<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Dear Wolf: <o:p>
</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">You are correct that I have not presented my logic in sufficient details to make my assertion that the Cosmological Redshift is definitely not a Doppler Phenomenon. I have to think through
more and make secondary paper substantiate further. I need more time.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">I am actually inspired Nobel Laureate Hubble himself. Apparently he was never satisfied with the Doppler sift explanations. I have more thinking to do.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Further, I also strongly believe that the optical Doppler shift, like Doppler shift of sound waves, have two separate effects. Source movement creates a real (permanent) frequency shift of
the quantum frequency. Then this shift can be experienced as a wide variety of frequencies by different detectors (spectrometers) moving at different velocities. This was Doppler’s original postulate with ether as the tension field. This is equivalent to stationary
air-pressure tension field for sound waves. So I need a stationary Complex Tension Field (CTF), or modified ether, to sustain the perpetual velocity of light as c (the tension properties being epsilon and mu). CTF is the cosmic inertial reference frame in
which everything is being played out. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, January 24, 2016 3:35 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] cosmological red shift<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Chandrasekhar;<br>
Reading your "could space be considered as the inertial rest frame" in the SPIE vol 9570
<br>
I would very much like to find an alternative explanation for the red shift and am interested in your absorption line argument<br>
but do not understand your logic.<br>
<br>
If a star is moving away from us both the inner and outer corona are moving at the same velocity.<br>
The inner corona atom emits light "f<sub>0</sub>'that is red shifted To "f" in the media due to its motion<br>
The outer corona atom absorbs light at frequency "f" that is blue shifted relative to its natural "f<sub>0</sub>' frequency because it is moving toward the source<br>
This leaves a hole in the spectra in the media at "f" red shifted<br>
An atom on earth is not moving toward the source and therefore the arriving light will still be at red shift frequency "f"
<br>
atoms on the earth with natural "f<sub>0</sub>' frequency will not be able to absorb the light
<br>
<br>
All light frequencies shift and the hole at "f" is red shifted due to the motion of the star away from us.<br>
Why do you say this is not a doppler effect?<br>
<br>
I would like to find a gravitational argument rather than a Doppler argument fro the red shift, but do not understand how your argument works.<br>
What am I doing Wrong?<br>
<br>
Wolf<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Research Director<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre>E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>