<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff text=#000000>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Hi Albrecht (et al),</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>I am in full agreement with your
analysis of the orbital rate of the formative energy of an electron in
motion. In short, I agree with your derivation of the Lorentz factor as
applied in SR; I also agree that this factor is unchanged if the electron moves
in any arbitary direction; I can further confirm that it is likewise unchanged
(cycle period of moving particle: cycle period of static particle) no matter
WHAT the nature or complexity of the cyclical flow-pattern that
generates the particle in question.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>The resulting extended time-interval
per cycle of course indicates the rate of 'time-flow', since time-effects must
necessarily be propagated by the flow around, as well as between, particles;
this gives a clear reason for time dilation as widely confirmed by
experiment. This (a) removes the need for some metaphysical property of
the universe in order to explain time dilation; and (b) confirms the invariant
radius of the cyclic flow forming a particle (since the Lorentz factor is given
by helical flow ONLY if that helical flow is unchanged with respect to radius) -
a clear example of empirical evidence supporting that invariance.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>I also find you observations on the
conventional view of electron radius, in contrast to your own work and that of
Schr<FONT color=#000000 face="Times New Roman">ö</FONT>dinger, most
interesting.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Thank you,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial>Grahame</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000080 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=genmail@a-giese.de href="mailto:genmail@a-giese.de">Albrecht
Giese</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org
href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">general@lists..natureoflightandparticles.org</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 09, 2017 9:27
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [General] On particle
radius</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<P>Sorry, a little error below:</P>
<P>The period of the motion in the electron will not be reduced but will be
<U>extended </U>following <FONT size=-1>T' = T *
sqrt(1/(1--v<SUP>2</SUP>/c<SUP>2</SUP>))</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>Albrecht<BR></FONT></P><BR>
<DIV class=moz-cite-prefix>Am 09.01.2017 um 21:31 schrieb Albrecht
Giese:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:8d19121c-08dc-bebc-e2b3-522c1a61230e@a-giese.de
type="cite">
<P><FONT size=-1>Hi Chip, hi All,<BR></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>the problem of the limitation of the internal speed in the
electron is not complicated. It is the cause if relativistic
dilation.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>If an electron is a particle which is built by something
which permanently orbits at c, then in case of the motion of the electron,
this internal speed will continue to be c with respect to the external
frame. If now the electron moves into an axial direction with respect to the
orbit at speed v then the circular motion will turn into a helical
motion. If the motion on the helix is still c then the period T of this
motion will be reduced to some T' as given by Pythagoras: T' = T *
sqrt(1/(1--v<SUP>2</SUP>/c<SUP>2</SUP>)), which by the way is the Lorentz
factor of SRT.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>If the electron moves into an arbitrary direction with
respect to the orbit, then the calculation of more complicated but has the
same result. I can give it if there is a demand.<BR></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>To the radius of the electron itself (and I must apologize
that I did not fully follow the preceding discussion:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>If the elementary charge e<SUB>0</SUB> in the electron
orbits at c then the magnetic moment of the electron is classically µ =
i*pi*R<SUP>2</SUP> where we insert for the current i = e<SUB>0</SUB> *
c/(2pi*R) . Then we get µ = c * e<SUB>0</SUB>* R/2 . Now we can use the
known value of the magnetic moment µ to determine the radius R. The result
of this is R = 3.86 * 10<SUP>-13</SUP> m. <BR></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>This result is in conflict with main stream as the official
physics says that the electron is point-like (R<10<SUP>-18 </SUP>m). But
it is in agreement with Erwin Schrödinger. In his famous paper in which
Schrödinger evaluated the Dirac function, his result for the "size of the
electron" was "roughly about" R = 4 * 10<SUP>-13</SUP> m. Schrödinger came
to this result by pure QM considerations. And then he makes a funny
statement. He says in his paper: "We know that the electron is point-like.
So, there must be an error in my calculation. But I cannot find this error".
- I think that not Schrödinger was in error but main stream is in error. And
this early result of Schrödinger confirms the classical calculation which I
have shown above.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>Does this help the discussion?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=-1>Albrecht</FONT><BR><BR></P><!--[if !mso]><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:-16.55pt;margin-top:-111pt;width:131.45pt;height:124.5pt;z-index:251659264;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:margin;mso-height-relative:margin'>
<v:imagedata src="mailbox:///C:/Users/AL/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/lthhzma2.default/Mail/pop3.strato-7.de/Inbox?number=270185650&header=quotebody&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.png" o:title="" />
<w:wrap type="tight"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>