<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hodge,<br><br></div>I've not had time to follow the conversations since the twins were born. However, you made a point that I would like feedback on from any and all people.<br><br><div style="margin-left:40px"><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">"Rotating
anything must emit radiation. What keeps it from exhaustion?"<br><br></span></span></div>Physics in the English language has been diluted enough that there is not a distinction between emitted and radiated. It is considered equal to say that a photon was emitted or radiated from an atom. However, I would like to say that EM energy was emitted as a photon, but radiated either as a photon or as a standing wave (remaining bound to the electron). The difference being that, until conditions are correct, the bound EM radiation cannot form a photon and must remain attached to the source. The primary conditions for a solitonic photon is the ang mom of hbar and the energy and frequency relationship. If the source has no ang mom or ability to transfer sufficient ang mom, then it cannot radiate. (Does going from spin 1/2 to spin -1/2 give change in ang mom of 1? Can it happen w/o external influence?)<br><br></div><div>An orbiting electron does not emit photons for this reason. Does it radiate? Absolutely! How do you resolve the situation?<br></div><div><br></div>If you have thoughts on the subject, I would appreciate (but, maybe not agree with) them.<br><br></div>Andrew<br>___________________________<br><div><div><br><div><div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"></span></span><div><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Hodge John <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" target="_blank">jchodge@frontier.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div>
</div><div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">David:</span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">“made
of” - your thinking in the standard model. Magnetism is the property of the
smallest particle - the hod. As I mention in the photon construction. In any
model, there must be a start. As I mention in the 1<sup>st</sup> paragraph of
the discussion - magnetism (2 poles N and S) rather than a positive of negative
charge is a property of the smallest particle. The charge then must be derived
from the magnetic field rather than the magnetic field of rotation charges. </span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Others
have suggested a circulating something. A circulating anything is inconsistent
with the variable illumination of the diffraction and interference experiment
(hodge2015a and 2015c). That is the photon must generate a diffraction wave
like a linear array of dipole antennas (the analogy). Circulating anything that
then goes to make a photon assembly becomes incredibly complex and unlikely.
The photon must have variable energy to make the different frequencies. That is
circulating quanta is inconsistent with the experiment.</span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">But
I see you suggest one model. So the challenge is to match the properties with
the experimental results such as in hodge2015c. I don’t see how to do it.</span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Rotating
anything must emit radiation. What keeps it from exhaustion?</span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt"> </span></span></div>
<div><span><span style="font-size:13.5pt">Hodge</span></span></div><div dir="ltr">
</div><div><br><br></div><div style="display:block"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"> <div dir="ltr"><font face="Arial" size="2"> On Monday, March 28, 2016 2:18 PM, "<a href="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com" target="_blank">davidmathes8@yahoo.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com" target="_blank">davidmathes8@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<br></font></div> <br><br> <div><div><div><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div><span>John</span></div><div><span><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span><font size="3">Interesting work by explaining that only elementary particle theory is needed and not spacetime theories.</font></span></div><span class=""><div><span><font size="3"><br clear="none"></font></span></div><div style="line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><font size="3">> The polarization of photons in a magnetic field suggests the photons are magnets.</font></div></span><div dir="ltr"><font size="3"><br clear="none">And what is the magnet made of? Are we talking of an oscillating monopole states or some sub-elementary (sub-sub-atomic) particle such as an energy, quanta or quantized spacetime?</font></div><div dir="ltr"><br clear="none"></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="3">If there is an quanta circulating within a photon, could it be that the quanta has both subliminal and superluminal velocities, and we can only see the subliminal. With twisted light, the paper suggest a c - 0.1% variation and the mere possibility that c + 0.1% variation might be enough to block direct observation of FTL. </font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="3"><br clear="none"></font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="3">Just like the photonic electron models, could there be a quanta circulating within the photon in some topology such as a cylinder or washer configuration. After all, the parametric equations for a photonic electron can produce both topologies of ring and spindle torus. If one tunes the </font><span style="font-size:medium">variables in</span><span style="font-size:medium"> the parametric equation, cylinder and washer topologies can be obtained. In either case, the quanta would travel forward on the inner surface and return on the outer surface.</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium"><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium">Obviously , the cylinder would support the magnet theory of the photon. However, so would a soliton wave with a washer topology. </span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium"><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium">This leaves open the possibility that the sub-elementary particle may be a resonant circulating g magnetic monopole.</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium"><br clear="none"></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:medium">David</span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-size:10px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><br clear="none"></div><div><font size="3"><br clear="none"></font></div><div><font size="3"><br clear="none"></font></div><div style="display:block"> <blockquote style="border-left:2px solid rgb(16,16,255);margin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,"Lucida Grande",sans-serif"> <div style="font-family:HelveticaNeue,"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,"Lucida Grande",sans-serif"> <div><div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial"><font size="3"> </font></font><hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span></b> Hodge John <<a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" target="_blank">jchodge@frontier.com</a>><br clear="none"> <b style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span></b> "<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org" target="_blank">general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>> <br clear="none"> <b style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span></b> Friday, March 25, 2016 9:52 PM<br clear="none"> <b style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span></b> [General] Structure of electron<br clear="none"> </div> <div style="font-size:16px"><div><div class="h5"><br clear="none"><div><div><div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:rgb(255,255,255);font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div>
</div><div>This may be of interest.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" href="https://www.academia.edu/23702413/Structure_and_spin_of_the_neutrino_electron_and_positron" target="_blank">https://www.academia.edu/23702413/Structure_and_spin_of_the_neutrino_electron_and_positron</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div><span>Structure
and spin of the neutrino, electron, and positron</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The
Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model of photons is extended to a model of
the structure of neutrinos, electrons and positrons. The polarization of
photons in a magnetic field suggests the photons are magnets. This observation
and the STOE model of the photon suggest the hods are magnetic. Using disc
magnets as an analogy of hods suggests the structure of elementary particles.
The relative abundance of elementary particles and anti--particles is dependent
on their relative probability of formation that depends on the difficulty of
forming their structure. The structure of the neutrino explains why its
velocity is the velocity of photons. The structure of large neutrinos suggests
how they can transform into electron neutrinos. The position of north seeking
magnetic poles relative to the direction of movement is qualitatively
consistent with the ``spin'' observation. The postulate of ``space
quantization'' is unnecessary. The structure models are consistent with several
observations of elementary particle behavior. </span></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Hodge</div><div dir="ltr">
</div></div></div></div><br clear="none"></div></div>_______________________________________________<br clear="none">If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" href="mailto:davidmathes8@yahoo.com" target="_blank">davidmathes8@yahoo.com</a><br clear="none"><a href="<a rel="nofollow" shape="rect" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/davidmathes8%40yahoo.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br clear="none">Click here to unsubscribe<br clear="none"></a><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div></div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div></div></div></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>