<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4262">Vladimer;<br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4263">You are not the only one with a bottom--up ( emergent) model. I also mention a few comments like yours about a top down (reductionist) models.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4264">STOE Emergence<br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4265">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1757</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4266">Emergent philosophy developed from the studies of biology, life, societies, and computer patterns. The Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE) model posits emergence theory models the universe. The STOE was developed from two basic agents and their interaction to the complexity of the cosmological scale. This model has described many mysteries of standard models including the structure of galaxy clusters, the microwave background temperature, rotation curves, asymmetric rotation curves, the relation of central mass parameters to outer galaxy parameters, galaxy redshift, periodic galaxy redshift, and the Pioneer Anomaly on the large scale. The STOE also suggests a photon model of light that describes Young's experiment, that rejected all wave models of light, and that described the results of the Hodge Experiment. It served as a base for explaining the Stern-Gerlach experiment. The STOE model made successful predictions of the Pioneer Anomaly and of the Hodge Experiment.</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4267">You may also note <br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4268">"Universe according to the STOE"<br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4269">http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648<br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4270">looks at gravity through several papers.<br id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4271">"We are at a special moment in our scientific evolution that requires the big of cosmology and the small of light and of particle physics be united by a single model. The Scalar Theory of Everything model (STOE) suggests fundamental assumptions with consideration for the successful parts of current models and for the data inconsistent with current models. The STOE is simpler, corresponds to both General Relativity and quantum mechanics, and solves many current mysteries and inconsistencies. Data comparisons with redshift, discrete redshift, rotation curves, asymmetric rotation curves, universe temperature, and the double slit experiment are successful. Therefore, the STOE is founded on orthodox science. Data analysis in 2011 confirmed predictions of the STOE made in 2006 that no other model suggested. A new test of the double slit experiment rejected the wave model of light and confirmed predictions of the STOE. The fundamental principles are applied to life and the purpose of life in our universe."</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4272">Hodge </div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473075952038_4273" dir="ltr"><span></span><br></div> <div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div dir="ltr"><font face="Arial" size="2"> On Monday, September 5, 2016 1:04 AM, Vladimir Tamari <vladimirtamari@hotmail.com> wrote:<br></font></div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container"><div id="yiv1615628927"><div><div>Hi John Macken</div><div>Interesting - your priority in gravitational wave detection theory through polarization.</div><div> </div><div>You wrote <span> " I took an entirely different approach than everyone else in the group. Everyone else starts with what I call the "top down" approach to physics." </span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div>Not me! I tend to agree with you that important advances can hopefully be made by creating models from first principles, as I also have <a href="http://vladimirtamari.com/beautiful_univ_rev_oct_2011.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://vladimirtamari.com/beautiful_univ_rev_oct_2011.pdf</a> . The trouble with this approach is that it assumes much of modern physics, like the concept of space-time or quantum probability or particle -wave duality even time as a dimension is 'excess baggage'. Most streamline physicists are reluctant to jettison their hard-won expertise in these fields and start on a new tack. The answer my friend is blowin' in the [ether] wind!</div><div>Cheers</div><div>Vladimir <br><br><div>_____________________<div><a href="http://vladimirtamari.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">vladimirtamari.com</a></div></div></div><div><br>On Sep 1, 2016, at 3:40 AM, John Macken <<a href="mailto:jmacken@stmarys-ca.edu" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:jmacken@stmarys-ca.edu">jmacken@stmarys-ca.edu</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"> In fact, I would say that this article
fills the critical gap in the theory. I took an entirely different
approach than everyone else in the group. Everyone else starts with what
I call the "top down" approach to physics.</blockquote></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:vladimirtamari@hotmail.com" ymailto="mailto:vladimirtamari@hotmail.com">vladimirtamari@hotmail.com</a><br><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/vladimirtamari%40hotmail.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" ymailto="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com">jchodge@frontier.com</a><br><a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>Click here to unsubscribe<br></a><br><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>