<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hi Hodge et al.:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The implicit assumptions behind some of your statements here seem to be based on currenty dogma. To get at least the points I have been trying to make, start over from the fact that all ostensible observations of E&M "fields" are actually observations of impunged fields on photo electrons, which can be counted (mostly after an avalanche ...). The parcelization of the electron is the source of the impression that the cause of its motion is parcelized. This is a leap of logic. In fact, per orthodox theory, every electron is always bathed in the interaction (field if you like) of all ether charges in the universe at all times (- to + inf.) because there is no off-on switch to Gauss's Law (1/r²). The total effect of the universe of background charges (Olber-like) causes QM effects while the near charges have indiviually observable effects described by (mostly) classical E&M theory.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>BTW, the word conglomeate "the diffraction of one photon" makes no sense, even in orthodox Q&M, as all that can be observed is actually just one photo-electron. To see the diffraction pattern requires an ensemble of many such observations so as to see the distribution of single photo-electon responces. Attribution of ensemble distribution characteristics to single entities is again an unsupported leap of logic.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best, Al</div>
<div>
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Samstag, 04. Februar 2017 um 00:33 Uhr<br/>
<b>Von:</b> "Hodge John" <jchodge@frontier.com><br/>
<b>An:</b> "Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion" <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org><br/>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [General] Photon Structure</div>
<div name="quoted-content">Hi Al, Chip, Albrecht, Andrew, and John D.<br/>
<br/>
the diffraction experiment with low intensity (one photon in the experiment at a time) produces a diffraction pattern. The pattern characteristics such as the spacing of the minima depends on the photon's energy. that is it depends on the photon. in the experiment say between the mask and screen. So it cannot be from all other photons in the universe.<br/>
Problem, how does the wave / alternations effect the photon. I suggest reflection from matter (mask and screen).<br/>
Electric charges are reflected from surfaces (see books o antenna theory). So, it is plausable that such a model could satisfy my photon diffraction experiment. Slight changes in my equations would probably yield the same solution. I chose the gravity wave model to unite it with GR, to allow spin=1, and to yield the polarization of photons in magnetic fields.<br/>
Hodge<br/>
--------------------------------------------<br/>
On Fri, 2/3/17, John Macken <john@macken.com> wrote:<br/>
<br/>
Subject: Re: [General] Photon Structure<br/>
To: "'Nature of Light and Particles - General Discussion'" <general@lists.natureoflightandparticles.org>, phys@a-giese.de<br/>
Date: Friday, February 3, 2017, 3:30 PM<br/>
<br/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>