<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Some (me too) find it easier to see the deflection of light through douoble slits as a lot less mystical as a wave phenomena. But then, why are the waves registered as a distribution of point flashes? [Ans: becasue waves are detected when impinging on a detector made of a matrix of photoelectron sources, which at very low intensity "flash" separatly.] Why are particle beams (electrons) deflected like waves at slits (& double, triple, etc.)? Ans: beacuse they are surfing on deBroglie modes of the E&M background---The background modes do the diffraction, the particles trajectories expose it.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Don't overlook: all "photon" phenomena without exception are ultimately observed using photo-detectors (i.e., as "photo currents" of electrons. The photon story is deduced from multiple observations of photo currents statictially. NO individual photon has ever been observed; just photoelectrons, in slits, Compton, wherever!)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Vienna (Zeilinger & group) are all fanatic beleivers in the mystical concept of "reality as information". Were they to study and comprehend the criticcisms I & others have raised against "entanglement," Bell, etc. they would collapse of embarrasment for all the "egg on their facres"! BTW, I have personally put my pubs into the hands of Zeilinger! Silence! Along with 60+ other experts on quantum optics who have promissed me a devistating rebuttal "when they find time." Very busy bunch!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Neutrons at least have mass!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For any and all of my papers see: www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com </div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, Al</div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag, 08. September 2016 um 16:42 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht Giese" <genmail@a-giese.de><br/>
<b>An:</b> "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'" <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] photons: particles or?</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255,255,255);">
<p><font size="-1">Al,<br/>
true that there are particles which are accessible more easily. But photons can be deflected by double slits, also by the Compton effect. And they can also interact with other photons under specific conditions. There is just a new report published by the university of Vienna/Wien (Austria). Published in "Nature Photonics". And on the other hand: If one wants to manipulate a neutron and get it into a specific direction, is that simple? </font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Is there in easy access to your paper of 1978?</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Albrecht</font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>