<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="-1">John,<br>
<br>
You wrote a long text, so I will enter my answers within your
text.<br>
</font><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 14.09.2015 um 02:54 schrieb John
Macken:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \,serif";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:#20188C;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:#20188C;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:#20188C;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:582760371;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:413293532 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:o;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:"Courier New";}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-family:Wingdings;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:757141588;
mso-list-template-ids:721092480;}
@list l1:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l1:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">Hello David and Albrecht,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">It was through the contact
with this group that I was finally able to understand the
disconnect that existed between my idea of vacuum energy and
the picture that others were obtaining from my use of the
term “energy”. Many of the mysteries of quantum mechanics
and general relativity can be traced to the fact that fields
exist and yet we do not have a clear idea of what they are.
My answer is that we live within a sea of vacuum activity
which is the physical basis of the mysterious fields. I
combine all fields into a single “spacetime field” which is
the basis of all particles, fields and forces. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">David</span></b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">, you asked about the words</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"> quantum, quantifying and quantizing</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">. I did a word search and I
did not use the word “quantizing” in either the email or the
attachment to my last post. However, the paper <i>Energetic
Spacetime: The New Aether</i> submitted to SPIE as part of
the conference presentation, used and defines the word
“quantization”. This paper was attached to previous posts,
and is available at my website: </span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://onlyspacetime.com/">http://onlyspacetime.com/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">Albrecht</span></b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">: I can combine my answer
to you with the clarification for David of the word
“quantify” and its derivatives. I claim that my model of
the universe “quantifies” particles and fields. I will
start my explanation of this concept by giving examples of
models which do not “quantify” particles and fields. There
have been numerous particle models from this group and
others which show an electron model as two balls orbiting
around a center of mass. Most of the group identifies these
balls as photons but Albrecht names the two balls “charges
of the strong force”. Both photons and charges of strong
force are just words. To be quantifiable, it is necessary to
describe the model of the universe which gives the strong
force or the electromagnetic force. What exactly are these?
How much energy and energy density does one charge of strong
force have? Can a photon occupy a volume smaller than a
reduced Compton wavelength in radius? Does a muon have the
same basic strong force charge but just rotate faster? Are
the charges of strong force or photons made of any other
more basic component?</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<span
style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:107%;font-family:"Times
New Roman",serif;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New
Roman";mso-ansi-language:DE;mso-fareast-language:
DE;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA"><br>
Regarding charge: This is a basic entity in my model. At some
point a physical theory has to start. My model starts with the
assumption that a charge is an "atomic" entity, so possibly
point-like, which emits exchange particles (in this point I follow
the general understanding of QM). There are two types of charges:
the electric ones which we are very familiar with, having two
signs, and the strong ones, which are not so obvious in everyday
physics; they also have two signs. In the physical nature we find
the charges of the strong force only in configurations made of
those different signs, never isolated. This is in contrast to the
electric charges. <br>
<br>
The basic particles are composed of a collection of charges of the
strong force so that both basic particles are bound to each other
in a way that they keep a certain distance. This distance
characterizes an elementary particle. In several (or most) cases
there is additionally an electric charge in the basic particle.<br>
<br>
The two parameters I have to set - or to find - are the shape of
the strong field in the elementary particle. Here I have defined
an equation describing a minimum multi-pole field to make the
elementary particle stable. The other setting is the strength of
this field. This strength can be found e.g. using the electron
because the electron is well known and precisely measured. This
field is then applicable for all leptons as well as for all
quarks. It is also applicable for the photon with the restriction
that there may be a correction factor caused by the fact that the
photon is not fundamental in the sense of this model but composed
of (maybe) two other particles. <br>
<br>
The size of the photon is (at least roughly) described by its
wavelength. This follows from the mass formula resulting from my
model, as with this assumption the (dynamic) mass of the photon is
the correct result.<br>
<br>
As I wrote, the results of this model are very precise, the prove
is in practice only limited by limitations of the measurement
processes.</span>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">I could go on with more
questions until it is possible to calculate the properties
of an electron from the answers. So far both models lack
any quantifiable details except perhaps a connection to the
particle’s Compton frequency. I am not demanding anything
more than I have already done. For example, I cannot
calculate the electron’s Compton frequency or the fine
structure constant. However, once I install these into the
model that I create, and combine this with the properties of
the spacetime field, then I get an electron. Installing a
muon’s Compton frequency generates a muon with the correct
electric field, electrostatic force, curvature of spacetime,
gravitational force and de Broglie waves. I am able to
quantify the distortion of spacetime produced by a charged
particle, an electric field and a photon. I am able to test
these models and show that they generate both the correct
energy density and generate a black hole when we reach the
distortion limits of the spacetime field. </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
In my model the Compton frequency of the electron (and of the other
leptons) follows directly from the size of the particle and the fact
that the basic particle move with c. The fine structure constant
tells us the relation of the electric force to the strong force.
This explanation follows very directly from this model, however was
also found by other theorists using algebra of particle physics.<br>
<br>
Another result of the model is that Planck's constant - multiplied
by c - is the field constant of the strong force. Also this is the
result of other models (however not of mainstream physics).<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">My model starts with a
quantifiable description of the properties of spacetime.
The spacetime model has a specific impedance which describes
the properties of waves that can exist in spacetime. Then
the amplitude and frequency of the waves in spacetime is
quantified. This combination allows the energy density of
spacetime to be calculated and this agrees with the energy
density of zero point energy. The particle models are then
defined as ½ </span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria
Math",serif;color:#20188C">ħ</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"> units of quantized angular
momentum existing in the spacetime field. This model is
quantifiable as to size, structure, energy, etc. Also the
fact that the rate of time and proper volume is being
modulated, it is possible to calculate the effect that such
a structure would have on the surrounding volume of
spacetime. It is possible to calculate the effect if the
spacetime-based particle model would have if the coupling
constant was equal to 1 (Planck charge), To get charge <i>e</i>,
it is necessary to manually install the fine structure
constant. </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
How do you get the value <span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">½ </span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria
Math",serif;color:#20188C">ħ</span> for the angular momentum?
What is the calculation behind it? - I understand that in your model
the electric charge is a parameter deduced from other facts. Which
ones? From alpha? How do you then get alpha?<br>
<br>
I personally have in so far a problem with all considerations using
spacetime as I have quite thoroughly investigated how Einstein came
to the idea of this 4-dimentional construct. His main motivation was
that he wanted in any case to avoid an ether. And in his discussions
with Ernst Mach he had to realize that he was running into a lot of
problems with this assumption. He could solve these problems in
general by his "curved spacetime". But this concept still causes
logical conflicts which are eagerly neglected by the followers of
Einstein's relativity (and which do not exist in the Lorentzian way
of relativity).
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">The quantifiable properties
of spacetime imply that there should be boundary conditions
which imply that the waves in spacetime should be
nonlinear. When the nonlinear component is calculated and
treated as separate waves, the characteristics of the
particle’s gravitational field are obtained (correct:
curvature, effect on the rate of time, force and energy
density).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">In my last post I have
given an answer about the factor of 10<sup>120</sup>
difference between the observable energy density of the
universe and the non-observable energy of the universe.
This non-observable energy density is absolutely necessary
for QED calculations, zero point energy, the uncertainty
principle, Lamb shift, spontaneous emission and quantum
mechanics in general. This non-observable energy density is
responsible for the tremendously large impedance of
spacetime c<sup>3</sup>/G. Since I can also show how this
non-observable energy density is obtainable from
gravitational wave equations, it is necessary for <b>you</b>
to show how all these effects can be achieved without
spacetime being a single field with this non-observable
energy density. In fact, the name non-observable only
applied to direct observation. The indirect evidence is
everywhere. It forms the basis of the universe and
therefore is the “background noise” of the universe. For
this reason it is not directly observable because we can
only detect differences in energy. The constants <i>c,</i>
<i>G</i>, </span><i><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria
Math",serif;color:#20188C">ħ</span></i><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"> and <i>ε<sub>o</sub></i>
testify that spacetime is not an empty void. </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Up to now I did not find any necessity for zero-point energy. And I
find it a dangerous way to assume physical facts which cannot be
observed. The greatest argument in favour of this energy is its use
in Feynman diagrams. But is there really no other way? I have a
lecture of Feynman here where he states that his formalism has good
results. But that he has no physical understanding why it is
successful. In my understanding of the development of physics this
is a weak point.<br>
<br>
The discrepancy of 10^120 between assumed and observed energy is
taken as a great and unresolved problem by present main stream
physics. Those representatives would have all reason to find a
solution to keep present QM clean. But they are not able to. This
causes me some concern.<br>
<br>
The constants you have listed: c is the speed of light what ever the
reason for it is. (I have a model, but it is a bit speculative.) But
it has nothing to do with energy. G is the gravitational constant
which is as little understood as gravity itself. Planck's constant I
have explained, it is (with c) the field constant of the strong
force (any force has to be described by a field constant); and <span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><i>ε<sub>o</sub></i></span> is
the field constant of the electric force with a similar background.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">If spacetime was an empty
void, why should particles have a speed limit of <i>c</i>?
For a thought experiment, suppose that two spaceships leave
earth going opposite directions and accelerate until they
reach a speed of 0.75 <i>c</i> relative to the earth. The
earth bound observer sees them separating at 1.5 <i>c</i>
but the rules of relativistic addition of velocity has a
spaceship observer seeing the other spaceship moving away at
only 0.96 <i>c</i>. How is this possible if spacetime is
an empty void. My model of the universe answers this
because all particles, fields and forces are also made of
the spacetime field and they combine to achieve Lorentz
transformations which affects ruler length and clocks. None
of this can happen unless spacetime is filled with dipole
waves in spacetime and everything is made of the single
component. The universe is only spacetime. </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
If two spaceships move at 0.75 c in opposite direction, the observer
at rest may add these speeds and may get 1.5 c as a result. Why not?
If an observer in one of the spaceships measures the relative speed
of the other spaceship, the result will be less then c (as you write
it). The reason is the well known fact that the measurement tools
accessible for the observer in the ship are changed and run
differently at this high speed. The reason for these changes is for
time dilation the internal speed c in elementary particles. For
contraction it is the contraction of fields at motion which is a
fact independent of relativity (and which was already known before
Einstein). In addition when the speed of another object is to be
measured several clocks are to be used positioned along the
measurement section. These clocks are de-synchronized in relation to
the clocks of the observer at rest. These phenomena together cause
the measurement result < c. You find these considerations in
papers and books about the Lorentzian interpretation of relativity.
So, following Lorentz, there is no reason to assume Einstein's
spacetime.<span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> <br>
</o:p></span>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C">John M.</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Perhaps I should read your book. But that chould take a lot of time,
I am afraid.<br>
<br>
Albrecht<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:007301d0ee87$df0903d0$9d1b0b70$@macken.com"
type="cite">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#20188C"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"> Dr. Albrecht Giese [<a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de">mailto:genmail@a-giese.de</a></a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, September 13, 2015 1:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> John Macken <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:john@macken.com"><john@macken.com></a>;
'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] research papers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hello John,<br>
<br>
great that you have looked so deeply into the model which I
have presented. Thank you.<br>
<br>
There are some questions which I can answer quite easily. I
think that this model in fact explains several points just in
contrast to main stream physics. In standard physics the
electron (just as an example) is a point-like object without
any internal structure. So, how can a magnetic moment be
explained? How can the spin be explained? How can the mass be
explained? The position of main stream physics is: That cannot
be explained but is subject to quantum mechanics. And the fact
that it cannot be explained shows how necessary QM is.<br>
<br>
In contrast, if the electron is assumed to have a structure
like in the model presented, these parameters can be explained
in a classical way, and this explanation is not merely a
qualitative one but has precise quantitative results.<br>
<br>
To your questions in detail:<br>
The fact of two basic particles is necessary to explain the
fact of an oscillation and to fulfil the conservation of
momentum. A single object (as point-like) cannot oscillate.
The basic particles are composed of charges of the strong
force. In this model the strong force is assumed to be the
universal force in our world effective on all particles. A
charge is a fundamental object in the scope of this model.
There are two kinds of charges according to the two kinds of
forces in our world, the strong one and the electric one. The
weak force is in fact the strong force but has a smaller
coupling constant caused by geometric circumstances. And
gravity is not a force at all but a refraction process, which
is so a side effect of the other forces. And, by the way,
gravity is not curved spacetime. This is not necessary, and
besides of this, Einstein's spacetime leads to logical
conflicts.<br>
<br>
The forces (i.e. strong force) inside an elementary particle
are configured in a way that at a certain distance there is a
potential minimum and in this way the distance between the
basic particles is enforced. So, this field has attracting and
repulsive components. Outside the elementary particle the
attracting forces dominate to make the particle a stable one.
And those field parts outside have an opposite sign. Now, as
the basic particles are orbiting each other, the outside field
is an alternating field (of the strong forth). If this field
propagates, it is builds a wave. This wave is described by the
Schrödinger equation and fulfils the assumptions of de
Broglie. <br>
<br>
With the assumption of two basic particles orbiting at c and
subject to strong force, the parameters mass, magnetic moment,
spin result from it numerically correctly without further
assumptions.<br>
<br>
This model does not need any vacuum energy or virtual
particles. Those are simply not necessary and they are anyway
very speculative because not directly observable. And in the
case of the vacuum energy of the universe we are confronted
with the discrepancy of 10^120 which you also mention in your
paper attached to your mail.<br>
<br>
The Coulomb law can be easily explained by the assumption
(standard at quantum mechanics) that a force is realized by
exchange particles. The density of exchange particles and so
the strength of the field diminishes by 1/r^2, which is simple
geometry. <br>
<br>
So John, this is my position. Now I am curious about your
objections of further questions.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
Albrecht<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:12.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Am 11.09.2015 um 23:51 schrieb John
Macken:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Hello
Albrecht and All,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">I have
attached a one page addition that I will make to my book.
It is a preliminary explanation of my model of the
spacetime field. It has been very helpful to me to
interact with this group because I now understand better
the key stumbling block for some scientists to accept my
thesis. Therefore I have written the attached
introduction to ease the reader of my book into my model.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Albrecht:</span></b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt"> I appreciate your email. We
agree on several points which include the size of the
electron and there is a similarity in the explanation of
gravity. The key points of disagreement are the same as I
have with the rest of the group. Your explanation of a
fundamental particle is not really an explanation. You
substitute a fundamental particle such as an electron with
two “basic particles”. Have we made any progress or did
we just double the problem? What is your basic particles
made of? What is the physics behind the force of
attraction between the particles? What is the physics
behind an electric field? How does your model create de
Broglie waves? How does your model create a gravitational
field (curved spacetime)? Can you derive the Coulomb law
and Newtonian gravitational equation from your model? </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">These
might seem like unfair questions, but my model does all of
these things. All it requires is the reader accept the
fact that the vacuum possesses activity which can be
characterized as a type of energy density that is not
observable (no rest mass or momentum). This is no
different that accepting that QED calculations should be
believed when they assume vacuum energy or that zero point
energy really exists. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Albrecht</span></b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt">, perhaps I have come on too
strong, but I have decided to take a firmer stand. You
just happen to be the first person that I contrast to my
model. I am actually happy to discuss the scientific
details in a less confrontational way. I just wanted to
make an initial point.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">John M. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="color:windowtext"> General [<a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Dr. Albrecht Giese<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 11, 2015 9:52 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] research papers</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear John Macken,<br>
<br>
I would like to answer a specific topic in your mail below.
You write "... would have particular relevance to the
concept that the Higgs field is needed to give inertia to
fermions".<br>
<br>
We should not overlook that even mainstream physicists
working on elementary particles admit that the Higgs theory
is not able to explain inertia. I give you as a reference:
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:3.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:3.0pt;margin-left:0in;text-align:justify"><span
lang="EN-GB">>Steven D. Brass, The cosmological
constant puzzle, Journal of Physics G, Nuclear and
Particle Physics 38, 4(2011) 43201< ,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif",serif">which has the result that the Higgs
field, which causes inertia according to the theory, is by
at least 56 orders of magnitude too small to explain the
mass of the elementary particles. (Another weakness is the
fact that the Higgs theory does not tell us the mass of
any elementary particle even if all other parameters are
known.)<br>
<br>
As you may remember, in our meeting I have presented a
model explaining inertia which does not only work as a
general idea but provides very precise results for the
mass of leptons. The mass is classically deduced from the
size of a particle. It also explains the mass of quarks,
but here the verification is more difficult, due to the
lack of measurements. In addition I have shown that the
model also explains the (dynamic) mass of photons, if the
size of a photon is related to its wavelength. <br>
<br>
You may find details in the proceedings of our San Diego
meeting, but also on the following web sites:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ag-physics.org/rmass">www.ag-physics.org/rmass</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ag-physics.org/electron">www.ag-physics.org/electron</a>
.<br>
<br>
You may also find the sites by Google search entering the
string "origin of mass". You will find it on position 1 or
2 of the list, where it has constantly been during the
past 12 years.<br>
<br>
If you have any questions about it, please ask me. I will
be happy about any discussion.<br>
<br>
With best regards<br>
Albrecht Giese<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman ,serif",serif">Am 04.09.2015 um 18:40 schrieb
John Macken:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Martin,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">I wanted
to remind you that I think that you should update your
article “Light Is Heavy” to include the mathematical
proof that confined light has exactly the same inertia
as particles with equal energy. Accelerating a
reflecting box causes different photon pressure which
results in a net inertial force. I already reference
your Light Is Heavy article in my book, but expanding
the article would be even better. An expanded article
would have particular relevance to the concept that the
Higgs field is needed to give inertia to fermions. The
Higgs field is not needed to give inertia to confined
light. Furthermore, confined light exerts exactly the
correct inertia and kinetic energy, even at relativistic
conditions. I have not seen a proof that the Higgs
field gives exactly the correct amount of inertia or
kinetic energy to fermions. Any particle model that
includes either a confined photon or confined waves in
spacetime propagating at the speed of light gets inertia
and kinetic energy from the same principles as confined
light in a reflecting box.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">John M.
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> General [<a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+john=macken.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mark, Martin van der<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, September 04, 2015 6:34 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General
Discussion <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] research papers<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D">Dear all,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D">My recent (and old) work can be
found on Researchgate:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Van_der_Mark/publications">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Van_der_Mark/publications</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D">In particular you will find the
most recent work:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:#1F497D;margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo3">On the nature of “stuff” and the hierarchy
of forces<o:p></o:p></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"
style="color:#1F497D;margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-list:l0
level1 lfo3">Quantum mechanical probability current as
electromagnetic 4-current from topological EM fields<o:p></o:p></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D">Very best regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:10.0pt"><span
style="color:#1F497D">Martin</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy"
lang="DE">Dr. Martin B. van der Mark</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Principal
Scientist, Minimally Invasive Healthcare</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:navy"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Philips
Research Europe - Eindhoven</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">High
Tech Campus, Building 34 (WB2.025)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Prof.
Holstlaan 4</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">5656
AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Tel:
+31 40 2747548</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
align="center"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif">
<hr size="3" width="100%" align="center"></span></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:gray">The
information contained in this message may be
confidential and legally protected under applicable law.
The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or
reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and
may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy
all copies of the original message.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman ,serif",serif"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif",serif"><br>
<br>
<br>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
align="center"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif",serif">
<hr style="color:#909090" noshade="noshade" size="1"
width="99%" align="center"></span></div>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="border-collapse:collapse"
border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 11.25pt 0in 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman ,serif",serif"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus"><span
style="border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in;text-decoration:none"><img
id="_x0000_i1027"
src="cid:part14.00000100.01000204@a-giese.de"
alt="Image removed by sender. Avast logo"
height="100" width="100" border="0"></span></a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#3D4D5A">Diese
E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf
Viren geprüft. <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">www.avast.com</a>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman
,serif",serif"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center" align="center"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif">
<hr style="color:#909090" noshade="noshade" size="1"
width="99%" align="center"></span></div>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="border-collapse:collapse"
border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:0in 11.25pt 0in 6.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus"><span
style="border:solid windowtext
1.0pt;padding:0in;text-decoration:none"><img
id="_x0000_i1029"
src="cid:part14.00000100.01000204@a-giese.de"
alt="Image removed by sender. Avast logo"
height="100" width="100" border="0"></span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p><span
style="font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#3D4D5A">Diese
E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren
geprüft. <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">www.avast.com</a>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
<tr>
<td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">
<img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
</a>
</td>
<td>
<p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
<br><a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">www.avast.com</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>