<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8614" dir="ltr">Hello Al K. I read in your paper that you welcomed a beam-split coincidence experiment that defied the photon model. </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8614" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8624"><a href="http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2441836&resultClick=1" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8887">http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2441836&resultClick=1</a> , my SPIE 2015 paper. I welcome anyone to see it in Pacifica CA. </span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8614" dir="ltr">Thanks</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8614" dir="ltr">Eric Reiter</div><br> <blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8620"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8619"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8618"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8617"> <hr size="1" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8630"> <font size="2" face="Arial" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8616"> <b id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8628"><span style="font-weight:bold;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1445924949618_8627">From:</span></b> "af.kracklauer@web.de" <af.kracklauer@web.de><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> phys@a-giese.de; general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>; Joakim Pettersson <joakimbits@gmail.com>; Ariane Mandray <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, October 27, 2015 8:11 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [General] research papers<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container"><br><div id="yiv1213890589"><div><div style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:12.0px;"><div>Hi All:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>In paper No. 11 on www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com I published some ideas on the origin and nanture of deBroglie waves. Seems to me some of the objections and obscurities mentioned below are delt with therein. Take a look, see what you think. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, Al</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px;padding:10px 0 10px 10px;border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5;word-wrap:break-word;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 15:39 Uhr<br>
<b>Von:</b> "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <genmail@a-giese.de><br>
<b>An:</b> "Richard Gauthier" <richgauthier@gmail.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>, "Joakim Pettersson" <joakimbits@gmail.com>, "Ariane Mandray" <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] research papers</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255);">Hello Richard (and all),<br>
<br>
thank you, Richard, for your informations. You find my answers and comments in your text.<br>
<br>
However I see here two general problems which should be reviewed by all.<br>
<br>
1.) The fact that the de Broglie wave regarding its definition and its use is <i>not </i>Lorentz-invariant. So it is incompatible with our physical understanding since 1905.<br>
<br>
2.) If the photon is seen as the ingredient of the electron, we need a much clearer definition and understanding what the photon is and what its effects are in detail (like the wave front emitted). Otherwise there are too many insufficiently defined situations as visible in the discussion further down. - And clearly we do not get any help from quantum mechanics for this, after Heisenberg has stated that it is completely useless to look into an elementary particle, and the physical community has accepted this since that time.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a ymailto="mailto:eric@unquantum.net" href="mailto:eric@unquantum.net">eric@unquantum.net</a><br><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/eric%40unquantum.net?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/eric%40unquantum.net?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div></body></html>