<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.js-non-expanded-comment
{mso-style-name:js-non-expanded-comment;}
span.js-expanded-comment
{mso-style-name:js-expanded-comment;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle27
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle28
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1037" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Hi John<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I did some crude calculations regarding the self-confinement of waves to form fermions.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Some of that work is included here…<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>We can calculate the force of wave diffraction in space which could cause gravity, and check to see if this can cause the force of diffraction of the wave in the electron to provide for complete self-confinement.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>The force of gravity can be expressed as: </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r><m:r>=</m:r><m:r>G</m:r><m:r>(</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>m</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>m</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup></m:den></m:f><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>)</m:r></span></i></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=103 height=30 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image001.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> then when mass is expressed in terms of energy this is equivalent to:</span><span style='font-size:14.0pt'> </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r><m:r>=</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>G</m:r></span></i></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>c</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>4</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup></m:den></m:f></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=75 height=32 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image002.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> where F is force, E is energy, G is the gravitational constant, c is the speed of light, and d is distance. Now we can split the force terms so that: </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>=</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><m:rad><m:radPr><m:degHide m:val="on"/><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:radPr><m:deg></m:deg><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>G</m:r></span></i></m:e></m:rad></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>c</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:den></m:f></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=77 height=36 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image003.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:14.0pt'> </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>=</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><m:rad><m:radPr><m:degHide m:val="on"/><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:radPr><m:deg></m:deg><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>G</m:r></span></i></m:e></m:rad></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>c</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:den></m:f></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=77 height=36 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image004.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> ??? Where </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:3.0pt;mso-text-raise:-3.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=16 height=19 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image005.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>is the force exerted by the first object on the second object and </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:3.0pt;mso-text-raise:-3.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=16 height=19 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image006.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>is the force exerted by the second object on the first object.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>If we assume that fermionic particles, being particles which make up massive objects, are confined waves of energy, circulating at c, then gravitational mass would be caused by the diffraction of these waves toward a massive object.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>One avenue we can explore is the force of diffraction of waves caused by a concentration of energy. We can see if this diffraction force could possibly be sufficient to cause the self-confinement of waves to form fermionic particles.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>For that exploration we would need to compute the force these confined waves would have on themselves.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>We can estimate that this force would be </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>s</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>=</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>G</m:r></span></i></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>c</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup></m:den></m:f></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=70 height=32 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image007.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]> <b><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>using the theorized transport radius for our distance term.</span></i></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>But this tells us that self-diffraction is too weak a force to hold these fermionic particles together, we actually need a force about 2.6E+14 stronger. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>However there is a catch. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>Portions of these confined waves may be (probably are) actually overlapping, reducing the distance term dramatically </span></i></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>in the equation </span><!--[if gte msEquation 12]><m:oMath><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>F</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>s</m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>=</m:r></span></i><m:f><m:fPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:fPr><m:num><m:sSub><m:sSubPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSubPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>E</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>1 </m:r></span></i></m:sub></m:sSub><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>G</m:r></span></i></m:num><m:den><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>c</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup><m:sSup><m:sSupPr><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif;font-style:italic'><m:ctrlPr></m:ctrlPr></span></m:sSupPr><m:e><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>d</m:r></span></i></m:e><m:sup><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'><m:r>2</m:r></span></i></m:sup></m:sSup></m:den></m:f></m:oMath><![endif]--><![if !msEquation]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;position:relative;top:7.5pt;mso-text-raise:-7.5pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><img width=70 height=32 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image007.png@01D15FF2.E07121D0"></span><![endif]><span style='font-size:10.0pt'> … If we find that distance term could be actually 16124973.06693 times smaller than we estimated, then we would have the exact required force for confinement. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>But so far I do not have sufficient reason to assume this distance value is the correct one for this calculation in fermionic configuration.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Duffield<br><b>Sent:</b> Saturday, January 30, 2016 11:22 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Chip:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>You’re black, I’m blue:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The constant “amplitude” concept is still a bit confusing to me because this amplitude cannot be referring to a physical displacement distance. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>When an ocean wave moves through the sea, the sea waves. When a seismic wave move through the ground, the ground waves. Maxwell referred to transverse undulations, LIGO is looking for a length change in the interferometer arms, and I just can’t see why it’s any different for space. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>It seems, he does not yet really understand charge. He is close, but does not get the concept yet that charge is not formed until the wave is confined in 3 dimensions in a specific manner<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>The article isn’t perfect, but note that it’s the quantization of electromagnetic <b><i>change</i></b>, and there’s stuff like this: <i>”The electric charge constant is neutral being the curved space surrounding the electric amplitude in the positive and negative direction of space, in each half cycle of the photon”. <o:p></o:p></i></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>simply because it is the divergence of the E field in this topological 3 dimensional confinement with the spin ½ rate which creates the conditions for what we sense as charge. So a photon cannot possess the property of charge in any manner. It simply possesses the E field.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>It doesn’t even possess the E field. The photon is an electromagnetic field variation. E and B are the spatial and time derivatives of potential. Something like this: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><img width=634 height=288 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:image024.gif@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>There’s curved space on both sides of it, but the curvature nets to zero. As for the amplitude thing, I am reminded of a guitar string. The frequency varies as you move your left hand up and down the frets. But the amplitude of your pluck doesn’t. A charged particle is where there’s a none-zero curvature. Like you grab the lattice with your right hand and twist it round, then reach round from the side with your left hand and twist it round orthogonally, then let go and it stays “knotted”. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Yes. I considered the single photon as purely a transverse wave as well. But several factors are worth considering. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>QM has the basic photon with a spin of ħ. Simply because all the spin math works out if this is the case.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Don’t forget that there’s angular momentum in a transverse wave. See the motion of the red dots in <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Deep_water_wave.gif">this wind wave gif</a>. But I don’t have a strong view on what type of wave a photon is. What I’d like to see is two waves in a lattice interacting such that each is displaced into itself, and that each then continues to forever displace its own path into a closed path. Whatever type of wave does that will do for me. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>If the photon is a spinning (spiraling) dipole corkscrew, then the neutrino could simply be a spiraling quadrupole. This would make it much more neutral and less reactive with all other particles (which are principally dipole based). Neutrino data, at first look, seems to support this premise.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Maybe. Again whatever type of wave exhibits the right behaviour will do for me. Meanwhile, if you’ve got a washing line, sight your eye down it, and twang it. Then get a pair of pliers and twist it, then let go. </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Representing the photon as a spiraling dipole answers so many questions and ties so many of the puzzle pieces together that it seems worth exploring. <i>Even if this spin and confinement effect does not present strongly until we get into the gamma region, it still seems worth exploring.</i> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Explore everything. </span><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>JohnD <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [<a href="mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Chip Akins<br><b>Sent:</b> 27 January 2016 15:09<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Hi John D<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Your comments have a way of really cutting through to the practical. I appreciate your thoughts immensely.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Regarding:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>But whatever it is, there’s surely some kind of confinement going on. Photons don’t dissipate, and that h isn’t there for nothing. And when a 511keV photon ends up confined in three dimensions, we don’t call it a photon any more. We call it an electron. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Yes. So I am exploring the possibility that energy is always confined in at least 2 dimensions, and for fermions, 3 dimensions.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Thank you for the Kemp reference. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_s1036" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:61.95pt;margin-top:8.7pt;width:74.25pt;height:48pt;z-index:-251648000;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image025.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895815168;margin-left:83px;margin-top:12px;width:99px;height:64px'><img width=99 height=64 src="cid:image025.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_1"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>His formula <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Is pretty interesting. Will take a look at this in more detail.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The constant “amplitude” concept is still a bit confusing to me because this amplitude cannot be referring to a physical displacement distance. I think it must be referring to the formula above which is in his words the “saturation constant”.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>It seems, he does not yet really understand charge. He is close, but does not get the concept yet that charge is not formed until the wave is confined in 3 dimensions in a specific manner, simply because it is the divergence of the E field in this topological 3 dimensional confinement with the spin ½ rate which creates the conditions for what we sense as charge. So a photon cannot possess the property of charge in any manner. It simply possesses the E field.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Yes. I considered the single photon as purely a transverse wave as well. But several factors are worth considering. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>QM has the basic photon with a spin of ħ. Simply because all the spin math works out if this is the case.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I have considered the neutrality of the neutrino and some of the possibilities.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>If the photon is a spinning (spiraling) dipole corkscrew, then the neutrino could simply be a spiraling quadrupole. This would make it much more neutral and less reactive with all other particles (which are principally dipole based).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Neutrino data, at first look, seems to support this premise.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Representing the photon as a spiraling dipole answers so many questions and ties so many of the puzzle pieces together that it seems worth exploring. <i>Even if this spin and confinement effect does not present strongly until we get into the gamma region, it still seems worth exploring.</i> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Due to the NIW principal with photons (superposition), we can realize any sensed polarization from gross EM radiation and still maintain the individual photon spin.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Duffield<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:39 PM<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Chip:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>What you said below sounds promising. I’m not sure about the photon being a rotational wave though. I think of the neutrino as being the rotational wave and the photon as the transverse wave. If you haven’t already, have a look at this: <a href="http://photontheory.com/Kemp/Kemp.html">http://photontheory.com/Kemp/Kemp.html</a>. As ever it all comes back to <a href="http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2441825">What is a photon?</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>But whatever it is, there’s surely some kind of confinement going on. Photons don’t dissipate, and that h isn’t there for nothing. And when a 511keV photon ends up confined in three dimensions, we don’t call it a photon any more. We call it an electron. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>John D<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><img border=0 width=1366 height=768 id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image026.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0"></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [<a href="mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Chip Akins<br><b>Sent:</b> 26 January 2016 15:17<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Greetings All<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>We have all spent years working on this puzzle. Each of us has formed opinion about how it must work.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>For my part, that understanding has grown I hope, and meanwhile my opinion has developed and changed with each new understanding, each new connecting of the dots.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>At this point I would like to summarize what I believe explains some of what we observe.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Opinion follows:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Light is propagating waves in the medium of space. Space is a medium with a specific set of properties, very similar to an elastic solid.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>In my opinion light is quantized in a manner. I think light is a wave, but a rotational wave. That is to say light is a wave which rotates as it moves forward. The rotation of light, its spin angular momentum, has the requirement of a sort of confinement of the wave. This is a sort of weak quantization of light. This is, in my opinion, why we see “photonic” behavior of light is some circumstances. Because spin angular momentum requires an effective spin radius, and making the wave travel in that “corkscrew” fashion requires a confinement force acting on the wave.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>To state this in different words, we know that light has forward momentum, and that spin angular momentum requires an effective radius of spin. In order for light to display spin angular momentum there then must be a centripetal force confining the wave to provide for spin. Since E=hv we can suggest that the effective radius of spin is the wavelength divided by 2π. Since the spin angular momentum is ħ we can calculate this radius and force for any given energy level. We can then see why gamma radiation is much more confined than radiation of lower frequencies (energy levels).<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>And again, if we analyze these issues for a gamma photon which the energy level of the electron we have the following:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>E=8.1871E-14 J.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><img border=0 width=45 height=35 id="Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:image027.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0"><span style='color:black'>= 2.7309E-22 where p is longitudinal momentum.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><img border=0 width=48 height=47 id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image028.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0"><span style='color:black'>= 1.2356E20 Hz where f is frequency.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><img border=0 width=60 height=45 id="Picture_x0020_4" src="cid:image029.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0"><span style='color:black'>= 2.4263E-12 m where λ is wavelength.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_5" o:spid="_x0000_s1027" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:258.55pt;margin-top:4.95pt;width:152.25pt;height:28.5pt;z-index:-251658240;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image030.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895825408;margin-left:345px;margin-top:7px;width:203px;height:38px'><img width=203 height=38 src="cid:image030.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_5"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>That makes the effective spin radius of this photon: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_6" o:spid="_x0000_s1028" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:245.4pt;margin-top:6.2pt;width:214.5pt;height:29.25pt;z-index:-251657216;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image031.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895824384;margin-left:327px;margin-top:8px;width:286px;height:39px'><img width=286 height=39 src="cid:image031.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_6"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>And the calculated angular momentum would be: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_7" o:spid="_x0000_s1029" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:410.05pt;margin-top:4.3pt;width:176.25pt;height:32.25pt;z-index:-251656192;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image032.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895823360;margin-left:547px;margin-top:6px;width:235px;height:43px'><img width=235 height=43 src="cid:image032.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_7"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>So then the calculated centripetal spin confinement force for this photon would be: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>If this is actually how photons are confined then we have an explanation for the binding force, the centripetal force, which holds the electron together as well. But we will get to that in a moment.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>This force is of exactly the same magnitude as the Strong Nuclear force. Let’s take a look at that once more.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_8" o:spid="_x0000_s1030" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:373.75pt;margin-top:1.25pt;width:281.25pt;height:39.75pt;z-index:-251655168;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image033.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895822336;margin-left:498px;margin-top:2px;width:375px;height:53px'><img width=375 height=53 src="cid:image033.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_8"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>First let us calculate the electrical force one would experience at this radius:</span> <span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_9" o:spid="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:379.35pt;margin-top:6.25pt;width:250.5pt;height:39pt;z-index:-251659265;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image034.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895826433;margin-left:506px;margin-top:8px;width:334px;height:52px'><img width=334 height=52 src="cid:image034.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_9"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Now let us compare the centripetal force we calculated to the electrical force: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The difference between the strength of the electrical force and this force F<sub>c </sub>is equal to the fine structure constant α.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>After these considerations I am coming to the opinion that there is a binding force F<sub>c</sub> which acts on all wave energy propagating through space, which causes light to have a “soft” quantization and matter (fermions) to have a “hard” quantization, and provides for the creation (confinement) of all particles.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:14.0pt;color:black'>The difference between this force F<sub>c</sub> and the electrical force, causes the fine structure constant which is so prevalent in nature.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Now we can look at the action of this force as it applies to the electron:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The electron has a spin angular momentum of ½ ħ. So since we know the longitudinal momentum of the confined photon we can calculate the effective confinement radius of the electron and check to see if our spin angular momentum is correct.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_10" o:spid="_x0000_s1031" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:173.35pt;margin-top:3.05pt;width:153pt;height:31.5pt;z-index:-251654144;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image035.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895821312;margin-left:231px;margin-top:4px;width:204px;height:42px'><img width=204 height=42 src="cid:image035.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_10"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Electron effective transport radius: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_11" o:spid="_x0000_s1032" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:235.4pt;margin-top:11.85pt;width:4in;height:40.5pt;z-index:-251653120;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image036.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895820288;margin-left:314px;margin-top:16px;width:384px;height:54px'><img width=384 height=54 src="cid:image036.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_11"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Now we calculate the spin angular momentum:</span> <span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_13" o:spid="_x0000_s1033" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:317.4pt;margin-top:11.2pt;width:207pt;height:47.25pt;z-index:-251652096;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image037.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895819264;margin-left:423px;margin-top:15px;width:276px;height:63px'><img width=276 height=63 src="cid:image037.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_13"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>So the confinement (centripetal) force for the electron would be:</span> <span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_14" o:spid="_x0000_s1034" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:440.7pt;margin-top:2.5pt;width:72.75pt;height:52.5pt;z-index:-251651072;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image038.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895818240;margin-left:588px;margin-top:3px;width:97px;height:70px'><img width=97 height=70 src="cid:image038.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_14"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Note that this confinement (centripetal) force for the electron is simply related to 1/r: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_15" o:spid="_x0000_s1035" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:288.6pt;margin-top:9.35pt;width:60pt;height:51pt;z-index:-251650048;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:page;mso-height-relative:page'>
<v:imagedata src="cid:image039.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" o:title="" />
</v:shape><![endif]--><![if !vml]><span style='mso-ignore:vglayout;position:absolute;z-index:-1895817216;margin-left:385px;margin-top:12px;width:80px;height:68px'><img width=80 height=68 src="cid:image039.png@01D15FF2.E03B1DB0" v:shapes="Picture_x0020_15"></span><![endif]><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Also note that this force is always equal to Energy/radius:</span> <span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Radius r must then be constrained for some reason to be one of two values: λ/2π for light speed particles or λ/4π for fermionic particles.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>If these assumptions are correct then this force is a 1/r force instead of a 1/r<sup>2</sup> force.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>It seems this approach yields solutions to rotational waves which are in agreement with Dirac’s wave functions when expressed in three dimensions. (Dirac bispinor)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Still much to do, but for me it seems the pieces are coming together.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [<a href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Duffield<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:24 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion' <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>>; 'Roychoudhuri, Chandra' <<a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu">chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>I think it’s very simple: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Photon momentum is resistance to change-in-motion for a wave propagating linearly at c. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Electron mass is resistance to change-in-motion for a wave going round and round at c. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>See </span><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06478"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06478</span></a><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>. Catch a photon in a mirror-box, and you increases the inertia of that system. The electron is like a photon in a box of its own making. . <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>JohnD <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>mailto:general-bounces+johnduffield=btconnect.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Richard Gauthier<br><b>Sent:</b> 26 January 2016 02:12<br><b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <</span><a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>>; Roychoudhuri, Chandra <</span><a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] (no subject)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB>Chandra and all,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB> I think it has been historically misleading to define inertia as a “resistance” to acceleration. There is no known innate force or mechanism of resistance to acceleration (although Isaac Newton originally defined inertia as being caused by some kind of ‘innate force’. Conservation of momentum may be the best explanation for inertia. The more momentum something has, the larger the force required to accelerate it. Why momentum is conserved is a deeper topic. If you google “difference between inertia and momentum” you’ll find a lot of confusion between inertia and momentum, probably because the concepts seem closely related.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB> According to the Wikipedia article : “inertia”<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#252525;background:white'> In fact, Newton originally viewed the phenomenon he described in his First Law of Motion as being caused by "innate forces" inherent in matter, which resisted any acceleration. Given this perspective, and borrowing from Kepler, Newton actually attributed the term "inertia" to mean "the innate force possessed by an object which resists changes in motion"; thus Newton defined "inertia" to mean the cause of the phenomenon, rather than the phenomenon itself. However, Newton's original ideas of "innate resistive force" were ultimately problematic for a variety of reasons, and thus most physicists no longer think in these terms. As no alternate mechanism has been readily accepted, and it is now generally accepted that there may not be one which we can know, the term "inertia" has come to mean simply the phenomenon itself, rather than any inherent mechanism. Thus, ultimately, "inertia" in modern classical physics has come to be a name for the same phenomenon described by Newton's First Law of Motion, and the two concepts are now considered to be equivalent.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB>On Jan 25, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra <</span><a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"><span lang=EN-GB>chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Chip: My conjecture is this: what we call “mass” (m=E/c-squared) is the inertial behavior of the self-loped oscillations that we identify as particles. And the quantitative “inertial property” is directly proportional to the energy content, E, of the self-looped oscillation of the CTF. The inertia, of course, is its resistance to move through the CTF. We need new potential gradients in the CTF around interacting particles for them to experience “Falling into” or “be repelled by”.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'>Chandra.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span></a><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:purple'>mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>]<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>On Behalf Of<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></b>Chip Akins<br><b>Sent:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Monday, January 25, 2016 5:44 PM<br><b>To:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'<br><b>Subject:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Re: [General] (no subject)</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Hi All<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>I am looking for any thoughts or insight regarding the masses of the particles. Specifically the electron, muon, proton neutron, and tau.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Recently I have been searching for a physical explanation of why the following 4<sup>th</sup><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>order polynomial predicts these masses (Energies).<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>E = 2.16215091940284E-11n<sup>4</sup><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>- 2.57974739967757E-10n<sup>3</sup><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>+ 1.06568810515144E-09n<sup>2</sup><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>- 1.69871730871029E-09n + 8.69464305369825E-10<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:purple'>mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>]<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>On Behalf Of<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></b>Roychoudhuri, Chandra<br><b>Sent:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Monday, January 25, 2016 3:09 PM<br><b>To:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion <</span><a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:purple'>general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>><br><b>Subject:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Re: [General] (no subject)</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>Friends:<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>I am of the opinion that all waves are excited states of their respective mother tension field. They do not even carry energy. The externally perturbing energy; which disturbed the quiescent state of the tension field holding all the energy; gets perpetually pushed away by the mother tension field to regain its original state of equilibrium (quiescence). This is at the foundation of perpetual wave propagation; the velocity is being determined by the intrinsic tension properties of the tension field. This is built into our LINEAR wave equation! Linear superposition only means that within the linear domain (sum of all amplitudes) in the local tension field; all waves can co-propagate and cross-propagate away as per their original Poynting vectors without picking up any memory of their temporary co-local-propagation.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>SP, the Superposition Principle is a very smart starting-step mathematical-logic invention by humans to structure the energy exchange process with a resonant detector - as the square modulus of the sum-total complex amplitudes. Then what we measure is Superposition Effect SE. This non-linear square modulus physical OPERATION can be carried out only by some resonant detector; not by the field themselves. That is why superposed fields do not re-organize their intrinsic<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b><i>energy</i></b>; they still are propagating as various excited AMPLITUDE states of the tension field. Within the tension field, which still holds all the tension energies, they still remain dedicated to individual waves. That is why finite size waves, when emerge out of each other, do not have any memory of their earlier encounter.</span><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB>This what I have been describing as Non-Interaction of Waves (NIW).<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><b><i><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>SE is an observable phenomenon of nature; SP is not.</span></i></b><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>That is why nobody is going to make quantum computers using mathematical logic based upon SP only. If we want to build something physical; we better build that logic based upon measurable SE. God is not going to change its operating rules just because we have already invested hundreds of millions of dollars to make quantum computers based upon non-observable logics of SP (single photon interference) over the past several decades. Neither can photon have mass; just like we do not assign mass to undulation surface tension field (water waves). Yes, water itself does have inertia to motion (“mass”).<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>Chandra.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:purple'>mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>]<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>On Behalf Of<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></b>Wolfgang Baer<br><b>Sent:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Monday, January 25, 2016 2:44 PM<br><b>To:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:purple'>general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'><br><b>Subject:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Re: [General] (no subject)</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Does this not all start with the E=mc^2 energy mass equivalence postulate?<br>A moving photon has energy therefore mass , if the wave is confined to a circular path the mass could be considered stationary<br>The equations can all be manipulated to come up with various quantities and interpretations.<br><br>What to me is problematic is the centrifugal forces. What balances the tremendous outward pull?<br>An electron only has charge that repels, and now centrifugal forces, what holds it all together?<br><br>Wolf<o:p></o:p></span></p><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Dr. Wolfgang Baer<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Research Director<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Nascent Systems Inc.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>E-mail </span><a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>wolf@NascentInc.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></pre><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>On 1/25/2016 8:33 AM, Albrecht Giese wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Dear Richard,<br><br>you know that I object to your derivation of inertial mass. You deduce it from momentum. That is mathematically possible by using the known relations. But it is not logical in so far as momentum depends on inertia. In a world without inertia there would be no momentum.<br><br>So we have to explain first the mechanism of inertia itself, then we can derive the momentum and the inertial mass.<br><br>Best<br>Albrecht<o:p></o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Am 24.01.2016 um 20:42 schrieb Richard Gauthier:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Hello Vladimir and Chandra and all,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> Yes, I definitely support the idea of the ether as material space, and that all physical particles are derived from this ether. This ether can also be called a plenum or Cosmic Tension Field.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> I don’t however think that it is necessary to explain the inertial mass of particles in relation to a "coefficient of inertia” or "the amount of momentum the ether resists." I have shown (</span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia</span></a><span lang=EN-GB> ) by a very simple derivation that the inertial mass m of an electron may be derived from the momentum of the circling photon in a circulating-photon model of the electron, whose circling photon has momentum mc where m = Eo/c^2 = hf/c^2 , where Eo is the rest energy 0.511 MeV of the electron and f is the frequency of the circulating photon in the resting electron. Secondly, in a similar way I derived a linearly moving photon's inertial mass to be M-inertial = hf/c^2 , where f is the photon’s frequency, even though a photon has zero rest mass. Thirdly, I derived the inertial mass of a relativistic electron, whose momentum is p=gamma mv, to be M-inertial = gamma m , even though the moving electron's rest mass is m. <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> I present these derivations below, taken from the </span><a href="http://academia.edu/"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>academia.edu</span></a><span lang=EN-GB> session on my electron inertia article at </span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/s/a26afd55e0?source=link"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>https://www.academia.edu/s/a26afd55e0?source=link</span></a><span lang=EN-GB> :<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span class=js-non-expanded-comment><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#494848'>"One reason people don’t think that a photon has any inertial mass (because it has no rest mass) is that how do you get a photon to change its momentum (i.e. accelerate) in order to measure its inertial mass. It can’t go faster or slower than c in a vacuum, so it can’t accelerate in a linear direction, and in normal physics a photon doesn’t follow a curved path (except with gravity), which would make it possible to measure its centripetal acceleration c^2/R . But as I showed in my short el</span></span><span class=js-expanded-comment><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#494848'>ectron inertia article at</span></span><a href="https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_%20%20th%0A%20e_Elect%0A%0Arons_Inertia"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:purple'>https://www.academia.edu/19652036/The_Origin_of_the_Electrons_Inertia</span></a><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#494848'> </span></span><span class=js-expanded-comment><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Georgia",serif;color:#494848'>, the electron model in a resting electron has the photon going in a circle, with momentum mc and speed c, and the electron's inertial mass is then calculated to be M-inertial =(dp/dt)/Acentrifugal =wmc/(c^2/r)= m which is the inertial mass of the electron. But this calculation of the circling charged photon's inertial mass is independent of the radius of the charged photon’s circular orbit. Let that circular radius go towards infinity and you get a photon traveling in essentially a straight line, still having its inertial mass M =hf/c^2 (where the photon frequency f decreases as the radius of the circle increases) . So according to this logic, a linearly moving photon DOES have inertial mass M-inertial =hf/c^2 even though a photon has zero rest mass. And when a relativistic electron with momentum p=gamma mv travels in a circle with speed v, the inertial mass calcul ation ab ove gives M -in ertial = gamma m for a circling relativistic electron, and not just m the electron’s rest mass . Extending the radius here towards infinity also gives a linearly moving electron an inertial mass M = gamma m and not just the electron's rest mass m."</span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span class=js-expanded-comment><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'> As far as I know these are all original derivations of the inertial mass of a resting electron, a photon and a relativistic electron based on a circulating photon model of an electron. I would be pleased to be shown otherwise.</span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span class=js-expanded-comment><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'> Richard</span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>On Jan 24, 2016, at 6:42 AM, Roychoudhuri, Chandra <</span><a href="mailto:chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>chandra.roychoudhuri@uconn.edu</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>Yes, Vlad, that is also my viewpoint.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>I do not remember whether I have attached this paper while communicating with you earlier. I call the “plenum” Cosmic Tension Field (CTF), to be descriptive in its essential properties.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt'>Chandra.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><b><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span class=apple-converted-space><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'> </span></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>General [</span><a href="mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;color:purple'>mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif'>]<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><b>On Behalf Of<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></b>Vladimir Tamari<br><b>Sent:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Saturday, January 23, 2016 7:00 PM<br><b>To:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br><b>Subject:</b><span class=apple-converted-space> </span>Re: [General] (no subject)</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Hi Richard <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>I barge into your discussion without knowing your views on a "plenum field" but if it is an ether I definitely think there is one. A "coefficent of inertia" might be defined as the amount of momentum the ether resists. In a charged or gravitational field this coefficent would increase...I think of this in terms of my Beautiful Universe ether of dielectric nodes, except this may give the wrong idea it is something matter wades in.. not so. Matter and ether are made if the selfsame nodes of energy!<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Cheers<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Vladimir<br><br>_____________________<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><a href="http://vladimirtamari.com/"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>vladimirtamari.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span lang=EN-GB><br>On Jan 21, 2016, at 7:41 AM, Richard Gauthier <</span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Hi Hodge,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> I don’t remember asking that. But if I did, I’m glad the question was helpful.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> I’m thinking about inertia these days. Do you or others have any insights about its nature?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> Richard<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>On Jan 20, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Hodge John <</span><a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>jchodge@frontier.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><div><div><div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2533"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>Richard Gauthier:</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2535"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>You asked if the galaxy redshift, Pioneer anomaly, Pound--Rebka experiment model had a velocity term. I looked at redshift data for 1 galaxy and found no indication of a velocity term.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2537"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2539"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>I had not noticed this in the equations. Your suggestion that the plenum field can look like the Higgs field seems valid. That is, the acceleration of the plenum field looks like it adds energy (mass) is a Higgs Field characteristic. Thus, the plenum is closer to the idea of a quantum field and Higgs field (weak force).</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2541"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2543"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>Thanks for the insight.</span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2545"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB style='font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'> </span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1453325918779_2579"><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Hodge<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><br><a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at</span><a href="mailto:vladimirtamari@hotmail.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>vladimirtamari@hotmail.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><br><a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB><2012.2_JMP_Space as real field.pdf></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'><br><a href="</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>phys@a-giese.de</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><table class=MsoNormalTable border=1 cellspacing=3 cellpadding=0 style='border:none;border-top:solid #AAABB6 1.0pt'><tr><td width=105 style='width:78.75pt;border:none;padding:11.25pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:22.5pt'><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style='color:purple;text-decoration:none'><img border=0 width=32 height=32 id="_x0000_i1030" src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png" alt="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png"></span></a><o:p></o:p></p></td><td width=470 style='width:352.5pt;border:none;padding:15.0pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:22.5pt;line-height:13.5pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#41424E'>Diese E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird.<span class=apple-converted-space> </span><br></span><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient" target="_blank"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#4453EA'>www.avast.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></p></td></tr></table><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at </span><a href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>Wolf@nascentinc.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB><a href=</span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='color:purple'>"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</span></a><span lang=EN-GB>><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB>Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB></a><o:p></o:p></span></pre></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span lang=EN-GB> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;background:white'>_______________________________________________</span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'><br><span style='background:white'>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at<span class=apple-converted-space> </span></span></span><a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:purple;background:white'>richgauthier@gmail.com</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'><br><span style='background:white'><a href="</span></span><a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:purple;background:white'>http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</span></a><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;background:white'>"></span><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'><br><span style='background:white'>Click here to unsubscribe</span><br><span style='background:white'></a></span></span><span lang=EN-GB><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>