2974005636msonormal, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636msonormal, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636msonormal
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 p.yiv2974005636msochpdefault, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636msochpdefault, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636msochpdefault
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 p.yiv2974005636msonormal1, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636msonormal1, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636msonormal1
{margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636msohyperlink1
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636msohyperlinkfollowed1
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}
#yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636emailstyle181
{color:black;}
#yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636emailstyle191
{color:#1F497D;}
#yiv2974005636 p.yiv2974005636msochpdefault1, #yiv2974005636 li.yiv2974005636msochpdefault1, #yiv2974005636 div.yiv2974005636msochpdefault1
{margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:10.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 span.yiv2974005636EmailStyle30
{color:#1F497D;}
#yiv2974005636 .yiv2974005636MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636 filtered
{margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
#yiv2974005636
BODY {direction:ltr;font-family:Tahoma;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;}#yiv2974005636 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv2974005636 BODY {}</style>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6235">
<div class="yiv2974005636WordSection1" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6234">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6233"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6409" style="">David:</span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6236"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6239"><i id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6238"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6237" style="">What causes the twist or rotation, at least on
a local scale?</span></i></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6240"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6241"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6242" style="">Light. Light is displacement current. It displaces things. Including light. It displaces
its own path into a closed path. Space waves. Space warps. Space is displaced. Space is twisted. Quantum gravity is nothing to do with it. The proton and the electron “exchange field” as they move together. The hydrogen atom has very little in the way of a
field left. But when two hydrogen atoms attract each other gravitationally they don’t exchange field. The field is doubled up.
</span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6243"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6245"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6244" style="">NB, spacetime isn’t space. It’s an abstract thing, it combines the time “dimension” with
the space dimensions, so there is no motion in it. Curved spacetime is actually inhomogeneous space. There is motion in that. The electromagnetic field is curved space. It’s like gravitomagnetism, think frame-dragging, and it’s just waves, there are no speedboats.
The particle is just a stress. A “pulse” of four-potential. </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6410"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6373"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6372" style="">In the JW and vdM model, the photon on a curved path due to something internal to the
photon, but they haven’t gotten the hang of this displacement current thingy yet. The particles
<i>are</i> waves, and the waves are just waves in space. There’s less to it than meets the eye.
</span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6371"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6412"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6411" style="">Regards</span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6364"><span id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6363" style="">John D</span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6365"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6366"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6368">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438106549349_6367" style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;"> General [mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>David Mathes<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> 28 July 2015 17:59<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal"> </div>
<div>
<div id="yiv2974005636">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_2792">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_2791">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_2790">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">John D, John M, John W et al</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_2843">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_5723">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_5723">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">In discussions and conferences, I've always wondered if every speaker was correct in their assertions and data, how could one create a
unified model, and in doing so, no matter how eclectic or kludged that model, perhaps just perhaps lead to insights that eventually to a unified theory. </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_5723">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_5723">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">So the following gendanken attempts to combine the various a few viewpoints to construct a framework of compatibility.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_5723">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4531">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">In the case of the rotation diagram by John D, what causes the twist or rotation, at least on a local scale? To me, something topologically
is missing from the pictograph as if some magician or physicist waved their hands and all of a sudden, in the near field we have a twist or a torsion field. I write this off to a good start on analogy but falls short of a reasonable geometric or topological
reason for the local field twist. A third element - a missing parameter - needs to be included.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4530">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4527">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Can we combine "spaces waves" and "space is twisted" into a coherent theory? Or do we have the correct theory of spacetime, one presumes
quantum gravity?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4527">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4527">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">IMHO there is a failure to properly distinguish between spacetime and the vacuum. Spacetime is a convenient vehicle for one to hitch
a new theory to. After all, it's mainstream and one doesn't have to fuss with all those details about quantum things whereas the vacuum may be full of particles that are mostly harmless, benign masses that do not respond to the current sensitivities of sensors.
After all, the vacuum is not a void. So what is in the vacuum may be a quantum soup be stirred.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Now the JohnD model is similar to that of a circulating particle creating a wake. A speedboat on a lake going in circles (e.g. recovering
a skier) or a rotating rock dropped into water are concrete visual examples of the wakes created by a circulating particle.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">An ideal model would begin with an isentropic and incompressible liquid with low viscosity. As the particle moves through the vacuum/spacetime,
small disturbances are continually generated over a wide frequency spectrum, and therefore, wide spectrum of wavelengths as well. If the phase velocity is <i id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3156">less than</i> the velocity of the particle, then
constructive interference results and shock waves are formed. Perhaps these quantum shock waves form the basis for both E and M fields?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Can one of the 4Pi elementary particle models (Williamson/van der Mark, Gauthier, others) of the electron help in this topological waving
and twisting of something? Perhaps. John and Martin have the right direction with an electron model is constructed from a curving photon. The photon appears confined to a path that at a distance after many cycles the accumulated paths look like a ring torus
where the photon creates a knotted path. (Villarceau circles or Clifford torus?)</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">In the JW and vdM model, is the photon on a curved path due to something internal to the photon or external in the universe? How does
the photon within the electron interact with spacetime or the vacuum? Or more generally, how are mass, charge the curving photon related? </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Beyond the ring torus model, Gauthier does have a set of spindle torus models that might assist in explaining the twist. A charged and
curving photon is proposed. As a 4Pi model, zbw is satisfied. The twist is more pronounced in the spindle torus than the ring torus.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">If there is a photon within the electron, that might begin to explain the twisting action. However, One then needs to ask why the photon
itself curves and twists. </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Why does the photon in the electron dance the jitterbug?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">What's inside the photon? That leads us to the quanta of the photon model, a level below that of elementary particles. </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Is this new level of particles massless? For now, that appears to be a good dividing line between elementary and quanta levels?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">What is the quanta in the photon interacting with: spacetime, vacuum, small dimensions, or something completely different?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">So one might consider the possibility that a rotating quanta is interacting with the surroundings to produce a photon. The directionality
of the photon leads one away from a quanta that may be a spherical model to more of a cylindrical model where one dimension is completely different than the other two which are the same. Now an ellipsoid meets the asymmetric condition of a photon as do a number
of other topologies.</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">In a parametric model such as Gauthier's, the transition between models is continuous, and one can have morphing from sphere to torus
to cylinder along with variants. </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">However, the question remains...are the wave/particles interacting with spacetime, the subzero vacuum, or something completely different?</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_4528">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">David</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white;">
<span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yqt82831">
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_3772">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_3771">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438098053240_3770">
<div align="center" class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;background:white;">
<span style="">
</span><hr align="center" size="1" width="100%">
</div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;"> John Duffield <johnduffield@btconnect.com><br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>
<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 28, 2015 1:38 AM<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3231">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yqt27274">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3215">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3214">
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3213">
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Chip Vivand All:</span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3230">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3212">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">I agree with John that QED doesn’t have much to do with it. Feynman couldn’t even explain a magnet. But even though I’m a relativity
guy, I don’t think that helps either. Instead I think it’s best to go way back, and take a tip from gravitomagnetism here. Check out this NASA article
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3216" target="_blank" href="http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/04may_epic/">
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/04may_epic/</a> where Tony Philips talks about vortices<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Physical_Lines_of_Force">, just like Maxwell did</a>, and says “space
is twisted”. Then think of an electromagnetic field as something similar. Combine the radial electric field lines with concentric magnetic field lines for electromagnetic field lines like this:</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3218">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="">Error! Filename not specified.</span></b><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yui_3_16_0_1_1438102525036_3228">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">There’s a
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://members.optushome.com.au/walshjj/toroid2.jpg">
torus in the middle</a> causing what is in essence frame-dragging, wherein the electromagnetic field is “twisted space”. Or you might call it a “twist field”. Now imagine you were heading into it. For some strange reason this works best if you hold out your
arms like you’re a kid playing planes. What happens if you head into it? You <i>
turn</i>. If you have relative motion with respect to this twist field, and you didn’t know it, you would call it a turn field. That’s what a magnetic field is. A
<i>turn</i> field. We don’t talk of rot and rotor for nothing, electrons don’t go round and round for nothing, see
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Electron_beam_in_a_magnetic_field.jpg">
this picture</a>. The Lorentz force is merely the combination of linear “electric” force and rotational magnetic force that results when two (or more) charged particles interacts. They move like cyclones and anticyclones.
</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="">Error! Filename not specified.</span></b><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">The simplest magnet is the current-in-the-wire. There you have two opposite sets of twist fields which cancel. However one set is moving,
so there’s a net turn field: </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="">Error! Filename not specified.</span></b><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">That’s a magnetic field. Bend the wire into a solenoid to emulate a bar magnet, then bend that again to make a horseshoe magnet. A magnet
is a magnet because all the electrons are moving the same way. In a solenoid they go round in a circle of wire, in a bar magnet they go round domains, but there’s not much difference really. </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">Regards</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">John Duffield</span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white;">
<span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yqt51961">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">
General [mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Chip Akins<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> 28 July 2015 03:01<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Hi Vivian and Michael</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Thank you for your responses.
</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">The interesting thing to me is the fact that when you rotate the disk, there is an electric potential generated across the
disk, but when you rotate the magnet there is no net electrical potential generated. Naively one would expect the same results at any time the disk or magnet are rotated relative to each other, but this is not the case. It is like the magnetic field is, in
a sense, “stationary” in space, regardless of whether the magnet is still or rotating.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Chip</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">
General [<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Vivian Robinson<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 27, 2015 8:28 PM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Hi Chip,</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Magnetic lines of force don't exist. They are a convenient representation of an observed magnetic effect such as the lines
that iron filings form when placed in a magnetic field. You can't corral them by getting a magnetised wire to draw them in and so concentrate them. At least I couldn't when I was tried the experiment many years ago. Quantum electrodynamics (QED) specialists
are more experience in magnetism than myself and maybe one of them can give some more information. IMHO, the reason for the noise generated when the magnet was rotated was because of the non uniform nature of the magnetic's field. When the stator is rotated
it is also moving through a magnetic field. I am not aware of Einstein's relativity theories have anything to say about magnetic fields. Over to QED experts. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Cheers,</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Vivian Robinson</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yqt71665">
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">On 28/07/2015, at 1:46 AM, Chip Akins <<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com">chipakins@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Hi All</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">A friend forwarded this video regarding magnetic fields.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">It is quite interesting.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gduYoT9sMaE"><span style="color:purple;">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gduYoT9sMaE</span></a></span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">I am interested in hearing your views and thoughts on this phenomenon.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Chip</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">From:</span></b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">General
[mailto:general-<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:40 AM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">Thank you, John, W, Vivian R. and John M.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">As a part of the facilitating system, I am pleased to see that the overall contents of the discussion are
conducive to collective learning. Collective learning is at the core of the unusually successful evolution of the human neural network compared to all other species. The best part of the collective learning is that I do not need to spend all my life to find
out that my logically self-consistent and elegant theory is based upon postulates that are insufficiently connected with the ongoing natural processes. We need system engineering thinking in all human endeavors; we need collective and iterative thinking.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">Thanks to all of you that the forum is maintaining its serious enquiry of nature; rather than telling nature
how she ought to behave!</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;"> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">Chandra.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" name="_MailEndCompose" href=""><span style=""><span class="yiv2974005636MsoHyperlink"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;">PS:
I owe a separate personal reply to John M.; will do so in a couple of days.</span></span></span></a><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;">From:</span></b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;">General
[<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style="color:purple;">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a>]<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></b>John Williamson<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:45 AM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br clear="none">
<b>Cc:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Joakim Pettersson; Nick Bailey; Anthony Booth; Manohar .; Ariane Mandray<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;">Hi John M,<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I think you are confusing proof and disproof. There tends to a be a popular mis-conception that an experiment can "prove" a theory. Not so, an experiment may be consistent or inconsistent with a theory - no more. This means that a well-constructed experiment
may, in a sense, disprove a theory, but not prove it. If an experiment is inconsistent with a theory - within the realm of validity of that theory - then that theory should, in the proper operation of the scientific method, be either modified or discarded.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Now you have raised some questions below, not of any of our models, but of science as it stands. Though this has little or nothing to do with the subject of the upcoming conference, I am going to try to help you by answering those questions, within the context
of science-as-it-stands. I'm not then going to enter into further discussion to defend those theories for you - this is not my job and I have neither the time nor the energy for it. If you want to go deeper into this you can read the papers on it by Feynmann
and others, or look into one of the many textbooks on QED. This is a one off. I will answer in blue.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div align="center" class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;background:white;">
<span style="">
</span><hr align="center" size="3" width="100%">
</div>
<div id="yiv2974005636divRpF138785">
<div style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;">From:</span></b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;">General
[<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank" href="mailto:general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general-bounces+john.williamson=glasgow.ac.uk@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] on behalf of John Macken [<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:john@macken.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:john@macken.com">john@macken.com</a>]<br clear="none">
<b>Sent:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Wednesday, July 22, 2015 8:52 PM<br clear="none">
<b>To:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'<br clear="none">
<b>Subject:</b><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] The New Aether</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Vivian and All.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">I have been away and was not able to answer Vivian’s objections contained in her July 17 post dealing with my paper titled
“Energetic Spacetime: the New Aether”. On several of her points she demanded that I had to be able to show the experimental proof in order for a point to be valid.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">This is not so. Viv was talking about a discrepancy with experiment.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> I must admit that as I read this comment I wondered why this demand was being directed at me. Everyone in this group
including Vivian and Chandra has offered theoretical models which lack experimental proof.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">This mis-states the position of others.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">In fact, most progress in physics happens when a theoretical prediction is made which initially lacks experimental proof.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Not so. It is discrepancy with the existing body of knowledge that usually drives folk to question. The initial driving discrepancy
may not, indeed, correspond with what are later seen as "successes" of a model.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">The experimental proof then follows as the idea matures. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">No theory is ever "proven" by any one experiment.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">For example, general relativity was purely theoretical until the bending of light by the sun’s gravity was experimentally
measured in 1919. The experiment would not have been performed without the theoretical prediction. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Oh yes it would. Photons would have been known to carry energy and momentum. there would have been an argument like that in
Martin's "light is heavy" and someone would have looked at how these move in a gravitational field by now.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">General relativity remains unproven. It is only the case that, to first order, General relativity is consistent with the facts.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Another problem is that objections were registered without also addressing the arguments I gave to support my conclusions.
The central point was that there is no support for my contention that vacuum energy has energy density in excess to 10<sup>-9</sup>J/m<sup>3</sup>. However, before addressing this point, I want to discuss the competition to my model of particles and forces.
The competition has the electrostatic force being transferred by virtual photons. There is absolutely no experimental proof that virtual photons transfer the electrostatic force. In fact, there are numerous reasons to doubt this.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">John, there is a theory called quantum electrodynamics (QED). It is consistent with a vast range of experimental phenomena.
Have you ever studied it? I'm going to give some trite answers based on that theory - and which I could have answered as a postgrad back in 1980. I will not come back to defend them because I myself do not think QED is complete, but I have better things to
do than to regurgitate things you could read from a big book. I recommend "Landau and Lifshitz - QED". Anyway, showing that someone else has a problem - even if you had done that which you have not - does not then prove that you are right.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">For example: 1) How is attraction achieved?</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">As I have said before in many posts: virtual photons can carry negative 4-momentum squared.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">2) How does an electric field achieve measurable energy density from “virtual” photons?</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">You have a lot of them.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">3) What exactly is a virtual photon? (size, wavelength, frequency, etc.)</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Stupid question. Any size, any wavelength , any frequency. Even "real" photons can do that. A virtual photon is a theoretical
construct in the theory of QED. Read the book.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> 4) How does a virtual photon locate a distant electron?</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Good point. This is relatively hard. It is dealt with in QED by assigning a probability to emit (based on the fine structure
constant) and a probability to absorb (ditto). The primary interaction matrix element then goes as alpha- squared times some geometrical factors. You need to understand as well that, as the distant electron becomes more and more distant the "virtual" photon
becomes less and less virtual and more and more real. In fact, even for a few tens of wavelengths, the exchange photon is 99.9999 percent "real". There are higher order effects for exotic kinds of interactions (virtual photons!). These, if calculated - give
pretty much exactly the effects observed in experiment. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">To understand the deeper implied point better, however, you need to look first at Carver Mead's keynote talk at last years
SPIE conference. Then look at Al Kracklauer's translation of Tetrode's paper (look on his website), then read Wheeler and Feynmann's paper then try to understand how this can still be consistent with causality (this is hard and may take you some time. Think
- energy.).</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> I could go on, but you get the point. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">I could go on but you get the point.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Also, the competition says that the gravitational force is transferred by either the geometry of curved spacetime or by
virtual gravitons. Both of these also have problems. Curved spacetime is fine to explain a particle following a geodesic, but there is a real force when two masses are physically held apart. Where does this force come from?</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Easy: masses share the "bend". Many hands make light work. All that sort of thing.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Curved spacetime does not explain the gravitational force. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Oh yes it does. Do you think no-one would have noticed? Many others in the group ... Viv, David, Reg, Al ... know much more
about this than I do. It would be good for you to talk to them at the conference.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">In other words, there is no experimental proof that the geometry of spacetime can generate a force corresponding to the
gravitational force. Also, gravitons have many of the same problems previously enumerated for virtual photons. There is no experimental proof of gravitons.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">True - as far as I know. Unless someone in the wider group, more specialist or widely-read than I knows better? David? Reg?
Al? The fact that there is no proof for someone else's theory has little, or no, bearing on your own though. Also, while there is no experimental "proof" for gravitons there is no experimental disproof either. No inconsistency with experiment then. Also gravitons
have absolutely nothing to do with the upcoming conference.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">My explanation of both the electrostatic force and gravity is based on the idea that vacuum energy is real. The uncertainty
principle implies that the distance between points varies by<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">±</span><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">Planck
length (L<sub>p</sub>) and perfect clocks in flat spacetime can differ by<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">±</span><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">Planck
time (T<sub>p</sub>). This simple insight is the basis for the wave-based energy density of spacetime. This energy density has been calculated and shown to be vastly different from the observable energy density which averages10<sup>-9</sup><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>J/m<sup>3</sup>.
It is also the basis of everything in the universe – all particles, fields and forces. No extra dimensions are needed. How come when people freely propose extra dimensions there is no chorus demanding experimental proof? However, when energetic spacetime
is assumed, then objections are heard even though there is numerous reasons to believe that the vacuum has energy density.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">I think the main reason for this is that energies and masses on this scale are simply not observed. When people make up extra
dimensions they do so usually in an area where they ought not to be observed - being very small or only manifesting at an absurdly large energy scale. You start in an area where such energies and masses - if they are energies and masses - should by easily
observed by looking out of the window.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Unlike virtual messenger particles transferring forces, this wave-based particle model has real predictions which were
easy to prove correct.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">This statement is simply not true. QED predicts, it is true, but it also calculates. So far, with the possible exception of
tiny discrepancies in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon w.r.t. that of the electron, its calculations agree exactly with experiment. It calculates to many decimal places. Experiment is still catching up with extending those decimal places by further
orders. Down at one part in a million or less. You have shouted a lot about your model - but the only actual number I have seen calculated from it - the electron charge- is out by more than two orders of magnitude.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">For example, the first set of predictions were that both the electrostatic force and the gravitational force were the result
of waves generated by fundamental particles at the particle’s Compton frequency. When these forces were expressed in the natural units of the particles, they would reveal that gravity was a nonlinear effect that scaled with wave amplitude squared and electrostatic
effects scaled with wave amplitude to the first power. In other words, it should be possible to prove or disprove whether this model was correct by doing either a calculation or an experiment which tested this relationship. In the paper<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><u>Spacetime
Based Foundation of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity</u><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>equations 15 to 23 show that these predictions are correct.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">I looked at this, but all you seem to have done, to me, is plugged in Newton's force law - and a set of other well-known relations
in your equation 13, provided only that you also plug in a value of the electron charge which is more than two orders of magnitude out. This is not, in my a book, a prediction. Also, even after all of this, you seem to get no further than Newton's law of gravitation.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> I have subsequently generated other equations showing the close relationship between the gravitational force and the
electrostatic force. This “foundation” paper was previously attached to my posts and is also available at<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://onlyspacetime.com/QM-Foundation.pdf"><span style="color:purple;">http://onlyspacetime.com/QM-Foundation.pdf</span></a></span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://onlyspacetime.com/QM-Foundation.pdf"><span style="color:purple;"><br clear="none">
</span></a></span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Both the Newtonian gravitational equation and the Coulomb law equation have been experimentally verified. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">To a first approximation. The Newton theory is modified, as you know in GR and the Coulomb law breaks down at short distances
(the running coupling constant).</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Therefore, showing how there equations are related by a square is the same as doing an experiment.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Oh no it isn't.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">The fact they are related by an inverse square shows only that both are consistent, to first order, with being transmitted
by a conserved fluid in 3D. No more and no less.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">If you are looking for predictions which have not been experimentally verified, I have those also. In chapter 9 of my
book I discuss an electric field experiment that should be possible but difficult. However, even then I am able to show that it is possible to verify the accuracy of the prediction with a thought experiment. Suppose that it was possible to increase the intensity
of a laser beam to arbitrarily large powers. If the beam is focused to 1 wavelength in diameter, then the prediction is that it should be possible to reach a condition where the properties of spacetime would achieve 100% modulation of the vacuum energy density
at the laser’s wavelength. Spacetime should be incapable of transmitting more power than the predicted 100% modulation level through the focused spot. Imagine that this experiment was performed by some advanced civilization. At great expense, they would
discover that this prediction was correct. The 100% modulation level corresponds to the level that makes a black hole. Once the black hole forms, no further light could be transmitted through this volume of spacetime – just as predicted.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Dear John, you seem quite safe to me for the time being with this experiment. I tried doing the sums. Perhaps I made a mistake
so correct me if I am wrong. The poor old laser, if blue, would need a power source rather larger than that which could be obtained by annihilating the entire universe with an equivalent antimatter universe- since the energy contained in a 200nm (Half the
wavelength of blue light) cube in your model, to get to "the 100 percent modulation limit" far exceeds the energy of the energy of the entire universe by many many orders of magnitude. This is going to take some serious engineering. Do the sums. Also, I would
not recommend having a go at this as annihilating the whole of our universe, just to "prove" a theory would not necessarily be a good idea.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Finally, the “New Aether” paper contains a new calculation which gives the “interactive” density<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><i>ρ<sub>i</sub></i>,</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">The fact you put "interactive" in quotes is telling.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">energy density<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><i>U<sub>i</sub></i>, mass<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><i>m<sub>i</sub></i><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>and
energy<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><i>e</i><sub>i</sub><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>encountered by a gravitational wave with angular frequency<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">ω</span><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="">and
reduced wavelength<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span><i><s>λ</s></i>. Ignoring the numerical constant k, these equations are very simple:</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">ρ<sub>i</sub><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>=<span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span></span></i><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">ω</span></i><i><sup><span lang="EN-US" style="">2</span></sup></i><span lang="EN-US" style="">/</span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">G</span></i><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">U<sub>i</sub><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>= F<sub>p</sub></span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="">/</span><i><s><span lang="EN-US" style="">λ</span></s></i><i><sup><span lang="EN-US" style="">2</span></sup></i><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">m<sub>i</sub><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>= Z<sub>s</sub></span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="">/<i>ω</i></span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><i><span lang="EN-US" style="">e<sub>i</sub><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>= F<sub>p</sub><s>λ</s></span></i><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">These are all explained in the aether paper. I know that none of these will not be completely satisfying, but they are
given because they imply that different frequencies encounter different amount of energy density. Only Planck frequency encounters 10<sup>113</sup><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>J/m<sup>3</sup><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>energy
density.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">If interactive, these interactions are huge on a human scale. You should be able to feel them by waving your hand. You do
not.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">If you have no need for a higher frequency than the Compton frequency of the Higgs boson, then you need not concern yourself
with energy density higher than about 10<sup>46</sup><span class="yiv2974005636apple-converted-space"> </span>J/m<sup>3</sup>. This also happens to be the energy density of the Higgs field from QED. </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">The Higgs field is not in QED. It is an additional part of the "standard model". QED deals with just the interaction of light
and (charged) matter.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">John, a general comment. I have been putting a lot of effort and time into this for your benefit and for the benefit of others
in the group. I like some of what you have done, and have been doing, and there is some serious content in some aspects of your ideas. Attacking others, especially physics-as-it-stands, is a waste of everyone's energy and talent. It is beginning to piss me
off. Please stick to either developing your own ideas, or posting (preferably constructive) criticism of things that are actually in the theme of this conference.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">John M.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="">Regards, John W.</span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:13.5pt;">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:viv@etpsemra.com.au" target="_blank" href="mailto:viv@etpsemra.com.au">viv@etpsemra.com.au</a><br clear="none">
<a href="<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40etpsemra.com.au?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/viv%40etpsemra.com.au?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br clear="none">
Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none">
</a></span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span lang="EN-US" style=""> </span><span style=""></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style=""> </span></div>
<div id="yiv2974005636yqt28803">
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="background:white;"><span style="">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com">davidmathes8@yahoo.com</a><br clear="none">
<a href="<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" target="_blank" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br clear="none">
Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none">
</a></span></div>
</div>
<div class="yiv2974005636MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white;">
<span style=""> </span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>
</div></div><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></div></div></div></body></html>