<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Al:<br>
Glad to hear you say "wave function collpase in any version is a bag
of crap!"<br>
<br>
However to prove it we would need to build or design a simultaneous
monte-carlo simulation analog probability computer that can
simultaneously hold multiple scenarios as reversible branches which
explore various possibilities and then physically pull back from all
but the chosen outcome.<br>
I think my brain and perhaps a quantum computer could work that way.<br>
<br>
Its a project I've been intending to follow-up on but perhaps it has
already been done. References welcome.<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
wolf<br>
<br>
Also if atoms could be shown to act like resonance absorbing
antennas then arrays of them would respond to wide area EM waves but
only one would succeed in pulling in a quantum of energy. Its a
version of Loading theory ( see Eric Reiters paper in te SPIE vol)
that could provide a physical mechanism for an EM wave collapse. <br>
<br>
wb<br>
<br>
Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/8/2016 11:48 AM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-93c16721-59f4-425e-a0d4-cfbaa09c894a-1454960907215@3capp-webde-bs08"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi Hodge et al.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Well that's one way (and much more efficient one) of
looking at it. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>However, I think your redition of wave function collapse
is not the fully orthodox version which supposes that the
collapse occures by agency of a sentient being. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And, from Albrecht's point of view, the calculation of
the band pattern done aforehand in accord with what he wants
to call the conventional understanding should come out
different than the actual result. For him, the issue is
inconsistence of the theory rather than mysterious lab
results. I gather, he would agree that the pattern does not
change for the moving observer and conclude that, that fact
is symptomatic of inconsistency in the conventional
understanding of deB waves.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>FYI: I hold that wave function collpase in any version
is a bag of crap! My arguments are fully given on
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com">www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com</a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best, Al</div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding:
10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5;
word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Montag,
08. Februar 2016 um 19:03 Uhr<br>
<b>Von:</b> "Hodge John" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com"><jchodge@frontier.com></a><br>
<b>An:</b> "Nature of Light and Particles - General
Discussion"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] De Broglie Wave</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div style="color: rgb(0,0,0);background-color:
rgb(255,255,255);font-family: HelveticaNeue ,
Helvetica Neue , Helvetica , Arial , Lucida Grande ,
sans-serif;font-size: 16.0px;">The screen is the
"observer" that causes the collapse of the
wavefunctin. A moving human will see bands. Will the
bands be in a different position if the human is
moving?
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1454954441262_2403"> </div>
<div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br>
</div>
<div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;">
<div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue , Helvetica
Neue , Helvetica , Arial , Lucida Grande ,
sans-serif;font-size: 16.0px;">
<div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue , Helvetica
Neue , Helvetica , Arial , Lucida Grande ,
sans-serif;font-size: 16.0px;">
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">On Monday,
February 8, 2016 11:20 AM,
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">"af.kracklauer@web.de"</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de"><af.kracklauer@web.de></a> wrote:</font></div>
<div class="y_msg_container">
<div id="yiv9159182760">
<div>
<div style="font-family:
Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Your challenge is easy! In fact
my last responce covered it. The
RELEVANT velocity is the relative
velocity between the particle and
the slit; not that between the
observer-particle or observer-slit.
An observer will see all kinds of
distortions of the events, starting
with simple persepctive due to being
at some distance from the slit and
its registration screen. In additon
this observer will see those deB
waves affecting the particle (NOT
from the particle, nor from the
slit, but from the universal
background there before either the
particle or slit came into being)
as perspectively-relativistically
distorted (twin-clock type
distortion). BUT, the observer will
still see the same over-all
background because the totality of
background signals (not just those
to which this particle is tuned),
i.e., its spectral energy density,
is itself Lorentz invariant. That
is, the observer's motion does not
enable it to empirically
distinguish between the background
in the various frames, nor does the
background engender friction forces.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>You have got to get your head
around the idea that deB waves are
independant of particles whatever
their frame.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Schrördinger did toy with some
aspects that deBroglie used, but
never did succeed in rationalizing
his eq. in those or any other terms.
For him, when died, wave functions
were ontologically completely
mysterious. From SED proponents,
I'm told, my thoughts in #7 on <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com">www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com</a></a>,
are unique in formulating S's eq. in
terms of deB concepts. Try it,
maybe you'll like it. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>There are other SED-type stories
too, but as they are based on
diffusion (parabolic, not
hyperbolic) precesses, I find them
self contradictory.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, Al</div>
<div>
<div style="margin: 10.0px 5.0px
5.0px 10.0px;padding: 10.0px 0
10.0px 10.0px;border-left: 2.0px
solid rgb(195,217,229);">
<div style="margin: 0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Montag,
08. Februar 2016 um 141 Uhr<br
clear="none">
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht Giese"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a><br
clear="none">
<b>An:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a><br
clear="none">
<b>Cc:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>,
"Richard Gauthier"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] De
Broglie Wave</div>
<div
class="yiv9159182760yqt8242382347"
id="yiv9159182760yqt88158">
<div>
<div style="background-color:
rgb(255,255,255);">Hi Al,<br
clear="none">
<br clear="none">
if you follow de Broglie,
you should have an
explanation for the
following experiment (here
again):<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Electrons move at 0.1 c
towards the double slit.
Behind the double slit there
is an interference pattern
generated, which in the
frame of the slit follows
the rule of de Broglie. But
now there is an observer
also moving at 0.1 c
parallel to the beam of
electrons. In his frame the
electrons have momentum=0
and so wavelength=infinite.
That means: No interference
pattern. But there is in
fact a pattern which does
not disappear just because
there is another observer.
And the moving observer will
see the pattern. - This is a
falsification of de
Broglie's rule. What else?<br
clear="none">
<br clear="none">
The understanding that the
de Broglie wave is a
property of the particle
(even though depending on
their speed, but not on an
interaction) was not my idea
but the one of Schrödinger
and Dirac and many others.
Also by de Broglie himself.<br
clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Ciao Albrecht<br
clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<div
class="yiv9159182760moz-cite-prefix">Am
08.02.2016 um 03:30
schrieb <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>:</div>
<blockquote>
<div style="font-family:
Verdana;font-size:
12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>BUT, the laws of
Physics for "being"
in a frame are not
the laws for
interacting between
frames! The deB.
wave is not a
feature of a
particle in its own
frame, but a feature
of the interaction
of such a particle
with at least one
other particle in
another frame. When
the two frames are
moving with respect
to each other, then
the features of the
interaction cannot
be Lorentz
invariants. When
one particle is
interacting with
another particle (or
ensemble---slit say)
the relevant physics
is determined by the
deB wave in that
sitation, whatever
it looks like to an
observer in a third
frame with yet
different relative
velocities. It is a
perspective effect:
a tree is the same
ontological size in
fact no matter how
small it appears to
distant observers.
Observed diminished
size(s) cannot be
"invriant."
Appearances =/=
,,so sein''.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>You have gotten
your head stuck on
the idea that deB.
waves are
characteristics
intrinsic to
particles in an of
themselves.
Recalibrate! DeB
waves are
charactteristics of
the mutual
interaction of
particles.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best, Al</div>
<div>
<div style="margin:
10.0px 5.0px 5.0px
10.0px;padding:
10.0px 0 10.0px
10.0px;border-left:
2.0px solid
rgb(195,217,229);">
<div
style="margin: 0
0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Sonntag,
07. Februar 2016
um 22:10 Uhr<br
clear="none">
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht
Giese" <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>An:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Cc:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a>,
"Richard
Gauthier" <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[General] De
Broglie Wave</div>
<div>
<div
style="background-color:
rgb(255,255,255);">Hi Al,<br clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
at one of your
points I
really
disagree. The
physical laws
have to be
fulfilled in
every frame.
That means
that all
physical
processes have
to obey the
same laws in
all frames. So
also the
process at the
double slit.
But the rule
given by de
Broglie looks
correct in
only one
frame, that is
the frame
where the
double slit is
at rest. For
an observer in
motion the
diffraction
pattern looks
very similar
as for the
observer at
rest, but for
the observer
in motion the
results
according to
de Broglie are
completely
different,
because the
momentum of
the particle
is different
in a wide
range in the
frame of a
moving
observer and
so is the
wavelength
assigned to
the particle.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
The specific
case: At
electron
scattering,
the observer
co-moving with
the electron
will see a
similar
pattern as the
observer at
rest, but de
Broglie says
that for this
observer there
does not exist
any pattern.
That is
strongly
incorrect.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
The
Schrödinger
equation and
also the Dirac
function
should have
correct
results in
different
frames, at
least at
non-relativistic
speeds. This
requirement is
clearly
violated
through their
use of de
Broglie's
rule.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
Grüße<br
clear="none">
Albrecht<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
PS: Your
article refers
to "Stochastic
Electrodynamics".
That is in my
knowledge not
standard
physics and so
a new
assumption.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<div
class="yiv9159182760moz-cite-prefix">Am
07.02.2016 um
19:03 schrieb
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>:</div>
<blockquote>
<div
style="font-family:
Verdana;font-size:
12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi
Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>In my
view the story
in my paper
has no new
assunptions,
rather new
words for old
assumptions.
As I, along
with most
others, see
it, there is
no conflict
with
experiment,
but a less
than fully
transparent
explantion for
experimental
observations
(particle beam
diffrction)
otherwise
unexplained.
At the time
of writing,
and nowadays
too (although
I'd to think
that my paper
rationalizes
DeB's story)
it was the
most widely
accepted story
for this
phenomna. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The only
entities that
logically need
to be Lorentz
invariant are
the particle.
I the deB
wave is not a
'Bestandteil'
of the
particle, but
of its
relations with
its
envionment,
then
invariance is
not defined
nor useful.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>M.f.G.
Al</div>
<div>
<div
style="margin:
10.0px 5.0px
5.0px
10.0px;padding:
10.0px 0
10.0px
10.0px;border-left:
2.0px solid
rgb(195,217,229);">
<div
style="margin:
0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Sonntag,
07. Februar
2016 um 14:39
Uhr<br
clear="none">
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht
Giese" <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>An:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Cc:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a>,
"Richard
Gauthier" <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[General] De
Broglie Wave</div>
<div>
<div
style="background-color:
rgb(255,255,255);">Hi Al,<br clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
thank you for
your
reference.
Your paper has
a lot of
intelligent
thoughts but
also a lot of
additional
assumptions.
With reference
to the de
Broglie wave,
I think, is
the situation
much simpler
on the level
of
conservative
knowledge. De
Broglie has
misunderstood
relativity
(particularly
dilation) and
so seen a
conflict which
does in fact
not exist. He
has solved the
conflict by
inventing an
additional
"fictitious"
wave which has
no other
foundation in
physics, and
also his
"theorem of
harmonic
phases" which
as well is an
invention
without need.
And his result
is in conflict
with the
experiment if
we ask for
Lorentz
invariance or
even for
Galilean
invariance. -
If we follow
the basic idea
of de Broglie
by, however,
avoiding his
logical error
about
relativity, we
come easily to
a description
of matter
waves without
logical
conflicts.
This does not
need new
philosophy or
other effort
at this level.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
Best, Albrecht<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<div
class="yiv9159182760moz-cite-prefix">Am
06.02.2016 um
03:15 schrieb
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>:</div>
<blockquote>
<div
style="font-family:
Verdana;font-size:
12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi
Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>DeBroglie's
verbage is
indeed quite
rococo!
Nonetheless,
his
machinations,
although
verbalized, in
the true
tradtion of
quantum
mechanics,
mysteriously,
can be
reinterpreted
(i.e.,
alternate
verbage found
without
changing any
of the math)
so as to tell
a fully, if
(somewhat)
hetrodoxical,
story. See
#11 on <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com/"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.Nonloco-Physics.0catch.com">www.Nonloco-Physics.0catch.com</a></a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>cc:
Waves are
never a
characteristic
of a single,
point-like
entity, but
colletive
motion of a
medium. IF
they exist at
all. My view
is that
E&M waves
are a fiction
wrought by
Fourier
analysis. The
only real
physical part
is an
"interaction",
which mnight
as well be
thought of an
absract string
between
charges.
Also,
neutrons have
electric
multipole
moments; i.e.,
they are
totally
neutral but
not
charge-free. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best,
Al </div>
<div>
<div
style="margin:
10.0px 5.0px
5.0px
10.0px;padding:
10.0px 0
10.0px
10.0px;border-left:
2.0px solid
rgb(195,217,229);">
<div
style="margin:
0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Freitag,
05. Februar
2016 um 21:43
Uhr<br
clear="none">
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht
Giese" <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>An:</b> <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>,
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Cc:</b> "Richard
Gauthier" <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[General] De
Broglie Wave</div>
<div>
<div
style="background-color:
rgb(255,255,255);">Hi Al,<br clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
true, in the
frame of the
particle the
dB wavelength
is infinite.
Because in its
own frame the
momentum of
the particle
is 0. The
particle
oscillates
with the
frequency of
the particle's
Zitterbewegung
(which
background
fields do you
have in mind?
De Brogie does
not mention
them). This
oscillation is
in no
contradiction
with this
wavelength as
the phase
speed is also
infinite. For
the
imagination,
the latter
means that all
points of that
wave oscillate
with the same
phase at any
point.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
Which
background
waves do you
have in mind?
What is the
CNONOICAL
momentum? And
what about
E&M
interactions?
De Broglie has
not related
his wave to a
specific
field. An
E&M field
would anyway
have no effect
in the case of
neutron
scattering for
which the same
de Broglie
formalism is
used. And into
which frame do
you see the
wave
Lorentz-transformed?<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
So, an
electron in
his frame has
an infinite
wavelength and
in his frame
has the double
slit moving
towards the
particle. How
can an
interference
at the slits
occur? No
interference
can happen
under these
conditions.
But, as I have
explained in
the paper, the
normal wave
which
accompanies
the electron
by normal
rules (i.e.
phase speed =
c) will have
an
interference
with its own
reflection,
which has then
a wavelength
which fits to
the
expectation of
de Broglie.
But that is a
very local
event (in a
range of
approx. 10^-12
m for the
electron) and
it is not at
all a property
of the
electron as de
Broglie has
thought.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
To say it
again: The de
Broglie
wavelength
cannot be a
steady
property of
the particle.
But
Schrödinger
and Dirac have
incorporated
it into their
QM equations
with this
understanding.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
If I should
have
misunderstood
you, please
show the
mathematical
calculations
which you
mean.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
Ciao, Albrecht<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<div
class="yiv9159182760moz-cite-prefix">Am
05.02.2016 um
19:20 schrieb
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>:</div>
<blockquote>
<div
style="font-family:
Verdana;font-size:
12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Hi:
Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Your
arguments
don't resonate
with me. The
deB' wave
length is
infinite in
the particles
frame: it is
the standing
wave formed by
the inpinging
background
waves having a
freq. = the
particle's
Zitterbewegung.
If these TWO
waves are each
Lorentz
x-formed to
another frame
and added
there, they
exhibit
exactly the
DeB'
modulation
wavelength
proportional
to the
particle's
momentum. The
only
mysterious
feature then
is that the
proportionality
is to the
CNONICAL
momentum,
i.e.,
including the
vector
potential of
whatever
exterior
E&M
interactions
are in-coming.
Nevertheless,
everything
works our
without
contradiction.
A particle
oscillates in
place at its
Zitter freq.
while the
Zitter signals
are modulated
by the DeB'
wavelength as
they move
through slits,
say.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, L</div>
<div>
<div
style="margin:
10.0px 5.0px
5.0px
10.0px;padding:
10.0px 0
10.0px
10.0px;border-left:
2.0px solid
rgb(195,217,229);">
<div
style="margin:
0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Freitag,
05. Februar
2016 um 12:28
Uhr<br
clear="none">
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht
Giese" <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>An:</b> "Richard
Gauthier" <a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a>,
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a></a><br
clear="none">
<b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[General] De
Broglie Wave</div>
<div>Hi
Richard and
Al, hi All,<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
recently we
had a
discussion
here about two
topics:<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
1. The
functionality
of the de
Broglie wave,
particularly
its wavelength<br
clear="none">
if seen from a
different
inertial
system. Such
cases lead to
illogical<br
clear="none">
situations.<br
clear="none">
2. The problem
of the
apparent
asymmetry at
relativistic
dilation.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
I have
investigated
these cases
and found that
they are in
some way<br
clear="none">
connected.
Relativistic
dilation is
not as simple
as it is
normally<br
clear="none">
taken. It
looks
asymmetric if
it is
incorrectly
treated. An
asymmetry<br
clear="none">
would falsify
Special
Relativity.
But it is in
fact
symmetrical if<br
clear="none">
properly
handled and
understood.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
It is funny
that both
problems are
connected to
each other
through the<br
clear="none">
fact that de
Broglie
himself has
misinterpreted
dilation. From
this<br
clear="none">
incorrect
understanding
he did not
find another
way out than
to invent<br
clear="none">
his "theorem
of phase
harmony"; with
all logical
conflicts
resulting<br
clear="none">
from this
approach.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
If relativity
is properly
understood,
the problem
seen by de
Broglie<br
clear="none">
does not
exist.
Equations
regarding
matter waves
can be derived
which<br
clear="none">
work properly,
i.e. conform
to the
experiments
but avoid the
logical<br
clear="none">
conflicts.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
As announced,
I have
composed a
paper about
this. It can
be found at:<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.academia.edu/21564534/The_Conflict_with_the_De_Broglie_Wavelength"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.academia.edu/21564534/The_Conflict_with_the_De_Broglie_Wavelength">https://www.academia.edu/21564534/The_Conflict_with_the_De_Broglie_Wavelength</a></a><br
clear="none">
.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
I thank
Richard
Gauthier for
the discussion
which we had
about this<br
clear="none">
topic. It
caused me to
investigate
the problem
and to find a
solution.<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
Albrecht<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
---<br
clear="none">
Diese E-Mail
wurde von
Avast
Antivirus-Software
auf Viren
geprüft.<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a></a><br clear="none">
<br
clear="none">
_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
If you no
longer wish to
receive
communication
from the
Nature of
Light and
Particles
General
Discussion
List at <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a><br
clear="none">
<a href=<a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a></a>><br
clear="none">
Click here to
unsubscribe<br
clear="none">
</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<table
class="yahoo-compose-table-card"
style="border-top:
1.0px solid
rgb(170,171,182);">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td
colspan="1"
rowspan="1"
style="width:
470.0px;padding-top:
20.0px;color:
rgb(65,66,78);font-size:
13.0px;font-family:
Arial ,
Helvetica ,
sans-serif;line-height:
18.0px;">Diese
E-Mail wurde
von einem
virenfreien
Computer
gesendet, der
von Avast
geschützt
wird.<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="yiv9159182760moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.avast.com/"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.avast.com">www.avast.com</a></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<table
class="yahoo-compose-table-card"
style="border-top:
1.0px solid
rgb(170,171,182);">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td
colspan="1"
rowspan="1"
style="width:
470.0px;padding-top:
20.0px;color:
rgb(65,66,78);font-size:
13.0px;font-family:
Arial ,
Helvetica ,
sans-serif;line-height:
18.0px;">Diese
E-Mail wurde
von einem
virenfreien
Computer
gesendet, der
von Avast
geschützt
wird.<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" style="color: rgb(68,83,234);"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.avast.com">www.avast.com</a></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<table
class="yahoo-compose-table-card"
style="border-top:
1.0px solid
rgb(170,171,182);">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td
colspan="1"
rowspan="1"
style="width:
470.0px;padding-top:
20.0px;color:
rgb(65,66,78);font-size:
13.0px;font-family:
Arial ,
Helvetica ,
sans-serif;line-height:
18.0px;">Diese
E-Mail wurde
von einem
virenfreien
Computer
gesendet, der
von Avast
geschützt
wird.<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" style="color: rgb(68,83,234);"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.avast.com">www.avast.com</a></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<table
class="yahoo-compose-table-card"
style="border-top: 1.0px
solid rgb(170,171,182);">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="1"
rowspan="1"
style="width:
470.0px;padding-top:
20.0px;color:
rgb(65,66,78);font-size:
13.0px;font-family:
Arial , Helvetica ,
sans-serif;line-height:
18.0px;">Diese
E-Mail wurde von
einem virenfreien
Computer gesendet,
der von Avast
geschützt wird.<br
clear="none">
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" style="color: rgb(68,83,234);"
target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.avast.com">www.avast.com</a></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="yqt8242382347" id="yqt32576">_______________________________________________<br
clear="none">
If you no longer wish to receive
communication from the Nature of Light and
Particles General Discussion List at <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="jchodge@frontier.com"
target="_parent"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com">jchodge@frontier.com</a></a><br
clear="none">
<a href="<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br
clear="none">
Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none">
</a></div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________ If you
no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature
of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
target="_blank"> Click here to unsubscribe </a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>