<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p>Sorry, a little error below:</p>
    <p>The period of the motion in the electron will not be reduced but
      will be <u>extended </u>following <font size="-1">T' = T *
        sqrt(1/(1--v<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>2</sup>))</font></p>
    <p><font size="-1">Albrecht<br>
      </font></p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 09.01.2017 um 21:31 schrieb Albrecht
      Giese:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:8d19121c-08dc-bebc-e2b3-522c1a61230e@a-giese.de"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <p><font size="-1">Hi Chip, hi All,<br>
        </font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">the problem of the limitation of the internal
          speed in the electron is not complicated. It is the cause if
          relativistic dilation.</font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">If an electron is a particle which is built by
          something which permanently orbits at c, then in case of the
          motion of the electron, this internal speed will continue to
          be c with respect to the external frame. If now the electron
          moves into an axial direction with respect to the orbit at 
          speed v then the circular motion will turn into a helical
          motion. If the motion on the helix is still c then the period
          T of this motion will be reduced to some T' as given by
          Pythagoras: T' = T * sqrt(1/(1--v<sup>2</sup>/c<sup>2</sup>)),
          which by the way is the Lorentz factor of SRT.</font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">If the electron moves into an arbitrary
          direction with respect to the orbit, then the calculation of
          more complicated but has the same result. I can give it if
          there is a demand.<br>
        </font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">To the radius of the electron itself (and I
          must apologize that I did not fully follow the preceding
          discussion:</font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">If the elementary charge e<sub>0</sub> in the
          electron orbits at c then the magnetic moment of the electron
          is classically µ = i*pi*R<sup>2</sup>  where we insert for the
          current i = e<sub>0</sub> * c/(2pi*R) . Then we get µ = c * e<sub>0</sub>*
          R/2 . Now we can use the known value of the magnetic moment µ
          to determine the radius R. The result of this is R = 3.86 * 10<sup>-13</sup>
          m. <br>
        </font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">This result is in conflict with main stream as
          the official physics says that the electron is point-like
          (R<10<sup>-18 </sup>m). But it is in agreement with Erwin
          Schrödinger. In his famous paper in which Schrödinger
          evaluated the Dirac function, his result for the "size of the
          electron" was "roughly about" R = 4 * 10<sup>-13</sup> m.
          Schrödinger came to this result by pure QM considerations. And
          then he makes a funny statement. He says in his paper: "We
          know that the electron is point-like. So, there must be an
          error in my calculation. But I cannot find this error". - I
          think that not Schrödinger was in error but main stream is in
          error. And this early result of Schrödinger confirms the
          classical calculation which I have shown above.</font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">Does this help the discussion?</font></p>
      <p><font size="-1">Albrecht</font><br>
        <br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 09.01.2017 um 19:10 schrieb Chip
        Akins:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:028501d26aa3$99794200$cc6bc600$@gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=windows-1252">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
          medium)">
        <base href="x-msg://859/"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
        <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1027" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Hi All<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">For those of
              yoµu who hold the hard line that nothing can move faster
              than c (a common interpretation of SR) the following is a
              bit of speculation.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">If the energy
              within the electron is all circulating at c, and the
              electron is an extended particle, then the field lines
              might look something like the following illustration…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">
<v:stroke joinstyle="miter" />
<v:formulas>
<v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0" />
<v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1" />
<v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth" />
<v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0" />
<v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight" />
<v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0" />
</v:formulas>
<v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect" />
<o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t" />
</v:shapetype><v:shape id="Picture_x0020_1" o:spid="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" style='position:absolute;margin-left:-16.55pt;margin-top:-111pt;width:131.45pt;height:124.5pt;z-index:251659264;visibility:visible;mso-wrap-style:square;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-wrap-distance-left:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-top:0;mso-wrap-distance-right:9pt;mso-wrap-distance-bottom:0;mso-position-horizontal:absolute;mso-position-horizontal-relative:text;mso-position-vertical:absolute;mso-position-vertical-relative:text;mso-width-percent:0;mso-height-percent:0;mso-width-relative:margin;mso-height-relative:margin'>
<v:imagedata src="mailbox:///C:/Users/AL/AppData/Roaming/Thunderbird/Profiles/lthhzma2.default/Mail/pop3.strato-7.de/Inbox?number=270185650&header=quotebody&part=1.1.2&filename=image001.png" o:title="" />
<w:wrap type="tight"/>
</v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><img
              src="cid:part1.AE27A6CC.2B065A63@a-giese.de"
              v:shapes="Picture_x0020_1" height="166" hspace="12"
              align="left" width="175"><!--[endif]--><span
              style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">At any rate,
              the field lines would spiral outward from the center,
              moving at c at all points.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">This structure
              would not exhibit a specific frequency, or a finite set of
              frequencies, but would contain any frequency one might
              choose. So unless we can conceive of some mechanism which
              would only make certain frequencies visible, or some
              boundary conditions which would constrain the energy to a
              specific radius. Then this approach is not useful in
              discovering the electron’s mysteries.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In fact, if a
              “photon”, or an EM wave if you prefer, can have a spin of
              hbar, and has a momentum of <i>p=E/c</i>, then the radius
              of action of this wave is <i>r = hbar/momentum</i>. Such
              a wave then must have a transverse displacement velocity
              of at least 3.489 times <i>c</i> in order for the wave to
              exist in this form. Also, the internal wavefront must be
              moving at the <i>sqrt(2) c. </i>So I think it must be
              that some things simply move faster than <i>c </i>as
              John Stewart Bell suggested. A more Lorentzian form of
              relativity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          <div>
            <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
              1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
                  General
                  [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">mailto:general-bounces+chipakins=gmail.com@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org</a>]
                  <b>On Behalf Of </b>Dr Grahame Blackwell<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, January 08, 2017 4:10 PM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General
                  Discussion <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"><general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org></a><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] On particle radius<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Hi
                Chip,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Many
                thanks indeed for your succinct and well-presented case
                ('succinct' is clearly a useful word in this discussion
                - as well as a good strategy!).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I
                need to go through this carefully and thoroughly and see
                how it relates to my own understanding of the
                situation.  As we're all agreed, we all have things to
                learn from each other and (here I DO agree with Vivian's
                metaphor) each have some aspect of the elephant (in the
                room?) to contribute.  I'm really looking forward to
                considering what you've said below and hopefully
                assimilating it into a fuller understanding on my own
                part of the issues that need to be taken into
                consideration.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">I'll
                come back to you when I've processed it thoroughly (may
                take a few days) and have some thoughts to offer.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Thanks
                again,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:navy">Grahame</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid navy
            1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">-----
                  Original Message ----- <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="background:#E4E4E4"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:chipakins@gmail.com"
                    title="chipakins@gmail.com">Chip Akins</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">To:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> <a
                    moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org"
                    title="general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org">'Nature
                    of Light and Particles - General Discussion'</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Sent:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">
                  Sunday, January 08, 2017 9:22 PM<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
                    style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Subject:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> Re:
                  [General] On particle radius<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
            </div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black" lang="EN-GB">Hi
                Dr Graham Blackwell<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">I like the
                way you clearly and succinctly write.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Let me
                explain some of the reasons why I feel the radius of the
                electron decreases with velocity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In order to
                accelerate the electron at rest, we must apply energy
                (force through distance).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">The only way
                to apply energy to the electron, when we get down to the
                basis, is to add energy to its existing confined wave
                structure.  Planck’s rule suggests that this confined
                wave structure with energy added has a wavelength which
                is (h c)/E. If this is the case and the momentum of this
                wave remains p=E/c, then in order to be a spin ½ hbar
                particle, it seems the electron must have a radius which
                is r = (h c)/(4 pi E). Where E is the new total energy
                with velocity throughout this paragraph.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Then when we
                calculate the mass of this particle from its confined
                momentum (as Richard has pointed out) we get the
                expected relativistic (total) mass of the moving
                particle. m = E/(r w c) = E/c^2= E Eo Uo. Which is
                exactly equivalent to m = y m. [where w = c/r (angular
                frequency)].<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">This is the
                only scenario I have found where all of the expected
                parameters are accommodated, and I have searched
                extensively for other possibilities.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">We also note
                that the scattering cross-section of an electron at
                relativistic velocities is very small, and agrees with
                these assumptions quite well.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">In order for
                the electron radius to remain the same size with
                velocity I think we have to ignore things which seem
                quite important, and these specific things appear to be
                required in order to tie several of the pieces of the
                puzzle together. It seems the picture is just not
                complete unless the radius of the electron is reduced
                with velocity.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Thoughts?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Chip<o:p></o:p></span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
        <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <hr style="border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0;
        height: 1px; width: 99%;">
      <table style="border-collapse:collapse;border:none;">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td style="border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px"> <a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">
                <img moz-do-not-send="true"
                  src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png"
                  alt="Avast logo" border="0"> </a> </td>
            <td>
              <p style="color:#3d4d5a;
font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica";
                font-size:12pt;"> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast
                Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. <br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">www.avast.com</a>
              </p>
            </td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phys@a-giese.de">phys@a-giese.de</a>
<a href=<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1">"http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/phys%40a-giese.de?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1"</a>>
Click here to unsubscribe
</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
        <tr>
                <td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
                        <a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">
                                <img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" alt="Avast logo" />
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
                                Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
                                <br><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient">www.avast.com</a>
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>