<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"> <br><span style="font-size:7pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)">Dear John W.,</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)">You made a comment:</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)"> </span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0in 0in 6.75pt 0.5in;line-height:normal;background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(51,102,255)">"Agreed.
There is a lot of numerology bullshit out there. Please note, I’m not primarily
about numbers, but about a new set of differential equations with new
solutions."</span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:rgb(34,34,34)"></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">You’ve also
taken some shots at the Dirac equations. This ‘old’ set of equations has a
solution for the H atom that is absolutely rejected by the PTB, because it is
singular at the origin. The mathematical physicists, who have rejected the
‘anomalous’ solution for 55 years (or more), apparently believe in point
charges and have no knowledge of nuclear physics and the standard non-singular
potentials used in that field for the charge affects within the nucleus. Physics
could be quite different today had the consequences of this solution been
explored.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><br></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Today, it is not possible to get a paper advocating this
solution published in a major physics journal (or even put into the arXiv).
Papers arguing against it <u>can</u> be published. </span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Why do you think that “</span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">a
new set of differential equations with new solutions" would fare any
better than the anomalous Dirac solution? May be it would take an engineering
journal to break the news!</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><br></span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Andrew</span><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""></span></p>

</div>