<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hodge and Wolf,<div class="">It would seem that the simplest explanation for the origin of inertia of an electron is in the circulating momentum of a light-speed particle (charged spin-1/2 photon) forming the electron. Changing momentum requires a force, even for the circulating charged photon within a resting electron. This explains quantitatively why the electron requires a force to accelerate it, proportional to the magnitude of the circulating momentum mc or Eo/c inside the electron, and therefore providing the electron with its inertial mass Eo/c^2 .</div><div class=""> Richard</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 22, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Hodge John <<a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" class="">jchodge@frontier.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class=""><div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1456177547156_4014" class=""><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser/>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
</div><div class="MsoNormal">Wolf:</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1456177547156_4064" class="MsoNormal">The STOE postulates a plenum (after Descartes idea) is
similar to the ether, “space” of general relativity, and gravitational ether
with some differences. The General Relativity didn’t use Mach’s principle in
its final version. So, the plenum’s relation to Mach’s principle is very nearly
the same as the “space” view of Mach’s principle. The scalar potential value
($\rho$) at all points in space (3D space) is caused by all masses, sources and
sinks in the universe. The equation in the paper has a factor of $\rho$. The
quantum concept of “local” is abandoned. The “local” concept had to be created
to distinguish the action within a speed of light cone or outside the cone. The
STOE postulates the speed of waves in the plenum travel at over 10^7 $c$
(Thomas C Van Flandern). So within our limit of measure the waves can effect
actions. Thus, the “spooky action at a distance” (entanglement) is within the
distance limit of plenum waves. This was used in the diffraction paper that
rejected Huygens-postulate-based models (all wave models). </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">The diffraction paper also used the idea the speed of
photons (light) varies with $\rho$, but not as Albrechts refractive index idea.
The gravitational field (proportional to the $\vec{\nabla} \rho$) implies the
$\rho$ changes and, therefore, the speed of light varies in varying
gravitational field. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">Please expand on your third question. Special relativity
holds the speed of light in “empty space” constant. The STOE suggest $c$
depends on $\rho$ and that there is no “empty space”. </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1456177547156_4063" class="MsoNormal">Or, are you addressing the Lorentz factor? (I like the
Lorentz Ether Theory model rather than special relativity). I had thought that
if the paper idea of inertia can be put into a form of $\dot{v} = K v$ which
would produce a exponent growth factor to some upper limit ($c$) we could get
the Lorentz factor for time and length measurements. What other fundamental
postulates would be need? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal"> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">Hodge</div><div dir="ltr" class="">
</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br class=""><br class=""></div><div style="display: block;" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""> <div dir="ltr" class=""><font face="Arial" size="2" class=""> On Monday, February 22, 2016 3:57 PM, Wolfgang Baer <<a href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com" class="">wolf@nascentinc.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></font></div> <br class=""><br class=""> <div class="y_msg_container"><div id="yiv8432909676" class=""><div class="">
John:<br clear="none" class="">
<br clear="none" class="">
Thank you for the reference, which in turn cites a long list of
papers that presumably present the details.<br clear="none" class="">
<br clear="none" class="">
Before digging in further I wonder if this work will shed light on
Mach's principle and the idea that the interaction between a local
mass and the mass of distant stars is the origin of inertia? On top
of that do these ideas address whether it is the speed of light
that actually changes in a gravitational field as Albrechts gravity
as a refraction index phenomena would suggest. And thirdly could
special relativity be explained as a kind of inertial phenomena
affecting the speed of light.<br clear="none" class="">
<br clear="none" class="">
THe speed of light seems to be inside everyone's model of the
internals of material. perhaps we could simplify things if gravity
and inertia effect its speed which changes clock rates and sizes
instead of assuming its constant and asjusting the rest of the world
to make that assumption work. <br clear="none" class="">
<br clear="none" class="">
best,<br clear="none" class="">
wolf<br clear="none" class="">
<br clear="none" class="">
<pre class="yiv8432909676moz-signature">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="yiv8432909676moz-txt-link-abbreviated" ymailto="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="yiv8432909676yqt9668359234" id="yiv8432909676yqt50767"><div class="yiv8432909676moz-cite-prefix">On 2/19/2016 10:23 PM, Hodge John
wrote:<br clear="none" class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class="">
<div id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2567" class="">
</div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2578">This
is another suggestion for inertia. It is a consideration
to lead to the structure of the neutrino and electron.</div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2577"> </div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2576"><span id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2575" style="" class=""><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2574" target="_blank" href="https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE" class=""></a><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="yiv8432909676moz-txt-link-freetext" target="_blank" href="https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE">https://www.academia.edu/22205666/Inertia_according_to_the_STOE</a>
</span></div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2573"><span style="" class=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2572"><span id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2571" style="" class="">Inertia
according
to the STOE</span></div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal"><span style="" class=""> </span></div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoPlainText" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2589"><span id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2588" style="" class="">The
Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model of photons is
extended to model the
inertia of mass. The characteristic of the plenum, hods, and
their interactions
yields the Newtonian characteristics of gravitational mass
and inertial mass.
The Equivalence Principle is derived from these
characteristics rather having
to be assumed. The characteristics have been used to derive
the STOE photon
diffraction model. An experiment has rejected all other
diffraction models. </span></div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2590"> </div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2591">Hodge</div>
<div class="yiv8432909676MsoNormal" id="yiv8432909676yui_3_16_0_1_1455949357635_2592"> </div>
<div dir="ltr" class="">
</div>
</div>
<br clear="none" class="">
<fieldset class="yiv8432909676mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br clear="none" class="">
<pre class="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="yiv8432909676moz-txt-link-abbreviated" ymailto="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="yiv8432909676moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" target="_blank" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote></div>
<br clear="none" class="">
</div></div><br class=""><div class="yqt9668359234" id="yqt91481">_______________________________________________<br clear="none" class="">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" class="">jchodge@frontier.com</a><br clear="none" class=""><a href="<a shape="rect" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br clear="none" class="">Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none" class=""></a><br clear="none" class=""></div><br class=""><br class=""></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br class="">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com" class="">richgauthier@gmail.com</a><br class=""><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" class="">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/richgauthier%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br class="">Click here to unsubscribe<br class=""></a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>