<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
John;<br>
<br>
I just briefly looked at the paper. I have not yet followed the STOE
theory and please excuse me for that<br>
but my intuitive impression is that the experiments seem quite
consistent with Young's interpretation of waves<br>
<br>
You said:<br>
"Young noticed in his diffraction experiment that the slit edges
appear luminous (Jenkins and White 1957, p.379). Therefore, his
model<br>
consisted of the interference of the waves assumed to originate at
the edges and of the direct wave."<br>
<br>
I performed several double slit experiments as well as a dipole
antenna experiment where I illuminated two razor blades spaced so
that the edges of the two blades where an equivalent slit width
apart. The diffraction patterns were the same and I could optically
see illumination on the slit edges as Young reported.<br>
<br>
This lead me to conclude, as Young, that the interference is simply
explained by carefully taking into account the edge excitation and
re-emission. The double slit is, I believe completely explained, by
the four edges excited by the incoming wave and re-radiating. This
gives both the single slit and the double slit superimposed
pattern, which is experimentally seen.<br>
<br>
When I look at your photos fig 15 for example the result is simply
explained by a mask effect. If the edge is located at a minimum then
its edge is not excited and it simply masks the pattern from the
first slit. Similarly the other figure 8, 11 look like a careful
accounting of edge excitation and re-radiation looks (I'm intuiting
here) looks consistent with edge excitation and re-emission..<br>
<br>
<br>
Your conclusion simply suggests that the Huygens-Fresnel model is
inconsistent with these results. Which I can understand.<br>
I do not see justification for your conclusion "all wave models of
light are falsified."<br>
<br>
Does the STOE model (Newtonian Interpretation) simulation duplicate
Young's edge re-radiation hypothesis or is there more?<br>
<br>
My paper from the SPIE San Diego, Eric Reiters paper, and results
from nano-technology resonance antenna all indicate that EM
propagates as waves and are quantized by near-field resonant antenna
effects and forms of loading theory (Sommerfeld) at the time of
measurement and matter interaction. Thus Photons as traveling little
baseballs is a false interpretation and quantum mechanics with its
wave/particle duality is a needless complexity we need to
straighten out. <br>
<br>
Although I agree with much of Albrecht's ideas on relativity and
think he has much to offer. I am not sure first assuming photons
exist and then explaining their behavior by further assuming
extension effects is not just a further attempt to explain an
initial error with further "fix-up" explanation complications. <br>
Does STOE fall into this category of "fix-up" theories? <br>
It appears your experimental results are consistent with the wave
edge re-radiation interpretation of EM radiation and the photon
introduction as an observer/measurement phenomena.<br>
<br>
Along these line remember Bohr thought electrons and presumably
photons are made up observer induced explanations. <br>
<br>
best<br>
Wolf<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/10/2016 1:50 AM, Hodge John wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1883106586.133252.1460278234334.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial,
Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2608"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser/>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2660">Albrecht:</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2661">I like your
emphasis on experiment.</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2662">The STOE model
suggests the extent characteristic is where
the inertia resides. The STOE posits the plenum (like “space”
of GR) and hods.
The Hods are 2 dimensional and causes gravitational forces.
The plenum has the
extent and inertia. A photon is a column of hods with plenum
between the hods.
Hence, the extent is where the inertia is.</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2663"
style="mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2664"
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Inertia
according to the
STOE <a moz-do-not-send="true"
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2665"
href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1676">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1676</a>
</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2666"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2667">Further the
diffraction experiment is a new experiment that
is easy to do for yourself. The STOE photon model is the only
model not
rejected by this experiment. I urge you to do the experiment.
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2668"
style="mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2669"
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Diffraction
experiment and
its STOE photon simulation program rejects wave models of
light <a moz-do-not-send="true"
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2670"
href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603</a>
</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2671"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2672">I think this may
be the experiment you are seeking. It
rejects wave models. Because light and electrons display
diffraction effects,
the electron rather than a photon in the experiment should
work the same. I
think your model will fail the experiment. But then it should
be done. </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2673"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2674">Papers referenced
in this paper explain how the photon
works. The extent of the photon and its inertia and
gravitational forces are
needed for the math to work. The math works and no other model
is consistent
with this experiment result. </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2675"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2676">When an electron
and positron are collided, only photons
result. This, I think, supports the idea that electrons are
composed of
photons.</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2677"
style="mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2678"
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">Structure
and spin of the
neutrino, electron, and positron</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2679"
style="mso-layout-grid-align:none;text-autospace:none"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2680"
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2681"
href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1694"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1694">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1694</a></a>
</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2682"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1460278185687_2683">Hodge</div>
<div dir="ltr">
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>