<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.js-non-expanded-comment
{mso-style-name:js-non-expanded-comment;}
span.js-expanded-comment
{mso-style-name:js-expanded-comment;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:2007631952;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1132770232 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Hello John D. and Everybody:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><![if !supportLists]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">No Stationary Waves; only “stationary nodes and antinodes:</span></i></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"> It may sound only as semantics; but I think it is
important to differentiate between “standing nodes and anti-nodes” vs. “standing waves”. By mathematical structure of the wave equation (equating second derivative of time and space-tension-property), the oscillating tension values always moves away spatially.
So, <b><i>waves by, definition, cannot ever be stationary</i></b>, even when multiple waves are propagating through the same space. This NIW, Non-Interaction of Waves. This is the key reason that Maxwell’s wave equation can accept LINEAR summation of any linear
harmonic waves. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"> But, within the volume of superposition spatially stationary superposition patterns arises, depending upon the Poynting vectors of the propagating superposed waves. When they are
of exactly same frequency and only two opposite going waves, can sense STATIONARY nodes and antinodes, orthogonal to the common and parallel Poynting vectors (180-degree opposite going). When TWO Poynting vectors are at some angle, and again the wave frequencies
are identical, we can again sense stationary nodes and antinodes patterns; this time bisecting the angle between the two Poynting vectors. For multiple beams at multiple angles, the patterns are complex but easily modeled by math.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"> So, my neural logic system gets deeply confused when I try to imagine “Stationary Waves”, rather than
<b><i>“Stationary Nodes and Antinodes”</i></b>.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph" style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><![if !supportLists]><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><![endif]><b><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">“Electrons as Modified Photons”:</span></i></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"> Again, it may be interpreted as merely semantics; but to me, it is confusing.
Perpetually propagating photons are classical wave packets, even though, at the emission, the energy content has been quantized due to quantized energy levels of the emitting atom. Emission is quantized; but not the propagation. Once the energy is released,
it evolves as diffractively spreading and perpetually propagating wave. QM has never succeeded in constructing any equation better than that of Huygens-Fresnel integral to propagate light. A “photon” is just a propagating “wave packet”, and an excited state
of the CTF (or ether). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"><b><i><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"> </span></i></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">When our group finally succeeds in making a model of an electron as a self-looped and localized oscillation
of the same CTF; it should not be described as a different form of photon. Then we will keep on looking for “photon” properties in the new electron. This self-looped oscillation is some excitation of the same CTF, correct; but it has nothing to do with “photon”;
the energy can be supplied in many different forms. An electron is a novel localized, non-propagating oscillation of the same CTF. Gamma-Gamma interaction, facilitated by heavy nucleons, does generate electron-positron pair; but, I do not visualize them as
photons getting converted into “localized” particles with “inertia” (mass). Gamma energies has been re-constructed into particles, facilitated by the heavy nucleon. Further, QM has never succeeded in localizing a “photon”. QM definition of “photon” as a Fourier
mode of the vacuum. This is an outright violation of causality since Fourier modes are non-causal.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:windowtext">PS: Dear Wolfgang Baer: I still owe you further explanation on my view of Doppler Effect. Both the source velocity and the detector velocity are experimentally discernible, as was original
perceived by Doppler himself. This point of view is re-validated by analyzing the stimulated emission as the response of a moving.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>John Duffield<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:04 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> {SPAM?} Re: [General] (no subject)<br>
<b>Importance:</b> Low<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Wolf:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Take a field variation and wrap it round a spin-½ path, and what you then have is a standing field. A charged particle. It doesn’t blow apart because light is displacement
current, and displacement current does what it says on the can. Light displaces its own path into a closed path. IMHO pair production and the wave nature of matter should have made all this common knowledge a long time ago. In atomic orbitals electrons
</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital#Electron_properties"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">exist as standing waves</span></a><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">. Kick
an electron out of an orbital, and it still exists as a standing wave. Standing wave, standing field. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">John D<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext">]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Wolfgang Baer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 26 January 2016 22:40<br>
<b>To:</b> </span><a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext"><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span lang="EN-GB">Albrecht:</span></b><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
I figured you would say something like this. But this group has published several intriguing papers ( W. F. Hagen) that suggest light
<br>
( won't say photons) curled up in cycles or tourus like shapes can become the basis of matter and explain various elementary particles.<br>
<br>
There is something elegant and intriguing about these conjectures. <br>
However both the charge repulsion and the centripetal forces that tend to blow things apart need to be explained in these efforts.<br>
The QM explanations, as I understand them, simply describe what must be so. Dirac's eq. does not answer how charge hangs together<br>
or what contracts gravitational spin energy induced centrifugal forces. <br>
<br>
Are you saying this entire category of explanation should be ( has already been) discarded in favor of your strong force model?<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Wolf<br>
<br>
<b>Chandrasekhar;</b><br>
Reading your "could space be considered as the inertial rest frame" in the SPIE vol 9570
<br>
I would very much like to find an alternative explanation for the red shift and am interested in your absorption line argument<br>
but do not understand your logic.<br>
<br>
If a star is moving away from us both the inner and outer corona are moving at the same velocity.<br>
The inner corona atom emits light "f<sub>0</sub>'that is red shifted To "f" in the media due to its motion<br>
The outer corona atom absorbs light at frequency "f" that is blue shifted relative to its natural "f<sub>0</sub>' frequency because it is moving toward the source<br>
This leaves a hole in the spectra in the media at "f" red shifted<br>
An atom on earth is not moving toward the source and therefore the arriving light will still be at red shift frequency "f"
<br>
atoms on the earth with natural "f<sub>0</sub>' frequency will not be able to absorb the light
<br>
<br>
All light frequencies shift and the hole at "f" is red shifted due to the motion of the star away from us.<br>
Why do you say this is not a Doppler effect?<br>
<br>
I would like to find a gravitational argument rather than a Doppler argument for the red shift, but do not understand how your argument works.<br>
What am I doing Wrong?<br>
<br>
best again,<br>
Wolf<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Research Director<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">E-mail </span><a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com"><span lang="EN-GB">wolf@NascentInc.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On 1/26/2016 1:36 PM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi Wolf!<br>
<br>
The famous equation E=mc^2 is in my understanding one of the mystifications in physics created in the last century. Einstein did it in a very drastic way: according to him E and m are two symbols for the same physical phenomenon. Here I strictly disagree. Look
to the definitions of mass and energy, they are definitely different. If one has a working model for elementary particles, this relation results as a
<i>relation </i>(nothing more) originating in the internal structure of an elementary particle.<br>
<br>
You see a problem with the electron regarding the repelling force and the centrifugal force in an electron. Since the 1930s well known physicists have tried to explain the electron classically on the basis of the electric force. Their model failed all. So the
conclusion was (written in text books) that the electron cannot be understood but only mathematically treated by QM.
<br>
<br>
In my model I have gone another way by assuming that the essential force in any elementary particle is the strong force. The strong force is composed in the particle by positive and negative "charges". With this assumption the electron can be calculated (like
the other leptons and also quarks) with very precise results. Particularly the centrifugal force is not a point as the internal parts in an elementary particle are mass-less. And the electron looks neutral from the outside regarding the strong force.
<br>
<br>
Albrecht<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Am 25.01.2016 um 20:44 schrieb Wolfgang Baer:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB">Does this not all start with the E=mc^2 energy mass equivalence postulate?<br>
A moving photon has energy therefore mass , if the wave is confined to a circular path the mass could be considered stationary<br>
The equations can all be manipulated to come up with various quantities and interpretations.<br>
<br>
What to me is problematic is the centrifugal forces. What balances the tremendous outward pull?<br>
An electron only has charge that repels, and now centrifugal forces, what holds it all together?<br>
<br>
Wolf<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Research Director<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">E-mail </span><a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com"><span lang="EN-GB">wolf@NascentInc.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On 1/25/2016 8:33 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB">Dear Richard,<br>
<br>
you know that I object to your derivation of inertial mass. You deduce it from momentum. That is mathematically possible by using the known relations. But it is not logical in so far as momentum depends on inertia. In a world without inertia there would be
no momentum.<br>
<br>
So we have to explain first the mechanism of inertia itself, then we can derive the momentum and the inertial mass.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
Albrecht<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Am 24.01.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Richard Gauthier:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hello Vladimir and Chandra and all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> Yes, I definitely support the idea of the ether as material space, and that all physical particles are derived from this ether. This ether can also be called a plenum or Cosmic Tension Field.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> I don’t however think that it is necessary to explain the inertial mass of particles in relation to a "coefficient of inertia” or "the amount of momentum the ether resists." I have shown (</span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia"><span lang="EN-GB">https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"> )
by a very simple derivation that the inertial mass m of an electron may be derived from the momentum of the circling photon in a circulating-photon model of the electron, whose circling photon has momentum mc where m = Eo/c^2 = hf/c^2 , where Eo is the rest
energy 0.511 MeV of the electron and f is the frequency of the circulating photon in the resting electron. Secondly, in a similar way I derived a linearly moving photon's inertial mass to be M-inertial = hf/c^2 , where f is the photon’s frequency, even though
a photon has zero rest mass. Thirdly, I derived the inertial mass of a relativistic electron, whose momentum is p=gamma mv, to be M-inertial = gamma m , even though the moving electron's rest mass is m. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> I present these derivations below, taken from the </span><a href="http://academia.edu"><span lang="EN-GB">academia.edu</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"> session on my electron inertia article at </span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/s/a26afd55e0?source=link"><span lang="EN-GB">https://www.academia.edu/s/a26afd55e0?source=link</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"> :<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="js-non-expanded-comment"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#494848">"One reason people don’t think that a photon has any inertial mass (because it has no rest mass) is that how do
you get a photon to change its momentum (i.e. accelerate) in order to measure its inertial mass. It can’t go faster or slower than c in a vacuum, so it can’t accelerate in a linear direction, and in normal physics a photon doesn’t follow a curved path (except
with gravity), which would make it possible to measure its centripetal acceleration c^2/R . But as I showed in my short el</span></span><span class="js-expanded-comment"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#494848">ectron
inertia article at </span></span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin%20_o%0A%20f_%0A%252%0A0th%0A%252%0A0e_Elect%0A%0Arons_Inertia"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif"">https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia</span></a><span class="js-expanded-comment"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#494848">
<span lang="EN-GB">, the electron model in a resting electron has the photon going in a circle, with momentum mc and speed c, and the electron's inertial mass is then calculated to be M-inertial =(dp/dt)/Acentrifugal =wmc/(c^2/r)= m which is the inertial mass
of the electron. But this calculation of the circling charged photon's inertial mass is independent of the radius of the charged photon’s circular orbit. Let that circular radius go towards infinity and you get a photon traveling in essentially a straight
line, still having its inertial mass M =hf/c^2 (where the photon frequency f decreases as the radius of the circle increases) . So according to this logic, a linearly moving photon DOES have inertial mass M-inertial =hf/c^2 even though a photon has zero rest
mass. And when a relativistic electron with momentum p=gamma mv travels in a circle with speed v, th e inerti al mass cal cul ation ab ove gives M -in ertial = gamma m for a circling relativistic electron, and not just m the electron’s rest mass . Extending
the radius here towards infinity also gives a linearly moving electron an inertial mass M = gamma m and not just the electron's rest mass m."</span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="js-expanded-comment"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""> As far as I know these are all original derivations of the inertial mass of a resting electron, a photon and a relativistic
electron based on a circulating photon model of an electron. I would be pleased to be shown otherwise.</span></span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="js-expanded-comment"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""> Richard</span></span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On Jan 24, 2016, at 6:42 AM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra <</span><a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"><span lang="EN-GB">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt">Yes, Vlad, that is also my viewpoint.</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt">I do not remember whether I have attached this paper while communicating with you earlier. I call the “plenum” Cosmic Tension Field (CTF), to be descriptive in its essential properties.</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt">Chandra.</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">General
[</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Vladimir Tamari<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:00 PM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [General] (no subject)</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi Richard <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">I barge into your discussion without knowing your views on a "plenum field" but if it is an ether I definitely think there is one. A "coefficent of inertia" might be defined as the amount of momentum the ether resists.
In a charged or gravitational field this coefficent would increase...I think of this in terms of my Beautiful Universe ether of dielectric nodes, except this may give the wrong idea it is something matter wades in.. not so. Matter and ether are made if the
selfsame nodes of energy!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Vladimir<br>
<br>
_____________________<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://vladimirtamari.com/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:purple">vladimirtamari.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
On Jan 21, 2016, at 7:41 AM, Richard Gauthier <</span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang="EN-GB">richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Hi Hodge,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> I don’t remember asking that. But if I did, I’m glad the question was helpful.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> I’m thinking about inertia these days. Do you or others have any insights about its nature?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> Richard<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">On Jan 20, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Hodge John <</span><a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com"><span lang="EN-GB">jchodge@frontier.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2533">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Richard Gauthier:</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2535">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">You asked if the galaxy redshift, Pioneer anomaly, Pound--Rebka experiment model had a velocity term. I looked at redshift data for 1 galaxy and found
no indication of a velocity term.</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2537">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""> </span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2539">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">I had not noticed this in the equations. Your suggestion that the plenum field can look like the Higgs field seems valid. That is, the acceleration
of the plenum field looks like it adds energy (mass) is a Higgs Field characteristic. Thus, the plenum is closer to the idea of a quantum field and Higgs field (weak force).</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2541">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""> </span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2543">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">Thanks for the insight.</span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2545">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""> </span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2579">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span lang="EN-GB">Hodge<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang="EN-GB">richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:purple">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at</span><a href="mailto:vladimirtamari@hotmail.com"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:purple">vladimirtamari@hotmail.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color:purple">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><2012.2_JMP_Space as real field.pdf></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang="EN-GB">richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif""><br>
<a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"">"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a></span><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de"><span lang="EN-GB">phys@a-giese.de</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0" style="border:none;border-top:solid #AAABB6 1.0pt">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="131" style="width:78.75pt;border:none;padding:11.25pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:22.5pt"><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="40" height="40" id="_x0000_i1026" src="cid:image001.png@01D1591B.D5CBFE40" alt="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png"></span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td width="588" style="width:352.5pt;border:none;padding:15.0pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:22.5pt;line-height:13.5pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#41424E">Diese E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird.
<br>
</span><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#4453EA">www.avast.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#41424E">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com"><span lang="EN-GB">Wolf@nascentinc.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de"><span lang="EN-GB">phys@a-giese.de</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0" style="border:none;border-top:solid #AAABB6 1.0pt">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="131" style="width:78.75pt;border:none;padding:11.25pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:22.5pt"><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="40" height="40" id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image002.png@01D1591B.D5CBFE40" alt="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png"></span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td width="588" style="width:352.5pt;border:none;padding:15.0pt .75pt .75pt .75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:22.5pt;line-height:13.5pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#41424E">Diese E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird.
<br>
</span><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#4453EA">www.avast.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#41424E">
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span lang="EN-GB"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com"><span lang="EN-GB">Wolf@nascentinc.com</span></a><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang="EN-GB">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB">Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span lang="EN-GB"></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>