<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
A quick read of your paper<br>
<br>
Intro; talks STOE and gives references but is there a short summary
rather than a reference to several papers.<br>
I like this summary since it gives a compact overview of your ideas.<br>
<br>
Why and how does Hods and Plenum differ from particles and space?<br>
Here we are confronted with a potential name change and a statement
about simulation, it sounds suspicious. <br>
<br>
What is a plenum density? there must be a material and a space to
have a density so does this imply the plenum is derived from
underlying material and space? Or are you postulating plenum density
as a new god given parameter?<br>
<br>
Assumptions: There are a lot of them!<br>
1) The speed of gravity (speed of a plenum) wave is >> c : ok
definite assumption may be right or wrong but clearly stated<br>
2) The plenum supports wave action. OK gravity waves ? plenum is
postulated to have inertia. OK, not definite assumption <br>
3) (3) Hods are 2 dimensional.: ok definite assumption <br>
4)The hods cause gravity in the plenum.: ok not definite assumption
<br>
"The amount of plenum captured depends on the ρ of the photon
environment." what is plenum captured mean?<br>
5) The speed of the hods and photons depend on the ρ.: not definite
assumption but a conclusion <br>
6) Each hod that presents zero cross section to the direction of
movement loweres the ρ.<br>
A photon is a column of hods.: <br>
7) <br>
<br>
Ok I'm stopping here It is obvious to me that you are combining
conclusions, important properties and a lot of properties that must
be derived from basic assumptions.<br>
<br>
I would suggest something like<br>
1) Hods exist and have the following basic properties a), b),c)<br>
2) Plenum exists and has the following basic properties .....<br>
3) Speed of gravity is infinite??<br>
4) ..etc.<br>
<br>
Then derive the additional results or properties from there.<br>
<br>
It is not a question of right or wrong but why one should learn as
new explanation or terminology unless there is a demonstrable
benefit.<br>
Its a tough hurdle that I've been tripped up on many times. <br>
<br>
Hope this helps,<br>
Wolf<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Dr. Wolfgang Baer
Research Director
Nascent Systems Inc.
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432
E-mail <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com">wolf@NascentInc.com</a></pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/8/2016 8:54 AM, Hodge John wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2036825879.508214.1462722856504.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff;
font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial,
Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:DoNotOptimizeForBrowser/>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2652">Wolf:</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2653">Thanks again. Yes
I think I saw the possibility in Sciama. I was unaware of his
model until you mentioned it. I don’t see how to go to an
experiment with it. </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2654"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2655">I agree with your
point about starting from basic postulates provided we
identify a basic postulate as a statement of what exists. For
example, the Equivalence Principle is not a principle because
it has an equal sign (a relation). Therefore, the derivation
of the Equivalence Principle is requirement for the basic
postulates. </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2656"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2657">The provisional
paper “<span id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2658"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho"">STOE
assumptions that model particle diffraction and that
replaces QM” is attached as a *.pdf file.</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2659"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2660"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho""> </span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2661"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2662"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho"">This
is a list of the assumptions to work that have appeared in
my papers dealing with Young’s Experiment of the years. </span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2663"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2664"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho""> </span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2665"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2666"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho"">I
would like your or any comments on unclear or new or
whatever about the model. I note these assumptions cover
many questions about topics that this forum has been asking
such as why light has the maximum speed of matter.</span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2667"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2668"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho""> </span></div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2669"><span
id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2670"
style="mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho"">Hodge</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"> </div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1462722768866_2606"><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Wolf@nascentinc.com">Wolf@nascentinc.com</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/wolf%40nascentinc.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>