<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font size="-1">Al:</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">please see below.</font><br>
</p>
<font size="-1">Am 09.09.2016 um 03:27 schrieb <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:af.kracklauer@web.de">af.kracklauer@web.de</a>:</font><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div>Albrecht:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Some (me too) find it easier to see the deflection of
light through douoble slits as a lot less mystical as a wave
phenomena. But then, why are the waves registered as a
distribution of point flashes? [Ans: becasue waves are
detected when impinging on a detector made of a matrix of
photoelectron sources, which at very low intensity "flash"
separatly.] Why are particle beams (electrons) deflected
like waves at slits (& double, triple, etc.)? Ans:
beacuse they are surfing on deBroglie modes of the E&M
background---The background modes do the diffraction, the
particles trajectories expose it.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1">Yes, basically I agree, and that shows that the
reactions of photons on the one hand and electrons and neutrons
etc. on the other hand are similar. - De Broglie has explained
this behaviour of particles by the "pilot wave". This wave has,
however, to my knowledge nothing to do with E&M.</font><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>Don't overlook: all "photon" phenomena without exception
are ultimately observed using photo-detectors (i.e., as
"photo currents" of electrons. The photon story is deduced
from multiple observations of photo currents statictially.
NO individual photon has ever been observed; just
photoelectrons, in slits, Compton, wherever!)</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1">No, I have explained my experiment. In that case
single photons were detected individually by pair production. The
pair presented the correct energy of each photon. So not in a
statistical way but by a clearly individual reaction. </font><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>Vienna (Zeilinger & group) are all fanatic beleivers
in the mystical concept of "reality as information". Were
they to study and comprehend the criticcisms I & others
have raised against "entanglement," Bell, etc. they would
collapse of embarrasment for all the "egg on their facres"!
BTW, I have personally put my pubs into the hands of
Zeilinger! Silence! Along with 60+ other experts on
quantum optics who have promissed me a devistating rebuttal
"when they find time." Very busy bunch!</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1">I did not refer to Zeilinger but to Arno
Rauschenbeutel, the experiment was published in "Nature Photonics"
a few days ago. Also there are several papers of theorists who
stated that photons can interact with photons even though it is
difficult to demonstrate.</font><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>Neutrons at least have mass!</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1">Also photons have mass if in motion. They have never
been observed at rest, so never without mass. The massless photon
is a theoretical result. </font><br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>For any and all of my papers see:
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com">www.nonloco-physics.0catch.com</a> <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<font size="-1">I have looked at it but it seems to cover a
different topic.<br>
<br>
Ciao, Albrecht<br>
</font>
<blockquote
cite="mid:trinity-9ea58df8-abe0-441a-839d-a5e1b605fb4e-1473384475568@3capp-webde-bap11"
type="cite">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>ciao, Al</div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding:
10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5;
word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag,
08. September 2016 um 16:42 Uhr<br>
<b>Von:</b> "Albrecht Giese" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de"><genmail@a-giese.de></a><br>
<b>An:</b> "'Nature of Light and Particles - General
Discussion'"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] photons: particles or?</div>
<div name="quoted-content">
<div style="background-color: rgb(255,255,255);">
<p><font size="-1">Al,<br>
true that there are particles which are accessible
more easily. But photons can be deflected by
double slits, also by the Compton effect. And they
can also interact with other photons under
specific conditions. There is just a new report
published by the university of Vienna/Wien
(Austria). Published in "Nature Photonics". And on
the other hand: If one wants to manipulate a
neutron and get it into a specific direction, is
that simple? </font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Is there in easy access to your
paper of 1978?</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Albrecht</font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
<tr>
<td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
<a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">
<img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
</a>
</td>
<td>
<p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
<br><a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus">www.avast.com</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>