<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi Chip,<br>
<br>
I fully agree to your considerations and conclusions. It follows
(also) from my model that the fine structure constant alpha shows
the relation between the electric force and the strong force. And
the consequence is as well that the strong force plays a much bigger
role in the physical world than it is assumed up to now.<br>
<br>
But are you aware that this is in strict conflict with main stream
physics? In traditional textbooks as well as at Wikipedia it is said
that alpha means the coupling between electric charges. Also the
original use of the constant, introduced by Arnold Sommerfeld, was
to explain fine structures in atomic spectra. (The origin of the
name.) But recently I have also found a textbook with your
explanations (which is also mine.) <br>
<br>
How or where did you find this? I am wondering how long it will take
that main stream will accept this.<br>
<br>
Greetings<br>
Albrecht<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 13.02.2016 um 16:39 schrieb Chip
Akins:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:014f01d16674$c0fa8ca0$42efa5e0$@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Gulim;
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@Gulim";
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:8.0pt;
margin-left:0in;
line-height:105%;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:KO;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1875578759;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-999108478 67698705 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-text:"%1\)";
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hi All<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">An issue has
become interesting regarding the fine structure constant.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">We observe
the fine structure constant in many different ways. It is a
prevailing constant which is uniquely and widely manifest.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">It is
understood that the fine structure constant is simply the
difference in strength between the EM force (Fe) and the
Strong force (Fs). <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Fs = Fe α.
And Fe = Fs/α. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">It seems we
may have overlooked the possibility that what we call the
nuclear strong force is present in many more circumstances
than we previously assumed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">So it seems
that for every instance where we observe the fine structure
α, <b>both</b> of these forces must be at play, or there
must be a force equal to the strength of the strong nuclear
force, which we have not previously recognized.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Thoughts?
Comments?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><b>From:</b>
General
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>John Macken<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, February 12, 2016 5:11 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [General] Gravitational Waves and de
Broglie Waves<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">Hello Everyone, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">It has been some time since
I have contributed to the discussion but I now have
something new to say because of the historic gravitational
wave announcement yesterday. It may seem as if gravitational
waves are far removed from particles, forces and de Broglie
waves, but in my world there is a strong connection. There
has been a lot of discussion in the group about the
properties of spacetime. However, the discussion has
largely ignored all the work done on gravitational waves.
These waves propagate in the medium of spacetime and they
reveal a lot of concrete information about the properties of
spacetime. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">Until yesterday there has
been a lot of doubt about whether the theoretically
predicted properties of gravitational waves were correct.
Serious efforts to detect gravitational waves have been
unsuccessful for over more than 25. We now know that the
problem was that the detectors were not sensitive enough
rather than a mistake in the concept or equations. A few
weeks after the sensitivity of LIGO was increased by a
factor of 3, they detected the first gravitational wave.
The first signal detected came from two black holes merging
about 1.3 billion years ago. The detected pattern exactly
matches the theoretical wave pattern predicted for the
merging of two black holes. The signal was a strain wave in
spacetime which had a frequency chirp from about 30 Hz to
about 250 Hz. The following link is the first official
technical paper on the subject (note the hundreds of
authors) : <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102">https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">The details about the
emitted and detected waves gives support to the model of the
universe that I have been proposing. I want to make several
points.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">There is now no doubt that the
impedance of spacetime is Z<sub>s</sub> =<i> c</i><sup>3</sup>/<i>G</i>
= 4 x 10<sup>35</sup> kg/s. This comes from gravitational
wave equations. This impedance has been known to the
community of scientists working on gravitational waves for a
long time (references available). However, now all
physicists must admit that spacetime has this important
property. I claim that all the quantum mechanical wave
properties can be analyzed using the impedance of
spacetime. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">This large impedance implies that
spacetime is not an empty void. This impedance is a
measurable property of spacetime that is about 28 orders of
magnitude larger than the impedance of steel. An empty void
would have no impedance. Also impedance implies an elastic
medium which has the ability to absorb energy and return
energy to a propagating wave. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">3)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">The model of the vacuum that I have
proposed fits perfectly with this impedance. Quantum
mechanics implies that there is a Planck length uncertainty
in the distance between points and a Planck time uncertainty
in the time dimension. If this is modeled as waves in
spacetime which are continuously modulating distance by
Planck length and modulating the rate of time by Planck
time, then suddenly everything fits. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">4)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">Using gravitational wave equations and
the impedance of spacetime, it is possible to test the
hypothesis that spacetime is really filled with these small
amplitude waves. I have shown that zero point energy
exactly fits this model.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">5)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">All the forces are explained not by
mysterious virtual photons and mysterious gravitons but by
waves and distortions of this “spacetime field”. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span
style="color:#444444"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">6)<span
style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span
style="color:#444444">Using quantifiable properties of
spacetime and Planck length/time waves, it is possible to
move from hand waving models of particles, fields and de
Broglie waves to models which can be mathematically analyzed
and tested. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">Previously I was not clear
enough about whether these waves filling spacetime fit the
definition of being true “energy density”. Suppose that we
assume that the definition of “observable” energy is: <i>E</i><sup>2</sup>
= (<i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup> + (<i>pc</i>)<sup>2</sup>.
All the fermions and bosons meet this definition of being
observable energy. I claim that the difference between
observable energy density (fermions and bosons) and the
unobservable energy density of the waves in spacetime is
that observable energy possess quantized angular momentum
(spin) while unobservable energy does not possess spin.
These Planck length/time waves have energy-like properties
such as a frequency, wave amplitude and encounter the
impedance of spacetime, but without quantized angular
momentum they do not interact with fermions and bosons in a
detectable way. These Planck length/time waves are the most
perfect superfluid possible. Their presence is felt because
they are responsible for giving spacetime constants such as:
<i>c</i>, <i>G</i>, </span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Cambria
Math",serif;color:#444444">ħ</span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">, ε<sub>o</sub> and <i>Z</i><sub>s</sub>.
Also these small amplitude waves are responsible for
uncertainty and probabilistic characteristics of quantum
mechanics.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">If you treat these waves as
if they had quantized angular momentum (spin), then the
maximum energy density of spacetime would be about 10<sup>113</sup>
J/m<sup>3</sup>. However, without angular momentum to make
them quantized, the vacuum appears to be an empty void which
possesses mysterious physical properties. The moment that
new angular momentum is introduced into spacetime, then some
of the incomplete energy density of the Planck length/time
waves in spacetime becomes complete and observable. For
example, two spiraling black holes introduce the missing
angular momentum to some of the waves in spacetime and they
become observable gravitational waves. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">I want to use information
from the above referenced gravitational wave paper to
support the contention that spacetime is filled with small
amplitude waves. According to this cited paper, the peak
power emitted by these black holes as they were merging was
3.6 x 10<sup>49</sup> watts. This is a tremendous power
which approaches Planck power. It is possible to drill
deeper and analyze the forces involved in the emission of
this power. Energy is force times distance. Power (P) is
force (F) divided by speed (v). We know the power emitted
(3.6 x 10<sup>49</sup> watts) and the paper gives the
maximum speed as about ½ the speed of light. Therefore the
implied force retarding these two merging black holes is
about: <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">F = P/v = 3.6 x 10<sup>49</sup>
w/1.5 x 10<sup>8</sup> m/s = 2.4 x 10<sup>40</sup> N. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">Another calculation can be
made of the energy density of gravitational waves leaving
the surface of the black holes at the speed of light. This
calculation gives the emitted energy density propagating
through the spacetime near the Schwarzschild radius as
roughly 2 x 10<sup>29</sup> J/m<sup>3</sup>. This is more
than 10<sup>8</sup> times greater than the <i>E</i> = <i>mc</i><sup>2</sup>
energy density of osmium. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">An interpretation of
Einstein’s field equation is that there is a maximum
possible force which is: (1/8π)c<sup>4</sup>/G = 4.8 x 10<sup>42</sup>
N. Therefore the retarding force on the merging black holes
is about 2 orders of magnitude less than the maximum
possible force. The conservation of momentum says that
every force requires an equal and opposite reaction. What
is the opposite reaction in this case? It is easy to say
that momentum is being transferred to the emitted
gravitational waves, but then the question becomes: What is
physically happening in spacetime that allows space to carry
away this large a force and power? If spacetime is
visualized as an empty void, then the only explanation is
that the force is being transferred to gravitons. The more
widely accepted explanation of gravity is that gravity is a
geometrical effect and not a true force. However this
explanation is inadequate because geometry cannot extract a
power of 10<sup>49</sup> watts and a force of 10<sup>48</sup>
N. Even claiming that gravitons exist and carry away the
power is a problem. The paper is also able to place a limit
on the Compton wavelength of gravitons (if they exist). The
finding is that a graviton must have a Compton wavelength
greater than 10<sup>16</sup> m which is a wavelength greater
than 1 light year. This obviously seems incompatible with
the emission time and frequency of the gravitational waves.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">If spacetime is filled with
Planck length/time waves which have an incomplete energy
density of about 10<sup>113</sup> J/m<sup>3</sup>, then it
is easy to see where the power and offsetting force comes
from. The gravitational waves are distorting the tremendous
incomplete energy density of the spacetime field and making
it complete by adding angular momentum. This addition then
completes the requirements for the vacuum fluctuations to
become observable energy density which can transfer momentum
and remove energy. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">What does all of this have
to do with particles, forces and de Broglie waves? Actually
I claim that all wave activity in quantum mechanics
ultimately is connected to the impedance of spacetime and
the Planck length/time waves that fill spacetime. I will be
writing a technical paper which explains this in more detail
and uses gravitational waves as numerical examples.
However, it is possible to find the answers if you combine
what has been said in this post with the information in two
attached papers. I suggest reading the “foundation” paper
first if you are interested. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
Roman",serif;color:#444444">John M.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:105%;font-family:"Times
New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #aaabb6;">
<tr>
<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 20px; color: #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Diese E-Mail wurde von einem virenfreien Computer gesendet, der von Avast geschützt wird. <br /><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email" target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a> </td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>