<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space"
bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Hi Richard,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Thanks for that info. I'd seen
pretty well all of that before, of course - and I believe we're agreed that
there's a lot of common ground between your view of a particle and mine. I
agree also that there are some very useful contributions to the debate coming
from all of those you mention, I also found Chandra's latest posting (his book
chapter) most interesting on a rather different aspect of the same
issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>My question (below) in my previous
email was specifically about the reducing size of a particle as its speed
increases. In your previous mailing (below mine) you stated that
"<FONT size=3 face="Times New Roman">The helically-moving charged photon
composing the recoiling electron would continue to make two full helical loops
for each wavelength (as in a resting electron) but at a higher looping
frequency</FONT>", as if it's an established fact related to Compton scattering
rather than just your view (presumably essential to your model). I was
interested to know whether there is empirical evidence of this; I see that as
rather different from 'It follows from your model, which is consistent with
various empirical data' - they're two rather different things.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2
face=Arial>-------------------------</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=richgauthier@gmail.com href="mailto:richgauthier@gmail.com">Richard
Gauthier</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">Nature of Light and
Particles - General Discussion</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=phil.butler@canterbury.ac.nz
href="mailto:phil.butler@canterbury.ac.nz">Phil Butler</A> ; <A
title=abooth@ieee.org href="mailto:abooth@ieee.org">Anthony Booth</A> ; <A
title=sleary@vavi.co.uk href="mailto:sleary@vavi.co.uk">Stephen Leary</A> ; <A
title=martin.van.der.mark@philips.com
href="mailto:martin.van.der.mark@philips.com">Mark,Martin van der</A> ; <A
title=slf@unsw.edu.au href="mailto:slf@unsw.edu.au">Solomon Freer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:52
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [General] Photon cycle rate
in moving particle - faster orslower??</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Hello Grahame,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> Some of the empirical evidence that is consistent with the
relativistically-moving spin-1/2 charged photon model of the electron, that
you asked fort, is indicated below. You are right that a lateral decrease in
the size of an electron with increasing speed raises questions about
relativity, which is fine. But facts are facts, and need explaining. Maybe we
can make some progress here to further clarify these issues, as John W,
Alexander, Martin, Vivian, Chip and yourself among others, have already
contributed to.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>1) The model explains the origin of the inertial mass m of the resting
electron as due to the time rate of change of the momentum mc of the
circulating photon having circulating energy Eo=mc^2 (other circling-photon
models can also explain this), according to Newton’s 2nd law F=dp/dt = ma
.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>... etc</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>....................</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:37 AM, Dr Grahame Blackwell <<A
href="">grahame@starweave.com</A>> wrote:</DIV><BR
class=Apple-interchange-newline>
<DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Hi Richard,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>I'm not sure where you found your empirical
evidence that "<FONT size=3 face="Times New Roman">The helically-moving
charged photon composing the recoiling electron would continue to make
two full helical loops for each wavelength (as in a resting electron) but at a
higher looping frequency</FONT>", I'd be very interested to see that. Or
is it just a supposition based on SR frame symmetry?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Either way it seems to me that this proposal
creates a major problem for SR (and for the established empirical evidence):
if the formative energy of a particle is circulating faster in a moving
particle, then the effects of that energy flow (i.e. time effects within the
particle, such as particle decay - which can ONLY be down to internal energy
flow) will occur *faster* in a moving particle than in a static one; this
appears to be totally contrary to observed fact, for example in fast-moving
muons. [I appreciate that this evidence relates to muons and you're
talking about electrons - but if completely different principles apply in
those two elementary particles I think we'll need an explanation for why - and
some empirical evidence].</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); TEXT-INDENT: 0px; FONT: 12px Helvetica; WHITE-SPACE: normal; LETTER-SPACING: normal; WORD-SPACING: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Wednesday, June 22, 2016 5:43
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Re: [General] PS: Matter comprised of
light-speed energy</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Hi John D,</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> In Compton scattering, the wavelength of the incoming photon
increases, not decreases, as the photon is scattered by the electron. The
energy lost by the Compton-scattered x-ray photon is gained by the recoiling
electron. The internal wavelength of the circulating spin-1/2 charged photon
composing the recoiling electron would decrease corresponding to the increased
energy of the recoiling electron. The helically-moving charged photon
composing the recoiling electron would continue to make two full helical loops
for each wavelength (as in a resting electron) but at a higher looping
frequency, corresponding to the shorter wavelength distance along the helix
for two helical loops..</DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
Richard</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>