<div dir="ltr"><div>Hodge,<br><br>I have glanced thru your articles. I'm sorry that I don't see enough in your model to warrant more of my time.<br><br>The only sections that I feel qualified to address (diffraction) leaves me unimpressed. You stated:<br></div><div style="margin-left:40px">"...all other models of diffraction are inconsistent with these observations." <br></div> I find that to be incorrect. In your simulations, you appear to be making assumptions about the experiment that are unfounded. You seem to assume that the pattern from a single slit is a plane wave incident on the 2nd slit. It is not. Thus your source term is incorrect.<br><br>In the section titled "Change in diffraction pattern with altitude," The only thing that seems to relate to altitude is the change in beam intensity (amplitude).* You don't tell how you did it. However, from the results, I would guess that you did it by changing the position of your detector relative to the slit. In a diffraction pattern this will change the number of secondary peaks within a given screen width. In your figures, the number of peaks changed from 6 to 7 per side as you moved closer to the slit. The main peak also gets narrower. This is expected, since the known pattern diverges with distance; but, what does this have to do with altitude?*<br><div><div style="margin-left:40px"><br></div><div style="margin-left:40px">* Your other examples are based on astronomical work. I must assume that you relate beam intensity with distance of slit (altitude) from a detector on the ground; however, you give no details and indicate the scales (which would be astronomical). <br><br></div>Andrew<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Hodge John <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" target="_blank">jchodge@frontier.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div>
</div><div>Andrew:</div>
<div> </div>
<div style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Universe according to the
STOE <a href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648" target="_blank">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648</a>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Inertia
according to the STOE <a href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1676" target="_blank">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1676</a>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Here
is a model with 2 constituents in the universe. Inertia is a property of one of
them (plenum) and gravity a property of the other. A constant ratio of them in
particle gives the Equivalence Principle.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">2
Constituents because that is the smallest number that can account for all the
different observation. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">You
will see that there are many experimental observations this model accounts.
Also, note it predicted and explained the variable illumination across a slit
double slit experiment.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">“Acceptably
to an audience” is a social criterion that allows all the fairy-tail physics of
today. The only science criteria are to explain and predict observations. In
the world of the small, the prime observation to be explained is the double
slit experiment.</span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Hodge</span></div><div dir="ltr">
</div></font></span></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:mules333@gmail.com">mules333@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/mules333%40gmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<br>
</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div><div id="DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br>
<table style="border-top:1px solid #aaabb6">
<tr>
<td style="width:470px;padding-top:20px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:18px">This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. <br><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank" style="color:#4453ea">www.avast.com</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table><a href="#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div>