<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Hi Wolf,<br>
    <br>
    regarding my mass model (i.e. the fact that any extended object must
    have inertia):<br>
    <br>
    You suspect that there are hidden assumptions which I did not state.
    Yes, there are more assumptions, but those are so much common sense
    that it did not find it necessary to mention them explicitly. I can
    make that up here. <br>
    <br>
    If an object is extended there must be on the one hand a forces
    which binds the constituents to each other. On the other hand the
    force has to be in a way that there is a distance maintained,
    otherwise an extension does logically not exist. (There is one other
    possibility for an extension, that is a planetary system. But this
    has to be excluded here as it needs massive constituents. Now the
    goal here is to deduce mass and so mass cannot be assumed as a
    pre-condition. That excludes this possibility.)<br>
    <br>
    Now, if we have this situation that there is an extended object with
    some kind of force which makes the extended object possible in some
    way, and the propagation of this force takes place with c, then this
    is sufficient to have inertia; then we have necessarily inertia,
    there is no other outcome possible.<br>
    <br>
    I have made another further assumption in my derivation. That is the
    shape of the binding field. For the field shape which I have chosen
    the result of my derivation is Newton's law of motion (in the
    non-relativistic case). If we assume a different shape then there
    will be still inertia, however Newton's law will not be fulfilled.
    Resumé again: inertia cannot be avoided for an extended object.<br>
    <br>
    Best, Albrecht<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 08.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb Wolfgang
      Baer:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:56B8EC03.7080702@nascentinc.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      To All:<br>
      This is a very interesting discussion, although I feel you two
      (Albrecht, Al) and  are talking past each other.<br>
       The repetition of Albrecht's call to read his derivation is
      appropriate. I have done so and see no problem with the conclusion
      that extended particles will have inertia if c is finite. The
      problem is not with the derivation but with the insistence that
      the speed of light and particle extension are all that is
      required. There are a lot of hidden assumptions (like what holds
      the extended particle together, and why does a force on one side
      of an extended particle not also move the other side) and if one
      adds them all up does one come up with a simpler overall
      explanation for inertial mass than just assuming inertial mass to
      begin with.<br>
      <br>
      However the issue I would like to question is  ""interaction",
      which mnight as well be thought of an absract string between
      charges."<br>
      I've been trying to get an answer to the question "what are
      strings made of" on ResearchGate and the best answer besides that
      it is an abstract useful concept has been "Strings are made of
      smoke and mirrors", However I lean toward Strings are made of
      Action, i.e. the material of a world line. Is this what you ,Al,
      had in mind with the quoted passage?<br>
      <br>
      Wolf<br>
      <br>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/5/2016 6:15 PM, <a
          moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
          href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a></a>
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-67b38ada-96f4-4d0a-8fa6-ff53a191ad48-1454724949062@3capp-webde-bs37"
        type="cite">
        <div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
          <div>
            <div>Hi Albrecht:</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>DeBroglie's verbage is indeed quite rococo!
               Nonetheless, his machinations, although verbalized, in
              the true tradtion of quantum mechanics, mysteriously, can
              be reinterpreted (i.e., alternate verbage found without
              changing any of the math) so as to tell a fully, if
              (somewhat) hetrodoxical, story.  See #11 on <a
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                href="http://www.Nonloco-Physics.0catch.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.Nonloco-Physics.0catch.com">www.Nonloco-Physics.0catch.com</a></a>.</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>cc:  Waves are never a characteristic of a single,
              point-like entity, but colletive motion of a medium.  IF
              they exist at all.  My view is that E&M waves are a
              fiction wrought by Fourier analysis.  The only real
              physical part is an "interaction", which mnight as well be
              thought of an absract string between charges.  Also,
              neutrons have electric multipole moments; i.e., they are
              totally neutral but not charge-free. </div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>Best,  Al </div>
            <div> 
              <div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px;
                padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid
                #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode:
                space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
                <div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Freitag,

                  05. Februar 2016 um 21:43 Uhr<br>
                  <b>Von:</b> "Albrecht Giese" <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br>
                  <b>An:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                    href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a>,
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
                  <b>Cc:</b> "Richard Gauthier" <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a><br>
                  <b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] De Broglie Wave</div>
                <div name="quoted-content">
                  <div style="background-color: rgb(255,255,255);">Hi
                    Al,<br>
                    <br>
                    true, in the frame of the particle the dB wavelength
                    is infinite. Because in its own frame the momentum
                    of the particle is 0. The particle oscillates with
                    the frequency of the particle's Zitterbewegung
                    (which background fields do you have in mind? De
                    Brogie does not mention them). This oscillation is
                    in no contradiction with this wavelength as the
                    phase speed is also infinite. For the imagination,
                    the latter means that all points of that wave
                    oscillate with the same phase at any point.<br>
                    <br>
                    Which  background waves do you have in mind? What is
                    the CNONOICAL momentum? And what about E&M
                    interactions? De Broglie has not related his wave to
                    a specific field. An E&M field would anyway have
                    no effect in the case of neutron scattering for
                    which the same de Broglie formalism is used. And
                    into which frame do you see the wave
                    Lorentz-transformed?<br>
                    <br>
                    So, an electron in his frame has an infinite
                    wavelength and in his frame has the double slit
                    moving towards the particle. How can an interference
                    at the slits occur? No interference can happen under
                    these conditions. But, as I have explained in the
                    paper, the normal wave which accompanies the
                    electron by normal rules (i.e. phase speed = c) will
                    have an interference with its own reflection, which
                    has then a wavelength which fits to the expectation
                    of de Broglie. But that is a very local event (in a
                    range of approx. 10^-12 m for the electron) and it
                    is not at all a property of the electron as de
                    Broglie has thought.<br>
                    <br>
                    To say it again: The de Broglie wavelength cannot be
                    a steady property of the particle. But Schrödinger
                    and Dirac have incorporated it into their QM
                    equations with this understanding.<br>
                    <br>
                    If I should have misunderstood you, please show the
                    mathematical calculations which you mean.<br>
                    <br>
                    Ciao, Albrecht<br>
                    <br>
                     
                    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 05.02.2016 um 19:20
                      schrieb <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                        href="af.kracklauer@web.de" target="_parent">af.kracklauer@web.de</a>:</div>
                    <blockquote>
                      <div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size:
                        12.0px;">
                        <div>
                          <div>Hi: Albrecht:</div>
                          <div> </div>
                          <div>Your arguments don't resonate with me.
                             The deB' wave length is infinite in the
                            particles frame: it is the standing wave
                            formed by the inpinging background waves
                            having a freq. = the particle's
                            Zitterbewegung.  If these TWO waves are each
                            Lorentz x-formed to another frame and added
                            there, they exhibit exactly the DeB'
                            modulation wavelength proportional to the
                            particle's momentum.  The only mysterious
                            feature then is that the proportionality is
                            to the CNONICAL momentum, i.e., including
                            the vector potential of whatever exterior
                            E&M interactions are in-coming.
                             Nevertheless, everything works our without
                            contradiction.  A particle oscillates in
                            place at its Zitter freq. while the Zitter
                            signals are modulated by the DeB' wavelength
                            as they move through slits, say.</div>
                          <div> </div>
                          <div>ciao,  L</div>
                          <div> 
                            <div style="margin: 10.0px 5.0px 5.0px
                              10.0px;padding: 10.0px 0 10.0px
                              10.0px;border-left: 2.0px solid
                              rgb(195,217,229);">
                              <div style="margin: 0 0 10.0px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Freitag,

                                05. Februar 2016 um 12:28 Uhr<br>
                                <b>Von:</b> "Albrecht Giese" <a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                                  href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a></a><br>
                                <b>An:</b> "Richard Gauthier" <a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                                  href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com"><richgauthier@gmail.com></a></a>,
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                                  href="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                                  target="_parent">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a><br>
                                <b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] De Broglie
                                Wave</div>
                              <div>Hi Richard and Al, hi All,<br>
                                <br>
                                recently we had a discussion here about
                                two topics:<br>
                                <br>
                                1. The functionality of the de Broglie
                                wave, particularly its wavelength<br>
                                if seen from a different inertial
                                system. Such cases lead to illogical<br>
                                situations.<br>
                                2. The problem of the apparent asymmetry
                                at relativistic dilation.<br>
                                <br>
                                I have investigated these cases and
                                found that they are in some way<br>
                                connected. Relativistic dilation is not
                                as simple as it is normally<br>
                                taken. It looks asymmetric if it is
                                incorrectly treated. An asymmetry<br>
                                would falsify Special Relativity. But it
                                is in fact symmetrical if<br>
                                properly handled and understood.<br>
                                <br>
                                It is funny that both problems are
                                connected to each other through the<br>
                                fact that de Broglie himself has
                                misinterpreted dilation. From this<br>
                                incorrect understanding he did not find
                                another way out than to invent<br>
                                his "theorem of phase harmony"; with all
                                logical conflicts resulting<br>
                                from this approach.<br>
                                <br>
                                If relativity is properly understood,
                                the problem seen by de Broglie<br>
                                does not exist. Equations regarding
                                matter waves can be derived which<br>
                                work properly, i.e. conform to the
                                experiments but avoid the logical<br>
                                conflicts.<br>
                                <br>
                                As announced, I have composed a paper
                                about this. It can be found at:<br>
                                <br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.academia.edu/21564534/The_Conflict_with_the_De_Broglie_Wavelength"
                                  target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/21564534/The_Conflict_with_the_De_Broglie_Wavelength</a><br>
                                .<br>
                                <br>
                                I thank Richard Gauthier for the
                                discussion which we had about this<br>
                                topic. It caused me to investigate the
                                problem and to find a solution.<br>
                                <br>
                                Albrecht<br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                ---<br>
                                Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast
                                Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.<br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus"
                                  target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
                                <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                                If you no longer wish to receive
                                communication from the Nature of Light
                                and Particles General Discussion List at
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                                  href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a><br>
                                <a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"
                                  target="_blank">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/af.kracklauer%40web.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>><br>
                                Click here to unsubscribe<br>
                                </a></div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                     
                    <table style="border-top: 1.0px solid
                      rgb(170,171,182);">
                      <tbody>
                        <tr>
                          <td style="width: 470.0px;padding-top:
                            20.0px;color: rgb(65,66,78);font-size:
                            13.0px;font-family: Arial , Helvetica ,
                            sans-serif;line-height: 18.0px;">Diese
                            E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer
                            gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird.<br>
                            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email"
                              style="color: rgb(68,83,234);"
                              target="_blank">www.avast.com</a></td>
                        </tr>
                      </tbody>
                    </table>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
        <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #aaabb6;">
        <tr>
                
                <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 20px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Diese E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird. <br /><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>                 </td>
        </tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>