<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Dear Colleagues:
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">This is in response to the query by Dr. Wolfgang Baer, “</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Is there evidence of photons bending in EM fields?</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">”.
My answer is “no”, because it is phenomenologically impossible in the <b><i>linear domain</i></b> and in the absence of a material medium.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> My life-long experience tells me that it is highly beneficial to have a thorough understanding of the
<b><i>basic optical phenomena and the related basic experiments</i></b> and theories. Optical (EM waves from radio up to “Gamma Rays”) experiments have been providing the most accurate validating data for most physics phenomena since ancient times.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> After I published the attached “polite” paper, “Heisenberg's Microscope-A Misleading Illustration”, in 1978; I was referred to some history behind Heisenberg’s thesis defense. He could have
been flunked by Wien, except for the thesis adviser’s appeal to Wien. Wien asked Heisenberg to explain the physical processes behind the emergence of the concept of limits of resolving power in instruments like (i) a microscope, (ii) a telescope and (iii)
a spectroscope. Heisenberg was totally blank. Nonetheless, soon after, he produced a paper on Uncertainty Principle, misdirecting the interpretation of an excellent mathematical formalism of his own (QM) in the wrong direction. Nobel committee has recently
given prize for super resolution in imaging molecules with light; which are many orders of magnitude smaller than the visible light. There is only instrumental limits, not fundamental limits in obtaining higher and higher resolution data out of experiments.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> Similarly, we are collectively oblivious to the REALITY of Non-Interaction of Waves (NIW). EM waves in the linear domain and in the absence of material dipoles (or, their assembly) cannot
interact to re-organize the energy contained in the propagating wave packets passing through each other. This realization has forced me to re-interpret the “abandoned ether concept ” as the stationary cosmic “Complex Tension Field” (CTF). Huygens-Fresnel diffraction
integral, the very foundational mathematical frame-work behind optical science and engineering since 1817, would not have been working and thriving without this Non-Interaction of Waves (NIW-property of all waves). Huygens postulated NIW around 1676. By benignly
neglecting (and/or ignoring) this basic working postulate of Huygens, the 19<sup>th</sup> and the 20<sup>th</sup> century “New Physics” developers, facilitated the emergence of Non-Causal Physics.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> So, I have written a whole book, “Causal Physics: Photon Model by Non-Interaction of Waves”, CRC, 2014, where I show, for all the major optical phenomena on how the NIW-property explains
them better and removes many ad hoc non-causal postulates by Classical Quantum Mechanics, including “single indivisible photon”. [The book is already available as low-cost paper-back in India. Initiative has started for a similar edition in China.]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"> I am attaching my latest experiment, presented at the Photonics 2016 international conference. It demonstrates, a visually observable purely classical superposition effect through a Mach-Zehnder
interferometer, that one needs two optical signals to be simultaneously present at the interferometer beam-combiner to generate any superposition effects (re-direction of wave energy). A “single indivisible photon”, even it ever existed, cannot generate observable
superposition effect.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D">Chandra.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> General [mailto:general-bounces+chandra.roychoudhuri=uconn.edu@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Hodge John<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, January 22, 2017 8:58 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [General] Charged photon?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div id="yiv9905726911">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1485136533819_5869">
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1485136533819_5868">
<div id="yiv9905726911yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1485136533819_2743">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Not that I'm aware.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1485136533819_5867">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Oops.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1485136533819_5867">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">Hodge<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">On Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:25 PM, Wolfgang Baer <<a href="mailto:wolf@nascentinc.com">wolf@nascentinc.com</a>> wrote:</span><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black">John<br>
<br>
Is there evidence of photons bending in EM fields? I know there is some <br>
who have promoted EM field to field interactions, but how solid are these?<br>
<br>
Dr. Wolfgang Baer<br>
Research Director<br>
Nascent Systems Inc.<br>
tel/fax 831-659-3120/0432<br>
E-mail <a href="mailto:wolf@NascentInc.com" target="_blank">wolf@NascentInc.com</a><br>
<br>
On 1/22/2017 11:49 AM, Hodge John wrote:<br>
> The photon becomes polarized when passing through a magnetic field. <br>
> Its path curves when passing through an electric field.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
If you no longer wish to receive communication from the Nature of Light and Particles General Discussion List at
<a href="mailto:jchodge@frontier.com" target="_blank">jchodge@frontier.com</a><br>
<a href="<a href="http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1" target="_blank">http://lists.natureoflightandparticles.org/options.cgi/general-natureoflightandparticles.org/jchodge%40frontier.com?unsub=1&unsubconfirm=1</a>"><br>
Click here to unsubscribe<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div id="yiv9905726911yqtfd27388">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><br>
</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;background:white"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>