<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hi Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>See below:</div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 14:56 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <genmail@a-giese.de><br/>
<b>An:</b> af.kracklauer@web.de, general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org<br/>
<b>Cc:</b> "Richard Gauthier" <richgauthier@gmail.com>, "Joakim Pettersson" <joakimbits@gmail.com>, "Ariane Mandray" <ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] research papers</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255,255,255);">
<div>Hi Al,<br/>
<br/>
thank you for the reference to your paper. I think that it is an interesting contribution. However I need some more details in order to fully and correctly understand it.<br/>
<br/>
1.) Is it correct that your deduction of the de Broglie wavelength is based on the understanding that there exists a background of EM-waves? And that it needs this understanding?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Al: Yes, but I do not see that as an ontological fact as much as a convenient summary of the totality of interactions with the remaining charges in the universe. (Maybe you've picked up by now that at a fundamental level I do not accept the concepts of "photon" or "E&M" as valid final discriptions or models for the totality of all possible gaussian (1/r^2) WITH DELAY between ALL extant charges. Photons and E&M waves are approximations, albeit very useful ones.) If one choses to live with this assumtion, i.e., the existence of this background, which is, BTW, identical with that deduced from QM. as it stands, then the energy density at each point in space divergerges, just like "2nd QM "quantum vacuum"! To get around this objection I have some ideas, still a bit raw and unwritten up.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><br/>
2.) The sequence of your equations (1) to (4) is too compact for me to make it understandable, missing e.g. a definition of k<sub>0</sub>. Any chance to have it more detailed?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Al: Don't over interpret it, just redo it yourself with whatever notation you like. The description is meant to be definitive. The math is atmospherics for the paper. But, k_0 = omega_0/c where the omega is for the resonant wave in the particles rest frame. It turns out, as argued lower in the paper, this does not really matter which omega, or how many (e.g., multipole interaction, etc.), even an infinite number (point charge), they all get modualted by the deBroglie wave. Again, this is the final, average effect, not an ontologically precise deal. QM, after all, is about averages, relabeled "expectations." Thinking otherwise leadds to endless logic-traps.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Al: Hope this helps, best Al<br/>
<br/>
Thanks and best regards<br/>
Albrecht<br/>
<br/>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 27.10.2015 um 16:11 schrieb <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="af.kracklauer@web.de" target="_parent">af.kracklauer@web.de</a>:</div>
<blockquote>
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>Hi All:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>In paper No. 11 on <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com" target="_blank">www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com</a> I published some ideas on the origin and nanture of deBroglie waves. Seems to me some of the objections and obscurities mentioned below are delt with therein. Take a look, see what you think. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, Al</div>
<div>
<div style="margin: 10.0px 5.0px 5.0px 10.0px;padding: 10.0px 0 10.0px 10.0px;border-left: 2.0px solid rgb(195,217,229);">
<div style="margin: 0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2015 um 15:39 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Dr. Albrecht Giese" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="genmail@a-giese.de" target="_parent"><genmail@a-giese.de></a><br/>
<b>An:</b> "Richard Gauthier" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="richgauthier@gmail.com" target="_parent"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a><br/>
<b>Cc:</b> "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_parent"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a>, "Joakim Pettersson" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="joakimbits@gmail.com" target="_parent"><joakimbits@gmail.com></a>, "Ariane Mandray" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr" target="_parent"><ariane.mandray@wanadoo.fr></a><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] research papers</div>
<div>
<div style="background-color: rgb(255,255,255);">Hello Richard (and all),<br/>
<br/>
thank you, Richard, for your informations. You find my answers and comments in your text.<br/>
<br/>
However I see here two general problems which should be reviewed by all.<br/>
<br/>
1.) The fact that the de Broglie wave regarding its definition and its use is <i>not </i>Lorentz-invariant. So it is incompatible with our physical understanding since 1905.<br/>
<br/>
2.) If the photon is seen as the ingredient of the electron, we need a much clearer definition and understanding what the photon is and what its effects are in detail (like the wave front emitted). Otherwise there are too many insufficiently defined situations as visible in the discussion further down. - And clearly we do not get any help from quantum mechanics for this, after Heisenberg has stated that it is completely useless to look into an elementary particle, and the physical community has accepted this since that time.<br/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br/>
<br/>
<hr style="border: none;color: rgb(144,144,144);background-color: rgb(176,176,176);height: 1.0px;width: 99.0%;"/>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse;border: none;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: none;padding: 0.0px 15.0px 0.0px 8.0px;"><a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank"><img alt="Avast logo" border="0" src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png"/> </a></td>
<td>
<p style="color: rgb(61,77,90);font-family: Calibri , Verdana , Arial , Helvetica;font-size: 12.0pt;">Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.<br/>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" target="_blank">www.avast.com</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>